Things 2 Read

Buzz Dixon also sends along this link to Monster Kid Magazine, an online "publication" in the spirit of the old Famous Monsters of Filmland.  It's put together by Kerry Gammill, whose artwork is sadly missed these days around the comic book business.  You might especially enjoy Bill Warren's article about visiting the set of one of Boris Karloff's last films and meeting the man himself.

An old pal of mine, Jay Zilber, is running a good political/news commentary web page and I've placed it on my "check out almost every day" list.  If you'd like to sample it so you can consider adding it to yours, click right here.

Let's all thank Ed Golick for calling my attention to a great article on Soupy Sales so I could call it to your attention.  It's in the Detroit News and you can read it by clicking here.

A few years ago, Playboy Magazine ran a pretty good interview with Albert Brooks.  An Albert Brooks fan site has posted it; in fact, they have a version of it that includes some stuff that Playboy trimmed for space.  Here's that link.

Recommended Reading

My pal Buzz Dixon recommends this link to an article about things like bio-terrorism, chemical warfare and other so-called weapons of mass destruction. It's by a retired military weapons expert who says that such tactics are not as easy nor as lethal as some think. In other words, it's a fear-calmer, and it's about time someone wrote one.

In a week, it'll be two months since we all stared open-mouthed at the scenes of destruction on "The Day of Infamy." Is it just me or do phrases like, "Everything has changed," uttered as gospel at the time, now seem a bit overwrought and hysterical? Things have changed in the sense that things always change, and we have a lot of issues before us that weren't there in the good ol' days of Gary Condit and Monica. But I think we're a lot closer to normal now than we thought we'd be…and probably also farther from some sort of satisfying victory over the Forces of Evil.

I mean, a few days after 9/11, when it became clear that this Bin Laden guy was the baddie, did you think we'd be sitting here, almost two months later, hearing the Secretary of Defense saying, in effect, "Well, maybe we won't catch him"? I sure didn't.

Things seem amazingly normal to me. We've had the World Series, we've had the Emmy Awards, the Republicans are finding ways to shovel more of the treasury at wealthy Americans (especially those in the oil/energy business who gave money to the G.O.P.) and the Democrats are doing little more than saying, "Shame, shame."

Glx Sptzl Glaah!

One of the all-time great comic books — and a rare example of individual style and statement over a long run — was Sheldon Mayer's Sugar and Spike.

Mr. Mayer was one of the pioneers of the industry as an editor.  He was one of the first to see the potential of a little thing called Superman and he later presided over some of the best super-hero titles, like Flash and Green Lantern.  But he came to hate editing and wanted to get back to his first love, which was cartooning, and DC Comics finally allowed him to do so.  He did wonderful work with Scribbly, The Three Mouseketeers, Doodles Duck and a few others…but Sugar and Spike was his magnum opus.  He wrote and drew the tale of two baby-talking children for 15 years.

For years, a small but fervent band of fans have lobbied DC Comics to reprint the strip, preferably in some kind of fancy "keeper" volume.  They're not going to do that but, next May, they're coming out with a facsimile reprint of Sugar and Spike #1.  And the same month, their toy/novelty division (DC Direct) will be releasing soft toys of Mayer's irresistible moppets.  The pic above is not of the final versions, but it's close, and I'll sure be buying the set.  You might want to alert your comic shop owner that you want one, too.

me on the web

Over at Animation World Magazine, various folks (including Yours Truly) are polled on their recollections of this year's Comic-Con International. And Sergio and I made the online comic strip, Superosity.

Recommended Reading

Just to remind you all: Articles that are recommended on this site are not necessarily articles with which I agree.  I just think they say something important and/or say it well.  (Just find me another site which will link to Vidal and Buckley at the same time.)

Black Cat = Good Luck

Once upon a time, a gent named Alfred Harvey founded the comic book company that bore his name.  Although the firm was later known best for comics like Casper the Friendly Ghost and Richie Rich, they published many books of many kinds.  In 1941, in a book called Pocket Comics, Mr. Harvey launched a very fine adventure strip called The Black Cat.  That's the second issue up there on the left.  The character soon graduated to her own comic, which was published intermittently and in many forms for decades.  Many stories featured superb, Caniff-inspired artwork by Lee Elias.

