The Mail Must Get Through!

At the moment, if you send me an e-mail, I will receive it but you will receive a response that tells you your message to me could not be delivered. I don't know why it's doing this but I wish it would stop.

My Tweets from Yesterday

  • Gingrich to announce Wednesday that he's staying in the presidential race but suspending his marriage. 12:11:12
  • The census says only 48% of U.S. households have a husband AND a wife. Gays aren't destroying "traditional marriage." Straights are. 12:14:29
  • Today's potatoes are from Circle C Ranch in Hamer, ID. And I'll bet they were packed by a guy named Luke. 20:14:18

Today's Video Link

Here's a one-minute promo for The Dick Van Dyke Show featuring the four stars out of character. It's so odd hearing Mary Tyler Moore address him as Dick instead of Rob…

Recommended Reading

I said earlier that there are aspects of the White House Correspondents' Dinner that make me uncomfy. They're pretty well summarized by Alex Pareene, who thinks it's all about shmoozing, Hollywood style. I don't go for that in Hollywood and I expect better of Washington.

By the way, people keep calling this thing the Nerd Prom and arguing that that's what you call the Comic-Con in San Diego. I'm really sick of the word "nerd" and feel it's one of those words (like "diva") that gets used so casually and thoughtlessly that it's pretty much lost any meaning it once had. How is any event attended by George Clooney and Jon Hamm a "nerd anything?"

Wikipedia, which given its contributors oughta know, defines "nerd" as "…a derogatory slang term for a person typically described as socially-impaired, obsessive, or overly intellectual." And first, let's pause to note the unfortunate state of a society in which being intellectual evokes a derogatory slang term. But these days, who isn't socially-impaired to some extent and are folks who go to Comic-Con any more so than the norm? I don't think so. I think they are the norm. And if we're all nerds then no one is a nerd…if you follow me.

But I really don't know what the word means anymore and won't unless someone can point out to me a sizable constituency to which the word does not apply. Or is it just the few, like Clooney and Hamm, who are wildly successful and sexually-attractive?

Recommended Reading

By now, you know the drill: Barack Obama does X. G.O.P. leaders (John McCain, especially) rush to the microphones to condemn him for doing X, to argue that it is shameless and immoral to do X, that the mere fact this man has done X is reason enough to kick him out of the Oval Office…

…and then with very little research necessary, reporters find plenty of examples of George W. Bush and other prominent Republicans (often, the sainted Reagan, himself) not only doing X but often doing 2X or 3X.

Latest example: Bragging about taking out Osama and suggesting that Romney wouldn't have had the guts to make that call.

Obama should announce he's picking Sarah Palin as his Vice-President this time around. She would of course doom his campaign but it might be fun to see McCain rush out and talk about how any man who'd do such a thing is unfit to serve.

Another Thing I Don't Understand…

So Rick Santorum made this silly statement a few weeks ago, saying that our colleges had deteriorated to the point where none of the University of California schools offered classes in U.S. History. A number of voices, but mainly that of Rachel Maddow, pointed out that this is not true; that plenty of U.S. History courses have always been available at those schools and still are. Weeks later, Santorum sent the following message to Ms. Maddow…

Rachel, on a recent show you discussed a statement I made that American history was not being taught at a number of California state universities. You questioned the accuracy of my statement. Based upon your broadcast I went back and reviewed the facts. It's clear that my memory about what was taught was faulty. What I should have said was that none of the UC campuses teach a survey course in Western Civilization. Rachel, I appreciate your efforts pointing out my misstatement, and for giving me the opportunity to set the record straight.

Rick Santorum

And of course, he's wrong again. As Maddow pointed out on her show the other night, those schools also have plenty of survey courses on Western Civilization. This, they confirmed with a few minutes of Googling.

I really don't get this. If you're Rick Santorum and you're issuing an apology like this, you have to know it's going to make it to the air and be fact-checked. Don't you turn to an intern or someone and say, "Hey, before I send this out, call up the University of California and make sure they don't offer courses in Western Civilization so I don't look like an idiot again"? And there were people who wanted this man to have the job where you get to order a nuclear attack.

Recommended Reading

North Carolina is about to vote on an amendment to their state constitution that would enshrine their ban on Gay Marriage in a firmer manner. A local writer named Tommy Tomlinson wrote a simple argument against the amendment that makes a strong case. If you know someone who thinks the drive to allow same-sex wedlock is just a commie plot by them Godless Hollywood Liberals, have them read this little essay.

