Your Friday Trump Dump

Our president just did a mini-press conference and barred any news organization that wasn't overtly conservative. Yeah, it's about trying to marginalize the press that doesn't report Trump's every utterance without non-positive comment but it's also because the guy is simply incapable of answering non-fawning questions. Here are some links…

  • So Trump says that "very few people" are covered by Obamacare. Fact checkers everywhere — like here, here and here — are pointing out that this isn't true. His plan seems to be to replace it with something much worse, insist it's better and to call anyone who disputes him a liar.
  • And Sarah Kliff explains what the much-awaited Republican "replace" plan will probably involve. Apparently, those who said it would cost less and be better meant it will be better and cheaper for really rich people.
  • Frank Rich thinks that Trump's rollback of transgender rights is just kind of a warm-up for curtailing the rights of other minorities, particularly their rights to vote.
  • Many of my friends who think Trump is a horrible leader took some comfort when he spoke of repairing America's infrastructure. That, at least, would do some good and create some real jobs. Okay…but Matthew Yglesias says that may not happen because it might get in the way of tax cuts for the rich. In a Republican congress, nothing can get in the way of tax cuts for the rich.

I'm going to take the weekend off from this kind of thing to work on a script. If you want a lot of dumping on Trump, just watch the Oscars.

Conventional Thinking

We are nearing the time when badges will go on sale for this year's Comic-Con International. This means we are also nearing the time when badges will be sold-out for this year's Comic-Con International. The time between the first of these moments and the second might well be less than the time it takes to warm a Hot Pocket in the microwave. In any case, I want to suggest that you not (repeat: NOT) rely on this blog to tell you when the first will occur. You can find out by keeping a careful watch on the Comic-Con website.

And while you're over there, remember that there are still badges available for this year's WonderCon, which occurs in Anaheim from March 31 through April 2. I am a guest and I will be — surprise, surprise — hosting a number of panels there including one on Jack Kirby, an April Fools Day edition of Quick Draw!, and a Cartoon Voices panel. WonderCon is always my second-favorite convention of the year.

Oscar Winner

Dan Castellaneta

Your Obedient Blogger had a very good time last night at a performance of For Piano and Harpo, a new play by Dan Castellaneta. It's about pianist, author and superwit Oscar Levant, who was one of the smartest and most troubled figures in the arts back in the previous century. Dan plays Levant and gives a performance that should make the playwright (i.e., him) very happy. He does not do this alone. He's aided by an amazing cast — Deb Lacusta, Jonathan Stark, J.D. Cullum, Gail Matthius and Phil Proctor, all of whom play at least three different people in Levant's life, often making lightning changes of wardrobe and emotion.

One of Cullum's roles is Harpo Marx, who was a friend of Levant's and who welcomed the pianist into his home for a year…not that Levant gave him much of a choice. The contrast of the two men is stunning: Harpo played crazy. Oscar was crazy. And most of the play is watching Oscar work through his neurotic quirks and depressions in an asylum and in his everyday life.  Cullum was terrific as Harpo and even better as a mute inmate in that asylum.

There are moments that are very funny and then abruptly, they become moments of human suffering and tolerance. Deb Lacusta has some chilling scenes, keeping it frighteningly real as Levant's wife June, who suffers because of the man she married. It is, in a way, the most important role in the play besides Mr. Levant. She plays other women in his life as well…and I kept saying to myself, "Gee, she's a good actor."

But then so is everyone on that stage. Stark is amazing as Jack Paar, George Gershwin, Levant's doctor and several other parts. Matthius portrays a mesmerizing (and at times, very funny) asylum resident, June's sister, Oscar's mother and others. Proctor expertly acts as Harpo's butler, Oscar's father, another asylum dweller and others. You could hear members of the audience gasping at the sheer versatility and the rapid pace…and at the delivery of dialogue clever enough to be in Oscar Levant's life.

Dan wrote a very good play, disappeared into the lead role and surrounded himself with a compelling world, sane when it is least believable and insane when it is most believable. We have director Stefan Novinski to thank for much of that.  I guess you'd call this a rave so — full disclosure — I confess that I know most of these people.

