The New York Times/Siena College poll — which has a margin of error of plus or minus 2.4 points — says Harris/Walz is three points ahead of Trump/Vance. That ain't bad news but it's still closer than it oughta be. If you look around, you can easily find one that shows either ticket in a better position.
Jonathan Chait argues that Harris is running a terrific campaign by being more centrist than a lot of her supporters would like.
Ed Kilgore explains how the Trump campaign is trying to twist and exploit the hurricanes ravaging the southeast.
And Ed Kilgore (him again) lists all the different things that the Trump campaign claims constitute "Election Interference." It's pretty much anything that anyone says against voting for Trump.
I don't imagine anyone visiting this site needs to hear any additional reasons to vote for the Harris/Walz ticket. If you're not going to by now, you're probably not going to. But just in case, here's another one that they'll probably claim is "Election Interference"…