Sign of the Times

I hang out a lot at a wonderful place called Farmers Market at the corner of 3rd and Fairfax here in Los Angeles. Farmers Market is full of restaurants and folks who sell produce and other edible things…so you'd figure there'd be no need around there for any other business that would sell you a nectarine. But no. Farmers Market is on the northeast corner and over on the southeast corner, there's a Whole Foods Market.

This has not made traffic completely impossible in the neighborhood. With much patience, it is still possible to get through that intersection, especially if you don't mind waiting through five or six cycles of the stoplights. In order to fully immobilize transit, they're about to open a Trader Joe's on the northwest corner.

The buzz was that it would open at the end of March 2012 and I'm getting skeptical that will happen. It's looking like the first week or two of May. As of last Friday, it was not a Trader Joe's yet. As you can see by the photo I took, it was just a Tr.

Assuming they add the "ader's Joe" this coming week, it might open soon…and I will shop there but I should warn you of something. Here's how it works for me with Trader Joe's…

  1. I find something I like.
  2. I go back to buy more of it.
  3. I find out they don't make it anymore.

I'm not exaggerating.  Trader Joe's has a fluid, constantly-changing list of products.  As you may know, they make none of what they sell.  They buy it from little (sometimes, big) companies, slap the Trader Joes label on it and sell it in their stores.  And once they add a new item, they keep it in their lineup until I buy it and like it.  Someone at Trader Joe's HQ runs into the boss's office and says, "We just got a report from L.A.!  Mark Evanier just bought a package of those turkey meatballs we added last November."

"Oh, I'm sorry to hear that.  I really like those and so do a lot of people.  They're selling quite well."

"I like them too but you know the Company Policy."

"I know, I know.  Okay, give the order to stop making them.  He didn't order any of the peanut cole slaw, did he?"

"Of course not.  You know Evanier hates cole slaw!"

"Good.  It's one of the few things we carry that's safe!"

You think I'm kidding about this?  Wait'll the place opens.  I'll go, I report on what I buy and what I like.  I'll report on what happens when I go back and try to buy more of the products I like.  You'll see.

Idle Chatter

My friend Dave Schwartz (one of thousands of Dave Schwartzes I know) informs me that he went to see What About Dick? last night and the evening did not close with "The Dick Anthem," the song it closed with on the first night when I saw it. Instead, they did a reprise of a tongue-twister tune that Billy Connolly sang to close the first act. So they seem to have cut the title song, the one you can hear a bit of in this video.

I'm a little curious to see what becomes of this show. I assume there will be a cable special and/or DVD of what's playing through tonight down at the Orpheum in downtown L.A. But what else? At first thought, you'd figure this was a chance to test out the material and maybe then do a rewrite for a longer-running production somewhere…but I'm thinking that wouldn't make a lot of sense. Testing the play out with a cast like that isn't going to tell you much about how it will fare without Mr. Connolly, Ms. Ullman, Mr. Izzard, etc. And if you have this DVD out, people are going to go expecting that play, not the rewrite. Someone who has a small theater group in Oregon wrote to ask me if I thought this play would be good for his company to do sometime. The answer is I don't have a clue. We weren't listening to the play. We were watching Mr. Connolly, Ms. Ullman, Mr. Izzard, etc. So I don't know what, if anything, lies ahead for it. But it sure was fun to see last Thursday night.

Today's Video Link

This runs an hour so you probably won't want to watch it through to conclusion. But you might enjoy a few minutes of a live TV presentation of one of my favorite plays, June Moon by Ring Lardner and George S. Kaufman. The original production, directed by Mr. Kaufman, debuted on Broadway in October of 1929. It's the story of an idealistic young writer of song lyrics who meets up with reality (and romance) when he goes to New York and its famed Tin Pan Alley.

The play was a modest success and represented a personal high point for Lardner, who was and still is hailed as one of America's great humorous writers. His career was mostly in sports writing and short stories and having a play on Broadway was a long-held dream. He hoped to do more but died in 1933 before that could happen.

This TV version was done on June 2, 1949. The play has been chopped down to an hour but other than that, they don't seem to have done great damage to it and some of the performances are quite good. The first actor you see on your screen is a (then) newcomer named Jack Lemmon. He would go onto bigger and better things…

After Dinner Remarks

Jimmy Kimmel did better than I'd expected at the White House Correspondents Dinner last night, especially in the first half of his act. I got the feeling after about twenty minutes that he was wishing he'd been a bit more ruthless in editing out some of the weaker gags which were bunched up just where you don't want to have them: Near the end. I'll watch it again in a few days and I expect to like it more.