Deb Lacusta and Dan Castellaneta

Following the performance, I played emcee for a 20-minute "talk back," interviewing the actors and the two musicians — David O, who played the piano and Jillian Risigari-Gai, who played the harp. Among those in the audience who participated were two Marx Brothers authorities — Steve Stoliar, who was Groucho's secretary in the last years of that great comedian's life, and Joe Adamson, who wrote one of the best books on the brothers, Groucho, Harpo, Chico and Sometimes Zeppo. We didn't have nearly enough time but I did ask Dan about the future of this play, which closes at the Falcon Theater on March 5. He said there is no future yet to speak of but he's hopeful of other productions.

If you live within commuting distance of Burbank, you might still be able to score some seats and go see it. There are some available. If not, be like Dan — hopeful of other productions, preferably near you. This play is too good to not live on.

Thursday Morning

Busy this afternoon with a script…and tonight, I'm moderating the "talkback" for Dan Castellaneta's play which I wrote about here. Tonight's performance is sold out. In fact, most of them are sold out but they added a few more performances so maybe one of them still has seats left. Go check here.

No Trump Dump today but take a read of Jonathan Chait. He's right. If Trump's taxes came out and he admitted on them that he'd made a couple million making child porn and selling U.S. military secrets to Kim Jong-un, the Republican congress still wouldn't act. They'd probably hold ten more Benghazi hearings just to try and sell the idea that Hillary was the real threat. The only way they'll ever hold Trump accountable is if he becomes such a political liability that he looks like he's going to drag the party down to defeat soon.

A few days ago, the National Weather Service was predicting more than an inch of rain on Sunday so the folks doing the Academy Awards scrambled and began setting up tents to protect all those lovely gowns and rented tuxes. But things change and now they're saying mostly light showers in the morning petering out throughout the day. The tents may still come in handy but they may not be necessary.

We've found on more person — super-dealer Bud Plant — who has been at every single Comic-Con International so that makes five of us. Anyone else?

As you know, a source of constant annoyance to me is the stream of unsolicited phone calls I get, trying to sell me on hiring the caller to do construction work on my home or install solar panels. Lately, I've had a new one. Next week, I turn 65 so I'm hearing from Medicare Supplemental Insurance sellers. Many of them do their best to sound like they're from the actual governmental Medicare office and if I let them get through their whole shpiel, they would sign me up for their product, making me think it's a necessary part of completing my Medicare enrollment. This is even slimier than the contractors who call and try to convince me that we spoke last year and I told them to call back because I'd be ready for a free estimate about now. If Trump will do something to stop these calls, I will stop posting about what a rotten human being and leader he is.

Today's Video Link

Here's a funny bit from Late Night with Seth Meyers.  Thanks to Shelly Goldstein for calling it to my attention…

More Lying

My pal Paul Harris notes that the opening titles of Stephen Colbert's show now say it's "live on tape." As Paul notes, it's impossible for a show to be "live" if it's been recorded for broadcast later. And it's not "on tape," either. It's a digital recording.

But I'd like to point out that it's even worse than that. If "live on tape" means anything, it means that the show is recorded in real time with no edits. Colbert's show is edited all the time. The cold opening comedy piece is always pre-recorded. If Colbert ventures out on the street, as he did last week with Robert DeNiro, we see him exiting the main part of the theater and then they cut to an exterior segment that was recorded earlier. And sometimes, they just plain edit an interview that ran long or got boring.

When he has done shows "live" (for real), they sometimes pre-record most of the show earlier, then do live segments at the proper time. They've been known to even bring in two audiences, one for the non-live portions done earlier.

I would love to see a show like that done live — or at least recorded in one non-stop effort with no edits. Alas, late night TV prizes polish over spontaneity. Once upon a time, it was the other way around and that was one of the big things that separated late night from prime time.

