WGA Stuff

Haven't spoken to anyone this evening but the word across the 'net is that the Producers are holding firm on the following position: That there will be no increase for Writers in DVDs and they define "DVD" as including when your show is downloaded via the Internet, and they probably define it to include several other forms of delivery, as well. Furthermore, the AMPTP is saying, until the WGA drops its demands in that area, there will be no movement on any other part of the contract.

The WGA is unwilling to drop that. Our leaders certainly are not…and while I'll know more about the mood of the membership after tomorrow night's big meeting, I suspect the rank 'n' file are overwhelmingly in the same place on this.

Which means we're looking at a strike, probably but not necessarily as of tomorrow night.

I've received a number of e-mails — some from writers but mostly from folks who are not in the WGA — asking if I can briefly summarize what the conflict is all about. I believe I can and will attempt to do so in the following two sentences…

There's a ton of money being made in DVDs and other forms of home video and these amounts are expected to skyrocket. For as long as possible, the Producers want to keep as much of it as possible for themselves.

Believe it or not, there really isn't much more to it than that. What's more, regardless of what they may say in public, everyone involved knows that that's what this is about.

You'll hear and read a lot about recoupment and softness in traditional markets and deficit financing and all sorts of biz-babble and some of it may even be true. But it's by and large irrelevant to the core of the situation, which is that the companies want to maximize profits and the people who run them want to maximize their own personal take-home pay and bonus moola. They don't want to say that even though everyone knows that…so they put up the smoke and mirrors and say, "Gee, we'd love to cut you guys in for a better piece but there are all these complicated business-type reasons why we can't." The folks explaining that do not buy it for one second when it comes time to negotiate their own compensation but, you know, this is how the game is played.

Do not believe there's anything going on here other than the situation I just summarized. Yeah, there are issues about respect and creative controls and minority hiring and screen credits and a number of other things, and I'm not suggesting they don't matter. They matter a lot but they don't matter enough for either side to allow a strike to happen over them.

To underscore that point: As I was typing the above paragraph, I received my copy of tonight's mass e-mailing from WGA Prez Patric Verrone. It says, in part…

After three and a half months of bargaining, the AMPTP still has not responded to a single one of our important proposals. Every issue that matters to writers, including Internet reuse, original writing for new media, DVDs, and jurisdiction, has been ignored. This is completely unacceptable.

It's also completely typical, as you'll see if you read back through some of my past postings on the subject.

This will be my fourth (or is it fifth?) strike since I joined the WGA. In every one, I've lost something…some important project went away, some break broke. On the other hand, I've done okay through them because my income has never been wholly dependent on work that the WGA covers. The real pains have come from the distraction, the emotions, the politics and labor of striking, and the holding of hands (figuratively) of friends who are frightened or hurting. I believe that some of those 4-5 strikes were mismanaged from our side but on the separate question of whether any given strike was warranted, I never felt we had a choice. I don't see that we have one this time.

Music Man

One of the best things about the classic Warner Brothers cartoons is the music. It was almost all the handiwork of a brilliant man named Carl Stalling who died in 1972. Fortunately for history, he was interviewed a few times before he left us…by Mike Barrier, Milt Gray and Bill Spicer. Barrier is sharing some of that material with us over on this page of his website.

Go Read It

Scott Dunbier, who is presently between editing/managerial gigs in the comic book business, tells the story of a freelancer with a great way to deal with the fact that he didn't have his work in. Go read Scott and then come back here to read the rest of this item.

Back so soon? Okay. I recently heard of what was probably even a better excuse. A certain artist did not have his work done. He sent his editor an e-mail and to it he attached a photo of an extremely beautiful model-actress wearing almost no clothing. The message said, "I had the choice between getting your assignment finished and having sex with this woman. What would you have done?"

The editor wrote back, "Congrats. You did it to her and me at the same time."

By the way: Scott quotes what he says is an old saying in the comic book industry about how to get steady work, a writer or artist must have two out of the following three qualities: He (or she) just be very good, very fast or very nice. I often cite that as an "old saying" in the business — I say "very reliable" instead of "very fast" — but I actually don't think it's an old saying. I think I made it up, sort of. There's a sign one often sees in print shops that says you can have Quality, Speed or Value…pick any two. I believe I modified it for the comic book industry. At least, I never heard it anywhere before I started saying it and I'd much rather have the credit for that than for Scrappy Doo.

