Your Daily Trump Dump

Today's Bad News for Donald Trump
From New York magazine: "A federal appeals court ruled on Monday morning that President Trump must turn over eight years of personal and corporate tax returns, financial information that he has thus far successfully shielded from the public since he entered political life." Actually, I think that's a tiny bit wrong. The forms were subpoenaed from Mazars USA, Trump's accounting firm and it's they who would turn over the forms, not Trump. As I understand it, Trump's argument is that he is immune from prosecution so he is therefore immune from investigation. The whole matter's destined to wind up at the U.S. Supreme Court whose members will rule however they want to rule. As I look at how bad Supreme Court watchers have been doing the last few years in predicting how votes will go, I wouldn't want to hazard a guess.

Today's Outrage by Donald Trump
From Vox: "The Trump administration on Monday started the official process of pulling the United States out of the Paris climate agreement. The U.S., currently the second-largest emitter of greenhouse gases and responsible for the largest share of historical emissions, is now the only country in the world to back out of the accord." I still don't understand the reason for this except for Trump's insistence that any agreement not negotiated by Donald Trump is a terrible, lousy, bad, stinky deal and that any agreement negotiated by Donald Trump will be a great, wonderful, perfect deal.

Comic-Con News

If you think the Christmas decorations are going up early this year, get this: We're planning now for Comic-Con International in San Diego next July! It's July 23-26 to be exact, with a Preview Night on the 22nd.

Last month, they had Returning Registration where folks who were there last year could compete in the lottery for a certain number of the tickets for the 2020 event. This month — on November 16, there will be Open Registration where anyone who already has a Comic-Con Member ID can vie for another certain number of tickets. Many of them will not succeed because there's a lot more people who want to be in that convention center than the convention center can hold. But if you're going to try, read this page well before 11/16. And if you need more prep, my friends at the The San Diego Comic-Con Unofficial Blog (not affiliated with the con itself) have prepared this page which will tell you more.

Also, if you'd like to know more about the history of the convention, the con has posted some highly informative articles on this website.  These were written for the souvenir book last year and even I, a person who's attended every last one of these kosmic kaffeeklatsches, learned much from them.  If you haven't read Bill Schelly's massive overview of the con's history, which I recommended here before, make sure you do.  It's the first of the links on this page.

Lastly, if you can't wait for Comic-Con (and/or can't get a badge), WonderCon is April 10-12, 2020 at the Anaheim Convention Center.  Run by the same fine con-runners, it's kind of like Comic-Con Lite.  That means that instead of being twenty-five times too big to see and do everything you want to see and do, it's only about ten times too big to see and do everything you want to do.  Some folks prefer it to Comic-Con because it isn't quite as overwhelming.  And some folks prefer it because it's fairly easy to get a badge for it if you act when they first go on sale.

They haven't yet.  I'll try to let you know when that date is announced but you might want to keep an eye on the website, most of which still displays info on the 2019 show.    I think that's everything for now.

Today's Video Link

I occasionally catch the current Family Feud show, which is hosted by Steve Harvey.  This is not the kind of television we put in time capsules and show at the Paley but it's fun and I think Mr. Harvey does as good a job as anyone these days does hosting a game show.  The exhibit below shows you that he's a secure man, willing to let one of the contestants actually be funnier than he is.  Most of them would not have allowed it to go on as long as this one did…

Not-a-Saint Louis

Louis C.K. is now selling tickets for what I guess you'd call a comeback tour.  He'll go from North Carolina to Illinois and then to Iowa and then to Israel, then to Italy, then back to Israel, then to Slovokia, then back here to Michigan and other spots in the U.S.  Some of these concerts are already sold out.

At least for the shows in this country, Yondr cases are a condition of attendance…

This event will be a phone-free experience. Use of cellphones, smart watches, smart accessories, cameras or recording devices will not be permitted in the performance space.

Upon arrival at the venue, all phones and smart watches will be secured in Yondr cases that will be opened at the end of the event. Guests maintain possession of their phones at all times, and can access their phones throughout the show at designated Phone Use Areas in the venue. All phones will be re-secured in Yondr cases before returning to the performance space.

Anyone seen using a cellphone during the performance will be escorted out of the venue. We appreciate your cooperation in creating a phone-free viewing experience.

And that's not the only rule.  According to this piece in the New York Times

…attendees will not be allowed to take notes, even on paper. "Recording of any kind, including note taking," is not permitted, the rules say. And no part of Louis C.K.'s "materials" — a.k.a. his jokes and sketches — are allowed to be "copied, translated, transmitted, displayed, distributed or reproduced verbatim," in any form. Those who violate these rules are subject to legal repercussions, it reads.