Another problem he had was following Obama, who scored big comedically and maybe to some extent, politically. I'm not sure who supplied his material, though I seem to recall hearing that his speech last year had been cobbled together by the staff of The Daily Show. I don't think we should judge our elected officials by how well they can do stand-up but it doesn't hurt when they do it well.

I am informed by many, by the way, that Jon Stewart performed at the dinner in 1997. Obviously, he's been asked to return. Obviously, he said no. I'd be curious to know why.

Break-In Breathrough?

Ron Rosenbaum resurrects a topic that not many care about these days but I do: Watergate. His particular question is whether it is provable that Richard M. Nixon, the 37th President of these United States, ordered the infamous break-in that failed and thus destroyed his presidency.

As a longtime wallower, I would say the evidence is almost airtight that Nixon knew that kind of thing was being done even if he didn't know the specifics of where and when. And there's pretty solid evidence that he did at least know where.

However, a lot of those who've addressed this matter seem to be operating from the view that there had to have been a specific area of information that the wiretaps were intended to collect; i.e., what did Democratic Party Chairman Larry O'Brien know about Nixon's financial dealings with Howard Hughes? Well, maybe. But I could sure accept that they wanted to spy on the opposition just to find out what, if anything, the opposition was up to.

Old L.A. Restaurants: Helms Bakery

Helms Bakery wasn't really a restaurant but it's my website.  I can write about it here if I want to.

The Helms Bakery Building still stands on Venice Boulevard with much of its signage still intact…but inside, they bake no bread or cinnamon buns.  It's a furniture mart in there now but once upon a time beginning when Paul Helms founded the business in 1931, they made bread and sugar cookies and rolls and cupcakes and all the things that great bakeries bake.  Then nice men would load them into their Helms Bakery Trucks and drive about surrounding neighborhoods, selling them to housewives and kids.

If you wanted the Helms Man to stop at your residence, you had to, first of all, put the Helms placard up in your front window…although a good Helms Man knew his territory, knew that certain homes expected him whether they had the sign up or not.  He'd pull up in front and blow his distinctive whistle and you'd scurry out to his truck and buy stuff. Inside the truck, he had drawers full of cookies and donuts and rolls and I think they even carried milk and butter, though at somewhat higher prices than the nearby Safeway Market.

When I was very young, you could often find me waiting outside our home for the Helms Man.  We had a rough idea of when he'd get to our street and I'd go play out front, keeping an eye out for the guy.  When he approached, it was very exciting and I'd run in and get my mother.  She'd buy a loaf of bread and maybe some rolls and always at least a cookie for me.  Actually, the first thing our Helms Man would do when we stepped up inside his truck to make our purchases was to hand me a free cookie, usually one of their terrific sugar cookies.

Once, I got to go inside the plant thanks to an L.A. City School District program of field trips.  We all piled into buses which drove us over to Culver City for a tour.  Upon arrival, we were marched through the place and shown how the bread was baked, how the cookies were mixed and formed on large conveyor belts…and you couldn't help but love how great it smelled in there.  The aroma was heavenly and a whole lot better than the tuna cannery or the dairy we toured on other field trips.  On the way out, each student received a small loaf of bread and a little cardboard Helms Truck.

I'm not sure why the business model was as successful for as long as it was. As mentioned, the prices on the Helms Truck were always somewhat higher than buying roughly the same things at a Safeway or Von's, and you'd have to go to one of those markets anyway to get the other things you needed. Why not get your bread and cookies at Von's while you were there and save a few bucks? Whatever the reason was to opt for the trucks, it seems to have faded out by the late sixties. Maybe there were fewer mothers staying at home all day or something. Maybe the quality of baked goods at the markets had improved. Whatever the cause, the whole operation shut down in 1969 and I still remember the day its trucks made their last, melancholy rounds.  There was a real sense of loss when our Helms Man drove off, having sold us our rolls and sugar cookies for the last time.

The big building on Venice Boulevard sat vacant for a few years and rumors abounded as to what would become of it.  In 1972, it was acquired by a real estate firm that soon began its transformation into a complex of furniture dealers…and even a little jazz club called The Jazz Bakery.  Happily, as noted, they kept a lot of the old Helms Bakery decor intact and sometimes when you drive past it, you can almost imagine you're smelling the sugar cookies, fresh out of those huge ovens.