Haven't spoken to anyone this evening but the word across the 'net is that the Producers are holding firm on the following position: That there will be no increase for Writers in DVDs and they define "DVD" as including when your show is downloaded via the Internet, and they probably define it to include several other forms of delivery, as well. Furthermore, the AMPTP is saying, until the WGA drops its demands in that area, there will be no movement on any other part of the contract.
The WGA is unwilling to drop that. Our leaders certainly are not…and while I'll know more about the mood of the membership after tomorrow night's big meeting, I suspect the rank 'n' file are overwhelmingly in the same place on this.
Which means we're looking at a strike, probably but not necessarily as of tomorrow night.
I've received a number of e-mails — some from writers but mostly from folks who are not in the WGA — asking if I can briefly summarize what the conflict is all about. I believe I can and will attempt to do so in the following two sentences…
There's a ton of money being made in DVDs and other forms of home video and these amounts are expected to skyrocket. For as long as possible, the Producers want to keep as much of it as possible for themselves.
Believe it or not, there really isn't much more to it than that. What's more, regardless of what they may say in public, everyone involved knows that that's what this is about.
You'll hear and read a lot about recoupment and softness in traditional markets and deficit financing and all sorts of biz-babble and some of it may even be true. But it's by and large irrelevant to the core of the situation, which is that the companies want to maximize profits and the people who run them want to maximize their own personal take-home pay and bonus moola. They don't want to say that even though everyone knows that…so they put up the smoke and mirrors and say, "Gee, we'd love to cut you guys in for a better piece but there are all these complicated business-type reasons why we can't." The folks explaining that do not buy it for one second when it comes time to negotiate their own compensation but, you know, this is how the game is played.
Do not believe there's anything going on here other than the situation I just summarized. Yeah, there are issues about respect and creative controls and minority hiring and screen credits and a number of other things, and I'm not suggesting they don't matter. They matter a lot but they don't matter enough for either side to allow a strike to happen over them.
To underscore that point: As I was typing the above paragraph, I received my copy of tonight's mass e-mailing from WGA Prez Patric Verrone. It says, in part…
After three and a half months of bargaining, the AMPTP still has not responded to a single one of our important proposals. Every issue that matters to writers, including Internet reuse, original writing for new media, DVDs, and jurisdiction, has been ignored. This is completely unacceptable.
It's also completely typical, as you'll see if you read back through some of my past postings on the subject.
This will be my fourth (or is it fifth?) strike since I joined the WGA. In every one, I've lost something…some important project went away, some break broke. On the other hand, I've done okay through them because my income has never been wholly dependent on work that the WGA covers. The real pains have come from the distraction, the emotions, the politics and labor of striking, and the holding of hands (figuratively) of friends who are frightened or hurting. I believe that some of those 4-5 strikes were mismanaged from our side but on the separate question of whether any given strike was warranted, I never felt we had a choice. I don't see that we have one this time.