Today's Video Link

This is one I can't embed here but I'll give you a link to where you can go and view it, should you be so inclined.

Back in 1983 in the early days of cable TV, one of the best things I saw was a series called Likely Stories. For not-enough episodes, clever filmmakers got together with clever people and had a lot of freedom to produce clever short films. Most of what they did could not have appeared on mainstream television at the time.

The producer of the series was a gent named David Jablin who later became a friend of mine and one of the best of the many good things that appeared on his show was this: A 25-minute ersatz documentary about an ersatz film director named Seymour Z. Fishko who was played brilliantly by the (now, sadly) late Howard Hesseman. It was written by two of the best comedy writers around then or now, Michael Barrie and Jim Mulholland.

David tells me that he sent the script to Hesseman who loved it, agreed to do it and recommended his old friend Peter Bonerz to direct. You may remember that in my obit on Hesseman, I mentioned that he was a member of the innovative improv troupe, The Committee. Well, so was Peter Bonerz, who some of you may also know from The Bob Newhart Show.

The casting of the French reporter who is making this bogus film about Mr. Fishko was even easier. It turned out that Hesseman's lady friend at the time was Caroline DuCroq, who was a fine actress and by a neat coincidence, French. A few years after this film was made, she and Howard married and stayed that way for the rest of his life. She is now an important director and acting coach.

Also in the cast was my dear friend Angela Aames, who we lost at the way-too-young age of 32…and I still haven't quite gotten over that. Angela was a very good actress who in this film did a very good job of playing a not-very-good actress.

We have since seen a lot of what some call "mockumentaries" — emphasis on the "mock" — but this was made just before the most famous of them, This is Spinal Tap. Which come to think of it, also had Howard Hesseman in it.

David wrote me this morning to say that with the recent passing of its star, he's been getting a lot of inquiries about where one could see Focus on Fishko. That prompted him to put a copy online and he sent me the link in case I thought newsfromme readers would enjoy seeing it. I think newsfromme readers — especially those who appreciate mildly "adult" subject matter, would enjoy it so here's that link. I dunno how long he'll leave it there so if you want to see it, don't delay.

My Latest Tweet

  • Rudy Giuliani performing on The Masked Singer. Lately, every bit of political news sounds like a cold opening for Saturday Night Live.

Hear me, Hear me…

For an awful long time now, Robb Milne and Bryan Stratton have been delving into the history of Marvel Comics with their fine podcast, Marvel by the Month. This month, they have a guest who goes on and on and on about Jack Kirby.  You can listen to the show right here or if you become a Patreon supporter, you can hear a slightly-longer version of their conversation with Yours Truly…

Mushroom Soup Tuesday / Today's Video Link

I need a day or two away from this blog…from the entire Internet, actually. It's nothing serious. I just won't be as "here" as I usually am for a little while. You won't notice because I'll send you to something else online that is far more entertaining than anything you'll find here.

YouTube now has a Letterman Channel filled with authorized (it appears) clips from past David Letterman shows. What's more, they seem to all be from back when Dave was really, really good. Here's one of my favorite Top Ten lists which Dave presented with an assist from Mr. Top Ten himself, Casey Kasem…

You may disagree — in fact, I know folks who disagree — but I found Dave increasingly less fun to watch during his last decade or so on CBS. There were golden moments, sure, but I switched from TiVoing him each and every night to watching the best clips that showed up on YouTube. I also lost a lot of respect for the man for some of the things he did to his staff and his competition.

Never lost my respect for all the innovation and refurbishment he brought to the talk show format. Never lost my respect for his writers who I thought were some of the best to ever work in television. I know someone who dearly wants to believe that David Letterman ad-libbed every single thing he said on television for thirty-three years, even when he was reading it off cue cards. No, I don't think so.

But there was a point when I couldn't watch him every night any longer; when it felt like he didn't even want to be there. So it's nice to have this new channel, along with the many, many, Dave clips all over YouTube to remind us that when he was good, he was very, very good. I will embed more videos from that channel, I am sure, but you might want to go over there and browse all of what's there now. Back soon.

Tales of My Father #5

This article first appeared here on July 14, 2013. I've been waiting in vain for someone to offer me a bribe to run it again…

My father was a very honest man. Absolutely, utterly honest. Once, he found a wallet in the street with a few hundred dollars in it. He took it home, looked up the number of the person it belonged to and arranged to return it to them…with every buck still in it. He did things like that all the time. All the time.