Also, the other day, I caught an interview with James Corden, who was talking about his experiences hosting the Grammy Awards. He mentioned that his late night program ran new shows Monday through Thursday, then aired a rerun on Friday. This is not so. His show goes on in most time zones after Midnight…so he has new shows that air Tuesday through Friday and a rerun that runs Saturday morning. And I really can't bring myself to watch Jimmy Kimmel's show but do they still call it Jimmy Kimmel Live? It's recorded earlier, too.

Good News!

Paul Ryan, who's always seemed to have no mission in life other than to see that wealthy folks get more out of government and pay less for it, claims in a Tweet that…

Freedom is the ability to buy what you want to fit what you need. Obamacare is Washington telling you what to buy regardless of your needs.

So I guess he's going to push for a health plan that will make it possible for everyone, including those who can't afford to pay and/or have pre-existing conditions, to obtain the kind of health insurance they think is right for them. That's terrific! I mean, he must understand that not being able to get health insurance or going bankrupt due to medical bills is certainly not freedom, right?

It's Not Spaghetti…

When last I posted my Friends-Lost-Because-of-Trump Counter, we were up to seven. Two of them have since apologized and patched things up but recently, another acquaintance got furious with me for that Tweet I tweeted when it was announced that Michael Flynn had resigned.  To save you the trouble of scrolling down, here it is again…

Hope there's video somewhere of Trump telling Michael Flynn, "You're fired!"

This brought me a vituperative e-mail laced with personal invective from someone who I guess never liked me as much as I liked him. Essentially, he called me a scumbag liar (he used nastier language) for saying that Flynn was fired when in fact he quit because Donald Trump is loyal to his people and would never in a million years actually fire someone. Sure, he'd do it on a "Reality" Show but never ever in real life.

I was accused of spreading "fake news," which is the new term folks use for any news story they don't like, even if it's true. By the time I read this crazed message, Trump's official spokesguy Sean Spicer had already said

The evolving and eroding level of trust as a result of this situation and a series of other questionable instances is what led the President to ask for General Flynn's resignation.

I sent that link to the guy who shot back a new round of insults and the claim that it proved I was wrong because asking for someone's resignation is not the same thing as firing him. Maybe in a microscopic sense he's right but it's kind of like the scene in The Odd Couple where Oscar demands that Felix remove a plate of spaghetti from the poker table and Felix laughs disdainfully and says, "It's not spaghetti! It's linguini!"

Well, now it's garbage.

Looks to me like something ain't working for the Trump people, which was this idea that if they stay on message — insisting that every single thing he does is a huge, smashing success and every report to the contrary is a lie — they could get enough of the country to buy it. It's the old trick we've discussed before of thinking that never admitting you're wrong is the same thing as always being right. There's always a point where that stops working.

Despite the loss of a "net" six friends who back Trump, I still have quite a few. The dividing line between the two groups seem to be that the ones I've kept believe that he's preferable to the alternative and/or he'll change things in this country that they think he should be changed…but they aren't willing to believe all the bullshit. They don't believe he got the largest electoral landslide in history and that he really won the popular vote…or would have if those millions of phantom illegals hadn't voted.

They don't even think he's a good human being who knows what his administration is doing. They just think they'll like most of what he does. I can kinda respect that even if I think they're wrong about what should happen…and maybe even whether Trump will do what they want. I think I can stay friends with these people just so long as they don't tell me I'm horribly wrong if I confuse spaghetti with linguini.

Today on Stu's Show!

Today on Stu's Show, Stu Shostak plays host to voice actor extraordinaire Billy West, who's best known for his work on Ren & Stimpy, Futurama, Doug and dozens of others. He's also in lots of commercials, like he's the red M&M and the voice of the Honey Nut Cheerios Bee and he's been Bugs Bunny and Woody Woodpecker and Elmer Fudd and…oh, he's just a brilliantly clever performer. He will doubtlessly do his legendary Larry Fine impression and it'll be so good that Stu won't be able to resist poking him in the eyes and breaking plates over his head. Don't miss this one, people!