So we have two issues here, one being whether this man should be out touring and performing. I say sure. He hasn't been charged or convicted of any crime. He admitted to doing some bad things and I really don't know what the penalty should be for them, nor would I want to sit on a jury deciding that penalty. In the absence of legal proceedings, it becomes a matter of whether theaters want to book him and people want to see him…and I assume if enough people want to see him and there are no mass demonstrations or reprisals — any maybe even if they are — most theaters will be only too happy to book him.

Not all that long ago, I might have been in one of those audiences because I admired his work but even before his sex scandal, I was done with the guy. He became (to me) one of those comics who says shocking, offensive things not because he believes them but because he thinks a reputation for being shocking and offensive is very commercial…and maybe easier than writing smart, perceptive jokes. I'm not against shocking and offensive in a comedian. Jim Jefferies is one of my current favorite comics but unlike what I began hearing from Louis C.K. before his exile, Jefferies is funny and he either means what he says or does it with a kind of verbal wink that lets you know he doesn't.

So if and when Louis C.K. comes my way, I won't be buying tickets for that reason and also because of the Yondr case requirement. I already discussed those things here and came to the conclusion that they'd probably keep me away from most shows. I don't question any performer's right to require them but I don't think I want to attend most shows — maybe any — if that's a condition. Then add in the threat of litigation if I come back here and review the show on my blog and you know what you get? Well, it's not my ticket money.

I always thought of stand-up comedy as the purest form of Free Speech we have in this country. Louis C.K.'s entire career is built on this freedom and here he is trying to restrict it for others. Is he really going to sue reviewers who quote a line or two of what he does on stage? I can understand why he might want to try having it both ways — the money plus jumpstarting his career while making it harder to criticize him. It just seems to me that if you're trying to prevent people from reviewing your act, the way to achieve that is to not go out and do your act.

It reminds me of something and to tell you about it, I have to go back to a post here from 2003. Dennis Miller was on a barely-watched MSNBC show that Phil Donahue was hosting back when no one watched MSNBC. The audience for it may have been just me and Marlo…

At one point on the broadcast, Miller made a reference to having sex with sheep, complete with the "f" word, and then remembering he was on live TV, he turned to Donahue and asked, "We're on a delay, right? They're bleeping me, right?" They weren't, at least insofar as the East Coast was concerned. During the next commercial, someone informed Miller that he'd just said what he'd said on live, non-HBO TV and when they came back from the break, he muttered a slight apology and told his host that it was stupid not to have a tape delay on a show of that sort.

Now, I don't think saying that word on MSNBC is going to matter one bit in the world. It wouldn't even matter if it was uttered on a show that someone besides me was watching. But Dennis Miller was live on Saturday Night Live. Dennis Miller was live on Monday Night Football. Dennis Miller was even live on Dennis Miller Live. The man understands the concept of live television and has usually appeared on it without a tape delay. He has also spent an awful lot of airtime blasting people who don't accept personal responsibility for their actions. But apparently, it's the Donahue show's fault that he was heard saying something he said but didn't mean to have heard.

And it's also the first time I've ever seen a professional comedian complain about not being censored.

If I thought for a while, I might be able to think of another time that a professional comedian wanted to try and limit the Free Speech of others…or at least others who weren't in the audience and heckling him. Right now, only Louis C.K. comes to mind.

A Day in Our Future

I have already decided I'm not leaving my house on Halloween 2020. No matter what parties invite me, no matter how near or far they are to me, no matter who throws them or what temptations there might be to lure me to them, I am not leaving my home on Halloween 2020. Here are some reasons why and I may come up with others…

  1. I don't like to go out on Halloween anyway…
  2. …and next year, Halloween falls on a Saturday so it will be rowdier with more parties and people partying 'til late in the night…
  3. …and it's a Leap Year and they're always a little weird…
  4. …and there will be a full moon that night so there will be real werewolves prowling about…
  5. …and it'll be a night when we set the clocks back so the debauchery and mayhem will last for an extra hour…
  6. …and most frightening of all, it will be only three days until this country votes for President so there will be last-minute rallies and much screaming and yelling and charges and counter-charges and predictions that we will all die if the wrong person is elected and everyone will be crazy anyway.

So plan on joining me and not going anywhere on October 31, 2020. If you need me that day, I'll be under my bed shivering.

Today's Video Link

Here are four toy commercials from the sixties. First up is one for Slinky, which was one of those toys that was just fun to have around to keep your hands busy. In the commercial, which is from around sixty years ago, it says you can buy a Slinky for "under a dollar" — which, as I learned at a very young age means 99 cents and no less. I was curious as to what they sell for today and was impressed to find that you can order a Slinky from Amazon (here's the link) for only $3.39. I can't think of too many things that have gone up so little in price over that time period.