In his role as an officer for the Internal Revenue Service, he was occasionally — very occasionally — offered bribes. The offerers of those bribes were foolish to try this. My father was not the kind of guy to go along with something like that…and even if he had been, there was very little he could do to "help" the offerer. He didn't have the power to tear up your tax bill or waive penalties or anything. About all he could do was to try extra-hard to not have his supervisors be too rough on you…and he did that anyway for most people.

There were, he heard, other I.R.S. agents who occasionally took bribes anyway. They'd grab the cash or, more often, some item of considerable value and tell the briber, "No promises but I'll see what I can do." And then they wouldn't do anything because, at least for those at or around my father's level in the operation, they couldn't do anything.

Once, a fellow who owed the Internal Revenue a few hundred thousand bucks offered my father a new car. It was not stated overtly as a quid pro quo. My father didn't have to do anything to get this new car but accept. Then, if he wanted to, (ahem!) he could maybe do whatever seemed appropriate to aid the fellow with his tax dilemma. Nudge, nudge.

My father said no. Even if there were no strings attached, he could not and would not accept anything of value from someone he had a case against. When the man tried to force the gift on him, my father reported it to his superiors and they took the appropriate action. This kind of thing happened three or four times in his career with the I.R.S. and he was not unique. No one in his office had ever been accused of accepting a bribe. Until one day, he was.

It came out of nowhere. He'd had a case against some guy who'd swindled the government out of millions. My father took it as far as he could, then it was reassigned to lawyers (my father was not a lawyer) higher-up in the I.R.S. to handle. At some point, the deadbeat began throwing out allegations that several I.R.S. agents, my father among them, had accepted large sums of cash or merchandise. I guess the premise here was that he'd drag the department through the mud until they agreed to drop the charges against him…or something.

taxform

My father was shocked, angered and even a bit worried. He knew he'd done no such thing but until it could be verified, he didn't sleep too well.

Vindication took about two months. A special investigator was appointed and he went through all my father's finances — checking account, bank account, etc. It was a much more thorough audit than the I.R.S. ever performed on a civilian and it even extended to me. To make sure that no bribe money had been paid to him via his spouse or son, they had us turn over all of our records, as well. A forensic accountant (I think that's what he called himself) at an outside agency received the data, then phoned me up several times to ask questions like, "What was this $300 you earned the first week of August for?" I told him in that instance, "That was for an issue I wrote of the Daffy Duck comic book." He was amused by my sources of income but it all checked out.

All of the accused Internal Revenue employees were cleared and their accuser wound up doing hard time. The matter was over but my father had a hard time letting it be over.

A few weeks later, he was talking about having some work done on his car and he said, "Guess I'll have to postpone it until I have the dough." Making a joke I immediately wished I could take back, I said, "Hey, why don't you use some of that bribe money you have stashed away?" He gave me a look that clearly indicated he didn't find that funny. I apologized and never made reference to it again.

But he'd bring the matter up every so often. He had been totally cleared but somehow, that wasn't enough. I think he wanted the investigators to do more than say, "There is no evidence that Bernard Evanier ever accepted cash or any item of value from his accuser." He wanted them to issue a statement that said something like, "Not only didn't Bernie Evanier take a bribe but our investigation has determined he is the most honest I.R.S. agent ever and anyone who thinks he'd do something like that is out of their friggin' mind!" I'm not sure even that would have gotten him to stop talking about it.

I don't mean he spoke of it all the time but it had a way of coming up, even after he retired from the agency. He'd be discussing the Lakers and what a lousy season they were having and suddenly, out of nowhere, he'd make some odd connection like, "People keep accusing Kareem Abdul-Jabbar of not doing more on defense. That's as ridiculous as that guy accusing me of taking a bribe."

My father's best friend in that I.R.S. office was a fellow named Howard…a real nice man, I thought. They had lunch almost every day when my father worked in the office and they switched to every Wednesday after he retired. Howard, who still worked there, would come by and pick him up and off they'd go to some deli or sometimes for Chinese. Howard would report on the latest doings in the office and my father would mutter something about that crook who'd accused several of them. Howard, who had not been among those accused, would tell him to drop it, forget it, get over it. This went on through years and years of Wednesday lunches.

