Here's the Washington Post fact-checker.
I agree with Jonathan Chait's review of The Debate. And with Eric Levitz on why Biden (probably) won the debate.
And while I would have liked to see Chris Wallace be more forceful in getting Trump to play by the rules, I don't think there was much he could do. And a case could be made that he did his job by letting Trump be Trump. That's who the guy is and the world got to see it. Why is that a bad thing?
Trump apparently thought he scored some points against Biden by repeatedly bringing up Hunter Biden. Now, the fact-checkers are saying Trump was wrong about Hunter B. being "dishonorably discharged" from the military and the claim of a multi-million dollar payoff is, at best, arguable. But even if Trump was right, is that going to move votes? Hunter Biden isn't on the ballot and he isn't on any list of issues that voters care about.
I have the feeling there'll be a lot of uncomfortable questions put to Republican Senators and Congressfolks tomorrow and a lot of evasive non-answers.
And now, I'm going to try to go back to not paying attention to the guy in the White House who, I hope, won't be there much longer.