Although the Harvey company and its best-known properties were later sold to others, a few characters remained in the family.  A few years back, Alan Harvey began publishing, reprinting classic old Black Cat stories and even commissioning a new one by Yours Truly and one of comics' great artists, Murphy Anderson.  If you go to his website, www.blackcatcomics.com, you can read that story on-line and order, for very reasonable prices, some of those comics.  We suggest you do this.

Today's Topics

Media alert:  My friend Bob Elisberg informs me that, this Saturday at 5 PM, Turner Classic Movies is presenting a special 40th anniversary broadcast of West Side Story.  Says Bob, "They're promoting it as having new interviews with many of the surviving participants that they'll run before and after the movie."

Who says Broadway is suffering?  The producers of The Producers are going to mark up the price of certain of their best seats, all the way from $100 to $480.  This is, they say, a way to combat scalpers.  Details are here but since it's a New York Times link, you have to register (it's free) and it may expire soon.

A follow-up on our item about the World Trade Center being quietly removed from Conan O'Brien's set: The facade of the New York, New York casino depicts scaled-down versions of the Statue of Liberty, the Empire State Building, the Chrysler Building and other major Manhattan landmarks.  So do they now have to remove the W.T.C.?  No.  The World Trade Center was never part of the tableau, apparently because the planners felt that the Twin Towers would present certain design problems.  So they just omitted them…and now, the depiction of N.Y. is sadly accurate.

Lastly: This is to inform all that, effective as of last week, I am no longer one of the owners of the restaurant known as Hamptons Hollywood Cafe in the great state of Hollywood.  Nor will I probably be dining there in the future, either.  (It's a long story…)

Recommended Reading

Mad World Meanderings

Ignore what I said a few weeks ago here about the new DVD release of It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World.  This is not the "restored" version (which is not really restored) that was released on Laserdisc a few years ago, though it contains some of the same special features, including trailers and the "Making Of…" documentary.  The version of the film on the DVD is…well, let's run through this again and I hope I get it right…

The film, as released in November of 1963 in selected cities was 192 minutes long.  This includes the overture and entr'acte music.

Around a half-hour was then cut for the nationwide general release.  This version was either 161, 162 or 163 minutes, depending on who was running the stopwatch.  Again, the overture and entr'acte music are included in that total.  (Like the version above, this one was on 70mm film.)

The first 35mm version was then mastered for general theatrical release.  This one was without the orchestra and entr'acte music and lost one or two short scenes, as well.  It clocked in at 154-156 minutes and was the version initially released on home video and used for most TV prints.  Producer-director Stanley Kramer was sometimes quoted as preferring this version, explaining that the studio had pushed for a box office spectacle.

A few years ago, a fake "restored" version was released on Laserdisc and VHS, and run occasionally on Turner-owned TV networks.  This one incorporated deleted footage (i.e., footage that was never in any theatrical release) and came in at 186 minutes.  Some of the added material consisted of alternate takes for scenes that were cut after Version #1.  Other scenes were ones that Kramer himself cut before the film's debut.  Whatever, it was generally misunderstood to be a version in which someone had re-inserted all the material that had ever been excised.  Not so.  Almost none of the new footage was ever in the above two versions and many, many scenes were absent in any form, including a choice one involving a split-screen phone call between Spencer Tracy and Buster Keaton.

The new DVD features, on one side, a good print of the 154-156 minute version.  Flip the disc over and, among the special features you'll find is a whole mess — an hour or so — of deleted scenes.  They are not in sequence and some of the picture quality varies.  I haven't waded through them all yet but it would seem to be everything they could find, as of the DVD's mastering.  (A rumor I cannot corroborate says that even more lost footage has since become un-lost.)

Video and audio quality are quite good, so I would say that this DVD does the film justice and is the best-possible product that could be issued at this time.

I still love this movie but I do not disagree strenuously with the criticisms that my pal Andy Ihnatko voices in his review of the DVD.  It hasn't been posted yet but it should turn up any day on Aaron Barnhart's splendid site, TV Barn, which you oughta be visiting anyway.

Face Time

A rare West coast exhibit of the works of Al Hirschfeld opened last evening at the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences in Beverly Hills.  It's free, it's there through 1/20/02 and you can get the hours (and a sneak peek at a few choice items) by clicking on this link.  If you're in New York and want to glimpse Hirschfeld originals, you can o.d. at the Margo Feiden Gallery, which is on Madison Avenue between 62nd and 63rd Streets…plus, Mr. Hirschfeld has been so prolific that there are a number of theaters and libraries around Manhattan with semi-permanent exhibits.  Indeed, it is not at all difficult if you're on that island to get a glimpse of originals by the one and only Al Hirschfeld.  But an exhibit in Los Angeles is a rare treat and for Mr. Hirschfeld, age 97, to take the train out to appear at last night's opening is even rarer.