Today's Video Link

Here's ten minutes of Robert Goulet just being Robert Goulet…

Recommended Reading

Paul Krugman says that we have nothing to fear but fear itself. He isn't the first person to say that but that doesn't mean he isn't right.

Another Public Appeal

In 1967, Zero Mostel appeared in a TV special called Zero Hour. Does anyone have a copy?

Robert Goulet, R.I.P.

I met Robert Goulet a grand total of once. It was backstage after an appearance he made in Las Vegas and he was charming and friendly and able to tread an amazing line of ego, being simultaneously self-deprecating but very proud of the performance he had just finished.

Three things I remember. One is that even though he was getting on in years, you could see that at one point, this man was handsome enough to make you hate him. Secondly, that face lit up when I asked him about Alan Jay Lerner, his old friend and one of the creators of the Broadway play, Camelot, which brought stardom to Goulet and vice-versa. He said that in a perfect world, Lerner would still be alive and writing shows as good as that one (or My Fair Lady) and he [Goulet] would be happy to do nothing in life but star in them. Forget the movies and the TV appearances and the records and the concerts. He just wanted to be in shows as good as the one he did with Lerner and Loewe.

Well, at least that's what he said. I'm not sure I believe him, though I'm sure that at that moment, he believed it.

And the third thing I remember was that he told me a joke I can't repeat here, not because it was dirty but because the punch line was insulting to another performer — one who, if the rumors are true, will be the subject of an obit here before long. The funny thing is that a few years later, I worked with that other performer and he told me the same joke…but the punchline was about Robert Goulet. I'll tell it here after the other guy's gone.

I saw Goulet perform that night in Vegas and I saw him again a few years ago at Carnegie Hall in New York. It was part of a salute to Alan Jay Lerner, and he and Kristin Chenoweth did justice to the man's songs. He was very good that evening. But then he was always good, which is why he had such a long and magnificent career.

WGA Stuff

A source close to the negotiations — not someone on the WGA Board or Negotiating Team but close enough for me to pass it on — tells me a strike may not be inevitable…and that if it does happen, it won't be because the Writers Guild didn't do everything possible to prevent it. (I assume this person means "everything possible short of taking a rotten contract full of rollbacks.")

There is a new WGA proposal — a new package of demands, compromises and even a few concessions — and it will be presented to the Producers tomorrow. My source says it could have been presented tonight — "they could be in there right now, hashing it out or at least studying it" — but the Producers closed down the bargaining session rather than work into the evening. The thinking is that this is their way of saying, "We haven't seen your proposals but we're already inclined to reject them just because they aren't our proposals."

A Federal Mediator was in today, mostly talking to the two sides in separate sessions. The Mediator, I am told, wants to keep the talks going and one possibility is that there will a kind of "cooling-off period." The Producers will agree to keep talking for at least X days and the WGA will agree to not go on strike for at least X days. My source says that whether that has a chance of happening will probably hinge on the Producers' response tomorrow to the new WGA proposal.

Personally, I'm feeling good about this; not that a strike can be averted but that the WGA is playing it smart and doing everything it can to make a mature, sensible deal. I've lived through many of these. I've seen us self-destruct and be divided in purpose and strategy…and while I may be surprised at the General Membership Meeting on Thursday night, I don't get that this is the case this time. I've also seen us painted as the Bad Guys who "shut down the town" and caused all those stagehands to be outta work. (It's always been our fault, not the fault of the Studio Heads making 50 million a year apiece who said we were greedy for wanting a fraction of that.) I don't sense that's happening this time, either. Again, I could be wrong and if there's a long strike, things will change in all corners…

…but if I'm picketing this Friday, it won't be because my side didn't try to make things work.

One other thing. In all the news stories about the strike, you'll see mention of a man named Nicholas Counter. I wrote a little about Mr. Counter back in July in this post. The article to which it links is no longer accessible but it basically said that he has a very hard job and he's good at it. There's a tendency to think of him as The Enemy and to act like mean ol' Nick Counter is too stingy (or maybe too pound-foolish) to just give the Writers what they want and get the business back to business. But really, Mr. Counter is just the spokesguy and behind-the-scenes coordinator for those with the real power to say no. He's only the Bad Guy if he forgets to remind them that they can also say yes, and that "yes" is sometimes less destructive all around.