Next is Mr. Machine, an Ideal toy which encouraged you to take it apart and put it back together. Two different friends of mine back in my youth managed the first part, were unable to accomplish the second and had to call me in it show them how it was done. In both cases, I did this by trying something that had apparently not occurred to either of them: Reading and following the instructions. Danny watched me put it back together and thought, "If Mark can do it, I can do it," whereupon he immediately took it apart again…and discovered he couldn't do what Mark had done. That was around 1964 and as far as I know, he's still working on it.

Third, we have a spot with a couple of Hasbro products with a cartoon kid whose voice was done by Mae Questel, best known as the voice of Olive Oyl and Betty Boop. And then we have everyone's favorite plastic pugilists, the Rock 'em, Sock 'em Robots. You can still buy the robots for $18 and I just discovered there's a version of the game where Superman and Batman try to knock each other's block off…

Saturday Evening

Buzzr didn't run the episode of the Match Game-Hollywood Squares Hour that was scheduled today. They reran one they ran last week. So I don't know when they'll be running one that Stan Freberg is on.

I'm not in the mood to look at political news this weekend. The Trump Dumps will be back when I am.

The fine actor Hal Holbrook has retired from performing his famous show as Mark Twain. I am so glad I got to see him do it and I'm looking forward to a new documentary about him and the show he did for a staggering 63 years, needing less and less make-up with each year. Here's an article about that documentary.

Twice Two

You're all familiar with the game shows Match Game and Hollywood Squares, right? Well, in 1983 there was a brief, shining moment when neither of those two shows was on the air in either its original form or one of the umpteen revivals. Someone at NBC decided that America could not be without them a moment longer and brought them back as a combined hour.

A two-game game show, they felt, needed two hosts. They hired Gene Rayburn, who'd hosted the first two incarnations of Match Game but they did not hire Peter Marshall, who'd been the host of the original Hollywood Squares. Reportedly, he was not even approached and I have no idea why. To handle the game he'd launched, they brought in Jon "Bowzer" Bauman, the breakout star of the rock 'n' roll group Sha Na Na.

For the first half of that hour, Rayburn would host Match Game with six celebrities, one of whom would be Bauman. Halfway through, they'd add three more celebrities, slap another tier of seats on the set and Gene and Jon would switch places. They'd then play Hollywood Squares with Mr. Bauman hosting. At the end, Rayburn would take back the host microphone as the winning contestant for the day played the Match Game bonus round for serious bucks.

It must have sounded good in the meetings but it didn't attract a huge audience and ended after — if we are to believe Wikipedia and we shouldn't always — 191 episodes. I have no idea how a Monday-thru-Friday show could have an episode count that wasn't a multiple of five but that's what it says. In any case, there were probably a number of reasons why the combined might of two hugely-powerful game shows didn't run anywhere near as long as either had individually, one being that the shows were too similar so each made the other look unremarkable.

Also, I don't think they always got stars who were up to the challenge of being amusing in quick spurts. The hired a lot of folks who were there not because they were entertaining panelists but because they were on a hit prime time show and some weren't all that funny. Years later in a Twitter post, Jon Bauman wrote, "Understand that this was the only completely honest version of Hwd Squares ever where no Squares were sitting there with the punch lines of the jokes in front of them." Maybe that was part of the problem.

I worked with Bauman on another show soon after — he was a very nice, smart guy by the way — and we got to talking about the MG-HS Hour and why it didn't succeed. He told me about that honesty and also about one slight bit of dishonesty that did sneak in a few times. ..

The way Match Game was played, questions would be asked of the stars and they'd each write down one response, then display it when called upon. In Round 1 of a two-round game, the contestant would try to match all six stars. In Round 2, only the stars who'd gone unmatched in Round 1 would play. According to Jon, there was one recurring panelist who craved the extra screen time that would be his if he played in both rounds…so in Round 1, he'd quickly write down two responses. When called upon to display his answer, he would show one that didn't match the contestant. Ergo, the star got to play in Round 2. Jon said he wouldn't tell me who the star was but I guessed and he said I was right. He would not like it if I told you.

And there may have been other reasons why the show didn't fly. Both game shows in their original forms had developed a family of regular "stars" (as is common, the noun was used hopefully) but the hour amalgam didn't really even try to do that. And it didn't have a great time slot and maybe it was too much of the same thing…

In any case: It went off and for a long time, those episodes weren't rerun anywhere because one company owned Match Game and another company owned Hollywood Squares. They'd forged some sort of partnership alliance to do the original hours but were unable to come to terms for a syndication deal. That finally got solved and now they're rerunning on the Buzzr cable network which features all game shows, all the time.

And here's what prompted me to write about it. Right now, they're running episodes from a week in which one of the panelists was a hero of mine…the great satirist, Stan Freberg! I knew Stan quite well and thought I knew just about everything he'd ever done but I never knew about this.