A packed house — the theater seats 1,012 — enjoyed film clips and listened intently as Robert Osborne conducted a warm, informative interview with the world's greatest celebrity-renderer.  (It's a little difficult to hang a more specific job description than "artist" on what Hirschfeld does.  He doesn't cotton to the term "caricaturist," while "cartoonist" seems woefully inadequate.)

One drawing that is not included in the new exhibit is the above rendering of the operator of this website, the original to which is huge and on my wall.  In 1992, a TV producer for whom I'd worked arranged as a "thank-you" present for me to meet and sit for a caricature by the esteemed Mr. Hirschfeld.  The drawing, complete with three NINAs secreted in my hair, turned out to be the second-best part of the gift.  To spend an afternoon with the man was even better.

I arrived at his home precisely at 1 PM, as instructed, with photos I could leave for his later reference.  It turned out there had been a miscommunication — he thought it was 2:00 and was out — but that was okay.  I spent a lovely hour chatting with Dolly, his wife of more than 50 years, and a former actress whose career dated back to D.W. Griffith.  (Dolly has since passed away and Al has remarried.)

When Mr. Hirschfeld arrived, apologizing profusely and needlessly, he led me up four floors of stairs (it felt like nine) to the studio where he draws in his trusty barber's chair.  There I sat, self-consciously, as he did a few sketches of my puss.  Having spent much of his life drawing in dark theaters, he never once glanced at the pad of paper, but I did.  The roughs, in dark pencil, were dead-on as caricatures but decidedly more angular and exaggerated than his familiar style.  I asked and he explained that they were only for him — he almost never allows his roughs to be seen — and that, when he does the finished work, he "pretties up" his subjects.  "People would kill me," he explained, "if I drew them in print the way I draw them in my quick studies."

We spoke very little of cartooning and indeed, his studio was largely devoid of the kind of books, paraphernalia and even art supplies I have seen in every other cartoonist's work space I've visited.  One section was taken up with antique shadow puppets; another, with theatre books and memorabilia.  Apart from the barber chair and drawing table, the only clues as to the occupation of the resident were a small shelf of pens, pencils and bottles of ink, and a large pile of the oversized illustration boards on which he likes to work.  Having been informed I was versed in comic and cartooning lore, he offered that he was utterly naïve about the field.  He knew of Charles Schulz, Jim Davis, Garry Trudeau, a handful of political cartoonists…and absolutely no one else then drawing funny pictures for a living.  This was said, I thought, with a sense of distance.  People often asked him about others who output line drawings, particularly of celebrities, but he simply didn't feel he had anything in common with them.

Most of the afternoon, we spent discussing theatre and the then-recent "Rodney King" rioting in Los Angeles.  The former was what I wanted to talk about and he indulged me with some first-hand anecdotes about George S. Kaufman and Frank Loesser.  The latter was what interested him.  He said he'd read all the newspaper coverage but didn't trust what they said and wanted the impressions of someone who actually lived in Los Angeles — an interesting request from a man who had then been on the payroll of The New York Times for close to seventy years.

I allowed myself a few geeky, fan-type questions, one of which was, "Is there any one actor who was especially fun or challenging to draw?"  His answer on both counts — and I'm sure it was an answer he'd given before to an oft-asked query — was Zero Mostel.  "It was always a challenge to try to draw someone who was, as a person, more exaggerated than what I do."  A few years later, I got a very similar answer when I put the same question to Mort Drucker, considered by many to be the best caricaturist of another generation.  (Mr. Hirschfeld said that folks kept mentioning the name of Drucker to him, but he was unfamiliar with the man's work.)

Mainly, I just found Al Hirschfeld to be a charming, delightful gent.  Last night, at the Academy, 1000+ people found that out, as well.  It's nice to see a man honored like that at what I'd like to think is the mid-point of his career.

By the way: If you are interested in purchasing signed lithographs or originals by Mr. Hirschfeld, you can contact his agents, the Margo Feiden Gallery at — you're way ahead of me — www.alhirschfeld.com.  There are also some wonderful pieces available for viewing on that site if you just want to Windows™-shop.

