This is mostly about comic books but it has a little something to do with Donald Trump. These days, just about everything has at least a little something to do with Donald Trump.
Most comic books are created via a small assembly line: One person writes the script. One person draws it out in pencil. One person handles the lettering. One person finishes the pencil art in ink. One person handles the coloring. One person is the editor, coordinating all of this. Sometimes, one person does two or more of these things and sometimes, there's a slightly different division of the labor. But this is roughly how it works.
Sometimes, these people get along well together and all respect each other's contributions. Sometimes, they don't like what the others do but they don't all have the clout or opportunity to adjust things more to their liking. This was especially true of the creative talents who did comics before around 1990 and especially of those who grew up in the Great Depression. Jack Kirby, for example, had a great respect for the other guy's need to make a living even if he didn't know the other guy. So if he thought the inker hired to embellish his pencil art was not the greatest, he often said nothing. He also didn't then think inking mattered that much, though he would later change his mind about that.
Only once or twice in his long career, did he politely ask if an inker could be switched to some other project. To the best of my knowledge, there were only two times when he insisted on a change and even those were after making sure that the inkers in question would get other work and not lose income.
Many of Jack's fellow artists were unhappy with the skills or casting of their collaborators — pencilers who disliked what their inkers did and inkers who didn't care for the pencil art assigned to them — and some in their later years were a bit more vocal about this. I've interviewed most of the artists who drew for DC or Marvel between, oh, about 1960 and 1985. Often, I've interviewed them at comic book conventions in rooms that held hundreds of their fans. Whether I ask Penciler A about it or not, it comes out that he really disliked what was done to his artwork when it was finished by Inker B. And sometimes, the feeling was mutual.
And what has happened a number of times when such an statement has made its way into print or online has been that some lover of that work refuses to believe it.
I have been accused of fabricating the quote or of somehow poisoning the mind of Penciler A about Inker B or there has to be some sort of typo or transcription error. The accuser loves that work so much that he refuses to believe Penciler A said any such thing.
Maybe I drugged the guy and made him my hypnotic slave but…well, I'll give you an example. Three times, I interviewed longtime Marvel artist John Buscema, whose work there was inked by dozens of different inkers over the years. Each chat we had — and I believe he said this in other interviews, as well — Mr. Buscema stated that he liked the inking done on his pencil art by his brother Sal and he liked the inking done by Frank Giacoia…and apart from himself, he didn't like anybody else. Once or twice, he specifically named inkers who he thought were either spectacular mismatches for his style or were spectacularly lacking in talent.
There's a fellow who writes me about every six months about this. I've been ignoring his last few e-mails but will excerpt from the most recent…
The first time I wrote you about this, you assured me Buscema felt that way about Alfredo Alcala inking him and you referred me to a published interview. I still do not believe this. Yes, my eyes read the interview but my eyes also see the supreme beauty of Conan as penciled by John Buscema and inked by Alfredo Alcala. It is obviously not only the best artwork that ever bore Buscema's credit but some of the best comic art ever published. Every panel is a masterpiece. Every figure is perfect. There is no way John Buscema was not thrilled with every bit of it no matter what some obviously-phony interview says.
Now, understand: I am not debating the merits of Buscema/Alcala work. I rather liked it myself and if someone didn't…well, they're entitled to their opinion even if they aren't John Buscema. But he was entitled to his too and it's a fact, not an opinion, that he said what he said. Neither I nor anyone else has any motive to fake this.
I also liked when Carmine Infantino's or Gil Kane's art was inked by Murphy Anderson but it's a fact that none of those three men were happy with those marriages and many others. Gil Kane didn't like most of his inkers although many of his fans loved certain pairings.
I'm kinda amazed by how much denial there is about this.