Then one Wednesday, Howard didn't show up for their usual date: No Howard. No call. No nothing. I had moved out of the family home by then but I happened to be there visiting. I asked him, "Are you sure he didn't tell you he had to skip this week for some reason?"

"No, no," my father said. "Last Wednesday when he dropped me off, I distinctly remember him saying, 'See you next week!'" I suggested he call the office and he did. He called and reached a secretary there he knew very well, then asked if Howard had come into work that morning.

"Didn't he tell you?" she asked. "Didn't anyone tell you?"

"Tell me what?"

She said, "Howard was fired after he was convicted last year of taking a bribe. We heard he surrendered on Monday and began serving his prison sentence."

"Stunned" does not begin to describe my father's reaction. He practically went into a sensory coma. Howard had been indicted almost two years before and placed on suspension. He'd been through a trial where he was found guilty, then been through a few unsuccessful appeals before giving up and telling people, "Yeah, I did it."

For the last few months, he'd been well aware of the date when he would be tossed in the slammer for two-to-five years. And still, every Wednesday, he came by, took my father to lunch and told him what was up with the folks at the office where he actually hadn't worked in over a year. Not a word about being on trial, being convicted, being sentenced to prison…any of it. They just sat at Nate n' Al's Delicatessen and talked about the Lakers.

We found out Howard was doing his stretch in the California Institute for Men in Chino. That's about an hour's drive east of Los Angeles. I told my father that if he wanted to go visit Howard, I'd drive him out there some day, maybe even a Wednesday. He thought about it for a second and then said, "No…I'm not sure I could look him in the face. And with my luck, he's probably sharing a cell with that prick who accused me of taking a bribe!"

Grail Money

I'm receiving quite a few answers to my question about the financing of Monty Python and the Holy Grail. No two estimates are the same which apparently has much to do with the fact that the value of Pounds Sterling fluctuated a lot in 1975. So how much it cost then has a lot to do with when in 1975 the money was spent.

But all the estimates so far are between 1.8 and 2.1 million dollars. That's close enough for me, thanks.

Today's Video Link

From The Ed Sullivan Show for February 26, 1956, Bob Fosse (yes, Bob Fosse) performs with Carol Haney. At the time, she was appearing in the original Broadway production of The Pajama Game which he had choreographed…

My Latest Tweet

  • Trump keeps saying that Mike Pence had the power to overturn the results of the 2020 election. If so, that means that if Donald runs against Biden in 2024 and gets more electoral votes, Kamala Harris has the power to declare Biden re-elected.

Idle Curiosity

Eric Idle posted this on Twitter and I thought it ought to be saved somewhere for future researchers…

The Holy Grail film was financed thusly
Michael White Limited £78,750.00
Led Zeppelin £31,500.00
Island Records £21,000.00
Pink Floyd Music £21,000.00
Charisma Records £5,250.00
Heartaches (Tim Rice) £5,250.00
Chrysalis Records £6,300.00
Ian Anderson £6,300.00
Total £175,350.00

Can someone more facile with numbers than I am convert the total amount in 1975 Brit money to 2022 Yank money?

Howard Hesseman, R.I.P.

The already-way-too-long list of funny recently-deceased men grows one longer with the addition of Howard Hesseman, who has died at the age of 81. Complications resulting from colon surgery, they're saying.

I probably don't have to tell anyone who ever watched WKRP in Cincinnati how good Mr. Hesseman was in it, though I might have to tell people who never watched WKRP how good it was or which one is him in the above photo.

For reasons I explained here, I was a fan of it even before it went on the air. Howard Hesseman was one of the main reasons. And I was a fan of his even before he was on that show. There were a lot of improv comedy shows happening in Los Angeles back then, many of them featuring former members of The Committee in San Francisco or Second City in Chicago. Hesseman seemed to be in all those shows and he was always brilliantly hilarious.

This obit will tell you how many other TV shows and movies he was in and it may surprise you. It surprised me…but maybe it shouldn't have. He was really good at what he did.