Celebrity Encounters

Like many folks who live in L.A., I am good at spotting celebrities as I go about my daily routine.  For some reason, I go through periods when I seem to run into the same ones over and over, and I occasionally find myself observing their public "performances."  For instance, years ago, wherever I went, there was Rip Taylor.  I saw him so many times in so many places, I figured it had to be some kind of franchise deal — you know, like Starbuck's or Mrs. Field's.  Somewhere, a company was telling people that for a modest investment, they could open their very own Rip Taylor.

I once eavesdropped on, and was impressed by, the way he handled an awkward situation with some tourists who sort of recognized him.  A couple from Dubuque (or wherever) began gushing over how much they loved him on TV and simply had to have his autograph…but as the lady fished out paper and something for him to write with, she said something that made it clear they both thought he was Paul Lynde.

Mr. Taylor did not show any sign of reaction, nor did he embarrass them by correcting their error directly.  He knew that once he signed, the issue would be unavoidable so he made like he hadn't heard what she'd said and then told them, "Thank you for not yelling my name out and attracting attention.  Sometimes people see me and they yell, 'It's Rip Taylor,' and everyone looks and it's embarrassing."  You could see the tourists' expressions change as they realized this was not Paul Lynde, and both made the too-obvious gesture of saying, "Thank you, Mr. Taylor," hoping he hadn't noticed their mistake.  But of course, he had…and he'd spared them a moment of humiliation.

Lately, I am unable to do any marketing without encountering Robert Klein and I am delighted to report that he is as funny and charming in the produce section of Gelson's as he is on stage.  He's currently doing the Bob Patterson show, which neither I nor most of America is watching.  Matter of fact, I suspect more people are seeing him in the market, where he jokes with other shoppers, greets folks who approach him with some tenuous connection ("My sister-in-law was the Production Assistant on your third HBO special") and makes no effort to either disguise who he is nor attract undue attention.  Nothing I overheard was quotable, even when he was behind me in the checkout line, paging through some tabloid and registering shock, if not at the headlines than at the fact that folks pay good money to read them.  Still, I have seen long-running TV shows that I thought were less entertaining than watching Robert Klein buy groceries.  I think it's a series.

Recommended Reading

Also, there was a recent article in Salon entitled "Bin Laden As Lex Luthor" in which writer Gale Holland attempted to view the world's new real super-villain as cut from the same mold as Superman's arch-nemesis. I don't really endorse the analogy (and told her that when she interviewed me for the piece) but, hey. I'll link to any piece that quotes me.

By the way: As I mentioned recently here, the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette has begun charging for on-line access, which means I can't read my favorite political columnist, Gene Lyons, at least for free. Fortunately, a thriving e-mail network has erupted so someone sends it to me each week…and the website, www.bartcop.com has started posting it regularly. Lyons' column appears Wednesday mornings so it'll probably turn up on Bartcop later that day.

I have no political observations this week. I'm battling a deadline and, even if I weren't, I think I'd be avoiding the news. From what I can tell, we're well into the category of Lotsa Scary Stuff, and the reporters have so much time to fill, they're making it sound like more of a crisis than it is, inflating by hours the six minutes of actual news they have to offer. And the White House may be launching the ground war just in time, insofar as keeping domestic support up and running. If they can't announce some sort of major "win" soon — i.e., we've arrested some major terrorist, bio or otherwise, or killed someone close to Bin Laden — the patience of certain right-wingers will be exhausted. We are long since past the stage where they'd be screaming about incompetence and possible impeachments, were they getting the same level of results from President Gore.

Curtain Call

My buddy Earl Kress noticed something interesting on Late Night With Conan O'Brien.  Not long ago, they unveiled a new set which shows a majestic New York skyline.  When the show returned to the air following the 9/11 tragedies, the skyline was draped in funereal cloth as if to suggest a city in mourning…a nice touch, but one that apparently had an additional purpose.  The folds in the cloth caused some segments of the skyline to be totally obscured and, if Earl's deduction is correct, the drape was placed carefully so that the folds covered the World Trade Center.  Its Twin Towers were right in the center of the skyline, situated such that it would have been in the background of every two-shot of Mr. O'Brien and whoever was in the guest chair.  Perhaps this was just a temp measure until they could have the backdrop repainted, or perhaps so they didn't want to immediately show the panorama minus the World Trade Center.  Whatever, the drape has now been lightened so it no longer obscures that area…and you can now see that the skyscrapers have been removed from the tableau.