Today's Video Link

Here's another video you won't watch in full, at least not now. It's an entire episode — fifty-three whole minutes — of Jackie Gleason's American Scene Magazine, which was the variety show Mr. Gleason did for CBS beginning in 1962 and continuing for much of the sixties. They eventually dropped the "magazine" format and in any case, it was usually referred to as The Jackie Gleason Show, anyway.

This episode features Art Carney in a long Honeymooners sketch with Sue Ane Langdon as Alice. There's also Frank Fontaine and The June Taylor Dancers…and he doesn't get billing up front but there's a musical performance in there by an excruciatingly-young Wayne Newton. Also, there's a musical sketch with songs by James Shelton, Mary Rodgers and Martin Charnin, and your announcer is Johnny Olson. It is said that Mr. Gleason would not do a show without the high-energy warm-ups (written about here) of Johnny Olson. This show was done in New York, probably in the studio where Dave Letterman now tapes. But later, when Gleason moved his whole operation to Miami, he'd have Johnny fly down on tape days to do the warm-up and announcing chores.

And awaaaaay we go—!

VIDEO MISSING

Recommended Reading

Avi Klein has a fascinating article about the suicide of Lyndon LaRouche's printer. You all remember LaRouche, who pops up here and there with political goals that are, to say the least, a bit hard to fathom. Well, the guy who's been printing his pamphlets is no more, and it's triggered a rather odd chain of events.

By the way: The upcoming presidential election is the first time in 32 years that LaRouche has not been an active candidate. Given his past performance, it probably won't make any difference in his vote total. And he'll still finish ahead of Alan Keyes.

Monday Evening

Last week, when fires were popping up all over Southern California like Pinkberry Yogurt Shops — and doing almost as much damage — the wonderful folks at FEMA staged a bogus press conference. You may have heard about it. It looked like reporters were asking questions but it was really FEMA staff members asking prearranged questions and…well, it was another embarrassment to an organization that you'd think, by this time, would be darn hard to embarrass.

The director of external affairs of FEMA, John "Pat" Philbin, is now the former director of external affairs for FEMA. In an interview today (a real one, oddly enough), he made the following statement that I felt needed to be stared at for a few minutes…

I did not have good situational awareness of what was happening.

Well, there's part of the problem right there. "Situational awareness?" We have a guy here who doesn't even know how to say, "I didn't know what the hell was going on," let alone figure it out.

Synchronicity

The other day here, I told you about an episode of the old I've Got a Secret game show in which Groucho Marx appeared…and his secret was that he wasn't answering the questions asked by the panel. The panel was blindfolded and the questions were being answered by comedian Dayton Allen impersonating Groucho's voice.

Every few weeks, GSN runs an old I've Got a Secret very early Sunday morning. This A.M., by a strange coincidence, they ran that very episode, the one I was just talking about. It originally aired on 10/28/63, by the way.

That's about all I have to say on the subject. I just thought I ought to mention it and give you a frame grab to prove it. There. Now I can go to bed.

Today's Video Link

Last August, we told you about a place called The Stoogeum…a private museum dedicated to a group of men who used to stick their fingers into each others' eyes. Here's your chance to get a five minute tour…

Correction

I misremembered and I thank all who've written to jog my memory. The bogus hour-long adventure show — the one I mentioned in this post, the one that never existed — wasn't an eighties' spin on Mission: Impossible. That show was produced and did exist. What I was remembering was the claim that a studio had secretly produced an updated version of the old Mr. Lucky TV show with John Vivyan and Ross Martin. That one never existed.

Which raises two interesting questions: Why hasn't someone produced an updated version of the old Mr. Lucky TV show? And why hasn't someone released the old one on DVD?

More WGA Stuff

I just received an e-mail — part of a mass mailing from WGA President Patric Verrone, that says a lot of the same things I said here about a half hour ago. The difference, of course, is that he knows what he's talking about. Patric's a pretty smart guy, by the way, and he seems to have as much trust as any WGA President could possibly ever have from such a contentious group.

Nikki Finke has posted the text of it on her weblog…and if you're interested in what's going on, you might keep an eye on that weblog. But again, don't believe everything you read from any unofficial source, and that includes my weblog.

Basically, Patric says that they're anticipating a lowball, last minute offer that may leave us no alternative but to strike. Well, that's okay. I put off taking my usual daily walk this weekend because I figure I'm going to be getting plenty of exercise. A deep sigh, a shaking of the head and eyes rolling upwards.