Maus Keeping

I have a bunch of e-mailed requests to comment on the current controversy about Art Spiegelman's graphic novel, Maus. It's been quite some time since I read it but I recall the following: Many, many people in the comic art community were raving about it. When I finally got around to it, I wasn't as impressed as they were and didn't quite "get" the analogies of Jews to mice and Nazis to cats. But I thought it was an honest effort and if it was that meaningful to so many people, fine. I don't have to love something to recognize that it has value in the world.

In fact, Art invited me to lunch one day because, I think, he wanted me to explain to him the appeal of Jack Kirby's work. I'm pretty sure I didn't give him a satisfactory (to him) answer and it pretty much came down to me saying that he didn't have to love something to recognize that it had value in the world. To me, the salient principle is that the taste of one person or one group should never be the reason to deny something to those of opposite taste. I am not really in favor of outlawing cole slaw even though I and all decent people find it repulsive.

If I still had Art's number, I'd call and congratulate him on this latest "banning" because it sure has helped his sales and drawn a lot of attention to a work that many had forgotten. Sergio and I oughta figure out a way to get Groo the Wanderer "banned" somewhere…especially if it can be "banned," as Art's book has, and still be readily available everywhere except where it's sold out.

I'm putting "banned" in quotes because I think that word oughta be reserved for when something is actually banned, not merely deselected. When Lorne Michaels decides not to have a certain star host Saturday Night Live again, the Internet erupts with the news that that star has been "banned" from SNL. When Costco decides not to sell a certain book on that table where they sell a microscopic percentage of all the books published, its author complains that their book has been "banned by Costco."

Maus is not banned. It's selling better than it has in years. Isn't that kind of the direct opposite of banning something?

From the articles I've seen, it seems like the Tennessee school district did not "ban" Maus. No copies were burned. No booksellers were threatened with jail time if they sold it. The Board merely removed it from the curriculum of books to be taught in their schools. I'm not sure how School Boards select and update those lists but I would assume books are constantly moved on and off them…especially since I've heard that new books continue to be written.

It seems pretty silly to take one off for the stated reasons. Someone is bothered by one drawing of a dead nude cartoon mouse and a couple of naughty words in an account of a true obscenity in The History of Mankind? Wow. That's what bothered them?

What I'm thinking right now is this: Some people — and I'm not saying this is surely the motive of the 10-member McMinn County School Board — want to soft-pedal The Holocaust and deny or trivialize it. If a controversy like the one about Maus can remind us of the danger of that, maybe Art Spiegelman's book was more important than I thought.

The Rumble

My pal Ken Levine recently received a screener DVD of the new Spielberg-directed West Side Story, watched it and wrote a review on his blog. I recently received a screener DVD of the new Spielberg-directed West Side Story, watched it and now I'm going to send you over to read his review. I haven't seen Into the Heights so I can't compare the two films as Ken does but otherwise, I share his take on this West Side Story.

Great cinematography and editing. Some stellar performances. Superb art direction.

But it's still West Side Story. As Ken says, "So who are these guys? Broadway theatre kids or an ugly mob? I don't know how they could be both." Well, they are both. In fact, they're well-choreographed Broadway theatre kids even when they're trying to kill each other. On a stage, things aren't so literal. You play along and pretend there are 76 trombones up there or that you can't see the wire making Peter Pan fly. In a movie, you're in a real setting. You don't forgive the wire as easily.

And as I said of the 1961 movie of West Side Story, "It's one of those films where I find myself thinking, 'This is really well-made but I'm having trouble caring about those characters.' The one time I saw the musical staged live, I admired the heck out of the dancing, the singing and the music but, again, didn't get deep into the story."

I didn't then. I didn't this time. And I was reminded that the ending is a tremendous downer…which may be another reason some people didn't go see this new version. I think the folks who made this movie — it felt like there were thousands listed in the end-credits — did the best-possible version of the material anyone could do. But I still just sat here admiring the skills involved in making it all happen and never got into the characters and what they were doing and why.

Today's Video Link

As I've mentioned here before, one of my favorite pieces of music is the last movement from Mozart's Piano Sonata No. 11, often known as "Alla Turca" or "The Turkish Rondo." I have recordings of it with a wide array of orchestrations but my favorites are when one person plays it on one piano. Like this…

Tales From Kmart

This article ran here on May 19, 2011. The Kmart of which I write is long gone from my neighborhood. The building actually turned into a museum of Britney Spears memorabilia before it closed for COVID and it's still shut tight.