How he got on this show, I have no idea. Maybe — and this is a reach — it had something to do with the producer, who was Robert Sherman, son of Allan Sherman. Robert and I went to high school together but we've only talked twice in the last fifty years so I may not be able to ask him. But his father, of course, was a great performer of song parodies, most notably "Hello Muddah, Hello Fadduh." People were often getting Allan's repertoire confused with Stan's and telling Stan how much they loved "Hello Muddah, Hello Fadduh."

I believe the first episode with Stan aired last night so you have four more chances to catch one and see him in one of his few game show appearances. If you watch, keep in mind he may not come on until the middle of the show. The other guests in the week include Willie Tyler & Lester, Marcia Wallace, Bruce Baum and Bill Rafferty.

Yesterday's Daily Trump Dump

I posted this last night but I just noticed that a technical glitch ate it…

Today's Bad News for Donald Trump
Well, of course, it's that the House of Representatives voted, albeit pretty much on party lines, to formalize its impeachment inquiry regarding President Donald Trump. It should have been no surprise to anyone but just before the vote, White House adviser Kellyanne Conway said on Fox & Friends, "Impeachment is simple math, you either have the votes or you don't. And guess what — dirty little secret — they don't have the votes." An hour or so later, they had 232 of them. They only needed 218.

You've gotta wonder if Trump or someone around him actually believed they didn't have the votes and told her to say it — and if so, what good did they think that would do? Meanwhile, let's see what Ms. Conway's husband George was saying on Twitter…

It's simply astounding to me how many people continue to be willing to sacrifice their honor and reputation to defend a man who has no redeeming moral virtues, and who is well on his way to well-earned self-destruction.

Hey, pal! That's your wife you're talking about! It's gotta be so much fun at their house.

Today's Outrage by Donald Trump
I don't even know what to say about this

The president reflected on the shooting of House Minority Whip Steve Scalise a few years ago and remarked how tough the Louisiana Republican is — and Trump quipped he wouldn't recommend getting shot as a weight loss plan. Trump also said Scalise's wife "cried her eyes out when I met her at the hospital that fateful day — I mean not many wives would react that way to tragedy, I know mine wouldn't."

Bonus Article About Trump
Hey, I'm linking to an article on the Fox News site! Judge Andrew Napolitano is usually one of those "the government is always wrong" guys, especially when the government is controlled by Democrats. But he thinks the impeachment inquiry hearings to date are perfectly Kosher and done in strict accordance with rules that Republicans voted to accept. He also thinks that the evidence that — well, here. I'll let you read it for yourself…

Congressional Republicans should be careful what they ask for. Their defense of the president has addressed process, not proof. The proof is largely undisputed, except by the president himself. It consists of admissions, testimony and documents, which show that Trump sought to induce the government of Ukraine to become involved in the 2020 presidential election.

I guess we'll be hearing soon that Napolitano is human scum, that he has allegiance to other countries, that he's always been a left-wing looney, etc. Insulting the messenger seems to be the only defense they have against the message.

Halloween Post-Mortem

So I actually went out last night on Halloween — to a party some friends were throwing. The party itself was great, fun, wonderful and delightful in every way. Getting there though was horrendous. On any other night, it would have been forty minutes to get from here to there. Last night, "there" was an hour and forty-five minutes of moving at about the speed of Congress.

On major streets, it was bumper-to-bumper. My four-year-old knee — installed two days after Halloween of 2015 — has a bad time with stop/go/stop/go/stop/go driving but that's what it was like on all the main thoroughfares. When we got to residential streets, I thought I was done with that but it got worse. We were in an area heavily peopled with little people in dark-colored costumes who didn't know you just don't walk across the street without checking to see if my car is coming.

Once we got to the party, things were great and the return home was pretty easy. But the ride there was brutal enough to make me think I won't be going out on Halloween until I can travel via the car George Jetson uses.

Meanwhile, lots and lots of folks who know of my dislike for candy corn sent me jokes about it, almost all of them incorporating my well-known dislike for cole slaw. I got recipes for cole slaw made out of candy corn, candy corn made out of cole slaw, stews made of candy corn and cole slaw, diets in which one consumes only candy corn and cole slaw, etc. Fine. Keep 'em coming. But you should know that I gave up all candy years ago so I really don't have any feelings about the corn variety that I don't also have for Hershey's, Reese's, M&Ms, peppermints, etc. except that I might eat some of them at gunpoint. Candy corn, no.

And to prove I'm not alone in my feelings, here's a video that my buddy Stu Shostak spotted and sent to me. I have no idea who produced this or who the host is or how they conducted their survey or how accurate it is but in this country, we agree with any poll or survey that agrees with us. So here is a thoroughly accurate, indisputable, inarguable, can't-be-wrong sampling of what America believes. Actually, I wouldn't let any of these alleged treats anywhere near any of my mouths…