In the meantime, the late night shows are struggling with what to rerun when they need to do this.  The Tonight Show will be dark next week and they're re-airing shows from earlier this month.  In fact, on 10/22, they're recycling the broadcast of 10/11, which already reran last week in the NBC Overnight slots.  That was a pretty good episode but three times in twelve days?

Creepy Book

I really enjoyed The Warren Companion, a new book from TwoMorrows Publishing, edited by Jon B. Cooke and David A. Roach, chronicling the company that brought us Creepy, Eerie, Vampirella, Famous Monsters of Filmland and many other intermittently-wonderful magazines from the sixties and seventies.  (Full Disclosure: I write a column for another TwoMorrows publication, The Jack Kirby Collector.)  Expanded from an issue of Comic Book Artist, this 288-page volume is filled with interviews with Jim Warren himself and many of those who contributed stories and/or artwork to his magazines over the years.  One does suspect that most parties are speaking nicer of one another than they might have, were their employer/employee relationships a more recent memory.

Still, the book does succeed in capturing a lot of what was, at the time, obviously unique to Warren Publishing.  Its monarch was a charismatic, mercurial entrepreneur whose long list of skills did not include going unnoticed.  Through determination and ingenuity — neither of which are intrinsic to most publishers — he built not only an empire but a new format for comics.  Others emulated with much less success, and I suspect the explanation is to be found in this historical overview: Others simply did not work as hard, and throw themselves into pioneering and nurturing a fragile marketplace as did Jim Warren.  Read all about it in this nifty new book.

Afghanistan? What the Heck?

I have no idea what changes, if any, the bombing will cause in Afghanistan but I am guardedly confident it will play out for the better. What I do fear is that we're in for some rabid domestic squalls over what kind of criticism, if any, constitutes treason. A certain, rather large section of the U.S. is dying to hear that we kicked the asses of those who brought down the World Trade Center and will consider it unpatriotic to suggest that any nugget of U.S. victory is less than total and honorable.

I have a rather cynical, but perhaps not inaccurate view of what drives our public debate and it often comes down to: Watch the Money. For a long time and perhaps still, there was cash to be made and careers to be built on Clinton-bashing. So we got a lot of Clinton-bashing. Those who hated Clinton got lots of attention and those who just mildly disliked him learned to hate him because it did wonders for their bank accounts and fame. Any viewpoint that gets authors on CNN and their books on the Amazon.com "hot 100" is a viewpoint we hear more of and it needn't even be a majority. It just has to be fervent and have buying power.

Right now, those who are eager for John Wayne's America, where the U.S. is always supreme in strength and purpose, are fervent and have buying power. Merchandising of the tragedy (and particularly, of its heroes) has already commenced and what's coming will make the current flag-gouging and tribute events look tasteful by comparison. The same consumers also have, or think they have the moral high ground to bash anyone who might question their vision. Look at how much grief they caused Bill Maher for remarks that should have passed for Fair Comment…and initially did, until a few yahoo radio personalities began misinterpreting them.

I actually think it's a hopeful sign that our government has so demonized Osama Bin Laden and has recently announced a "Most Wanted" list of 22 suspected terrorists. This is not the most logical reason but I'm recalling J. Edgar Hoover's old dictum to his FBI minions that no one should be placed on the "Most Wanted" list unless there was a reasonable expectation that they would be apprehended. And just as J. Edgar didn't want to be caught failing to capture anyone on his list, I don't think those who are controlling the U.S. anti-terrorist efforts want to define the enemy and then fail to defeat it. They must believe they have enough information and access to bring down Bin Laden and to bag most of the 22.

If and when they do, we're going to see a lot of parades and dancing in American streets. We'll probably be told that this proves we need to ban abortions, rescind all laws about gun ownership, investigate the Clintons some more and do away with the Capital Gains tax. And folks who for years have abhorred the concept of "political correctness," as applied to things like smoking and gender discrimination, will be out selling all the right-wing wet dreams as the will of Real Americans. One hopes that some loud voices will remind them that we are all Real Americans…especially those who respect the flag instead of wrapping it around their pet prejudices.