Why did it stop being a Kmart?  Because as we've discussed occasionally on this blog, Kmart and its sister company Sears have been mismanaged into near-oblivion.  Once upon a time, there were 2,486 Kmarts in the world.  Today, there are about a dozen.  This piece may also suggest a reason for their decline…

My cleaning lady told me we were all out of Lysol. I said I'd pick some up and I forgot when I was at the market the other day. So I stopped this morning at the closest place to get some, which was a nearby Kmart.

In the parking lot, which also serves a CVS Pharmacy, a Whole Foods and a few other businesses, I ran into a lady I knew who used to have a high position at the NBC Network. We made small talk which got smaller when I mentioned I was on my way into the Kmart. She looked at me like I'd just said I was about to go down to Skid Row and bunk with the homeless people. "Why would you ever go into a Kmart?" she asked…and "To buy Lysol" turned out to not be much of an answer.

"It's just…" and here she was having trouble finding the words to express why that was wrong. The point was so obvious to her that it went without saying. Finally, she said, "Kmart is for the kind of people who'd shop at Kmart."

Well, hard to argue with that. I said, "I need some Lysol. They sell Lysol. What's wrong with going there to buy it?"

She pointed to the other end of the mall and said, "They probably have Lysol at the CVS store."

I said, "Yes…and it's the exact same Lysol and it's probably not any cheaper down there, plus the Kmart is closer."

When I noted it was the same Lysol, I suddenly reminded myself of something. Ten or fifteen years ago, I had to buy a small household appliance. I checked out Consumer Reports and they recommended a certain brand and a certain model. Let's say it was the Acme 74W. The next day, I was passing that Kmart and I ducked in to see if they had it. They didn't but they had the Acme 74X. I thought, "Well, how different could that be?" and I bought it.

Which turned out to be a mistake. It was a terrible product. I phoned up the Customer Service folks at the Acme Company (not the same one that makes Road Runner traps) and asked if I'd gotten a defective item or I didn't understand how to use it or what. I got an uncommonly honest person on the phone who told me basically that I'd purchased their crappy version. The 74W was a fine product. The 74X was a piece of junk.

"You should have looked at the price," she said. "The 74W is $65. Places like Kmart can't or don't want to sell it to their clientele so we designed the 74X for them. You probably paid about thirty bucks for it."

I looked at my Kmart receipt which I'd pulled out for possible returning purposes. "I paid $29.98," I told her. She said, "Well, there you are. I mean, it's a good thirty dollar appliance but it's like paying less than half of what you have to spend to buy a decent meal. Some people can't afford anything better. That's why they have the Value Menu at McDonald's."

I took her point. The $30 appliance went back to Kmart for a refund and I found the 74W online for $50 and ordered it. It worked fine.

If I'd been the Acme Company — which actually has a famous name, one you'd probably know — I don't think I'd be putting my brand on cheapo merchandise. I might service that marketplace with products under another trademark but I don't think I'd devalue my reputation by applying it to intentionally low-grade products. But that's another matter. Standing there in the parking lot, talking with the lady who used to work at NBC, I thought, She's right in a way. She's just not right about this particular example. They don't make a cheaper grade of Lysol.

At least, I don't think they do. The bottle I ended up buying said on it, "Kills All Germs!" not "Kills Some Germs and Not Others!"

She didn't want to shop at Kmart because of some sort of snobbishness. I don't mind shopping there but I've learned to be cautious of the mindset that the cheapest alternative is always the one you should buy, which is sometimes the dynamic you get in a place like Kmart.

But not always. Not long ago in a men's store, I found a kind of pajama that I really like. A pair was $40 and I'd been meaning to go back there and buy a couple more next time I'm in that area. Now I don't have to. While carrying my other purchase out of Kmart, I passed through their men's clothing section and found the same pajamas — and I mean exactly the same — for $19.95.

I just told this story on the phone to a friend of mine who remarked, "Great…but what if it turns out the $19.95 pajamas are so cheap because the people who make them in some primitive country have a deadly disease and it's transmitted through the material?" I thought for a second and replied, "Well, I guess that's what the Lysol is for…"

Ron, Remembered

A nice obit for Ron Goulart in The New York Times. We may never know how many books that man wrote but it's more than most people have read.