For those of you who like the political-type articles I occasionally link here, I have one for you. John Harris of the Washington Post recently published this piece about how the press is treating Bush, as opposed to how they treated Clinton, and why. Here's one chunk that jumped out at me:
The truth is, this new president has done things with relative impunity that would have been huge uproars if they had occurred under Clinton. Take it from someone who made a living writing about those uproars.
Harris covered the Clinton White House for years, wrote many stories about scandals therein…and is now saying that the current Washington press is not holding Bush to the same standard. I suspect he's right — but he won't be, for long.