Stu's Show can be heard live (almost) every Wednesday at the Stu's Show website and you can listen for free there and then. Webcasts start at 4 PM Pacific Time, 7 PM Eastern and other times in other climes. They run a minimum of two hours and sometimes go to three or beyond. Then shortly after a show concludes, it's available for downloading from the Archives on that site. Downloads are a bargain 99 cents each and you can get four for the price of three. Even if the shows weren't really good, that's the kind of bargain you can't pass up!

Today's Video Links

A few nights ago, the New York branch of the Writers Guild gave out awards at the Edison Ballroom back there. It was hosted by Lewis Black and I suppose I should warn you that the following clips contain naughty words, humor in questionable taste and many unflattering remarks about the current occupant of the White House. First, here's Mr. Black's opening monologue…

And now, here's an award presented by Triumph the Insult Comic Dog…

Recommended Reading

Here's a real good piece by Matt Taibbi on Milo Yiannopoulos and the premise that Free Speech is endangered whenever someone doesn't give such a person a forum — and usually, a nice speaker's fee. And make sure you read all the way through to the end because the last half-dozen paragraphs are pretty important.

ASK me: Casting Voices for CGI Cartoons

An up-and-coming cartoon voice actor sent me this question and asked that I leave his name out of it…

I was in the audience at one of your Cartoon Voices panels in San Diego, wishing I was established enough to be up there on the stage with the pros. I heard you make a remark that intrigued me and I was wondering if you could elaborate.

I have watched as the industry has transitioned from hand-drawn animation to computer animation and I never imagined that would affect the voice actors. After all, a voice role is a voice role, right? But I heard you say offhandedly that casting voice actors for CGI shows is different from casting them for hand-drawn shows and I can't imagine how. Can you tell me how?

Well, it may seem like a small thing but it does matter. My job in casting is to do the show right with as few actors as we need to pay to come in. As is allowed by the Screen Actors Guild contract, many of those actors will do two or three parts.  Some of the actors in the session will be regulars — folks who voice characters who are in every episode. They may double or triple and do "incidentals" (characters unique to each episode) but I will probably also need a few guest actors to do all the incidentals.

Let's say in a scene for one cartoon, I as the writer want to have a two policemen walk in and each say two lines and exit. Piece o' cake. I describe the policemen I want the artists to draw and they draw them. I as the voice director assign the roles to two of the actors in my session. Simple.  At least, that's how it was in a hand-drawn show.  It was very cheap to bring in a new character so there were a lot of them.

But with CGI animation, every character is a computer model that has to be designed from every possible angle. We need to design them from the back even if you only see them from the front. Someone builds a fully functional computer model and that costs a heap of money. So instead of spending the dough to design two policemen, I have one do it. Right there, there's less for actors to do and if I think small that way throughout, I might need one or two less actors in the session.

Plus, there's this: If you watch a CGI show, you'll notice that if a policeman walks into a scene in one episode, it's usually the same policeman who walked into the last episode. If there's a TV newswoman, it's usually the same TV newswoman. If you look carefully at most crowd scenes, you may notice a lot of "extras" who were major characters in other episodes because each different figure is expensive.

So CGI shows generally have fewer characters per episode…ergo, fewer voice jobs.  And the jobs you do have are usually spread around among fewer actors.

Let's say in Show #1, I have that policeman and since guest actor Victor Voiceover is in that episode playing a big role, I have him also do the two lines as the policeman. Then two shows later, I write an episode about a race of Worm People. The big guest role is that of their leader but one scene calls for a policeman to walk in and say a few lines. On a hand-drawn show, it would probably be a different policeman so it wouldn't matter who did his voice and I could hire any actor.

But in the CGI show, it's going to be the same policeman and often the producers want to keep the voices on repeat characters consistent…so I hire Victor to do guest voices on that episode so he can do the policeman's lines. And of course, since he's there and we're paying him, I think, "Hey, Vic would be great as The Leader of the Worm People" so I assign him that role and he also does the three lines as a pizza delivery guy. And then the week after, since we spent all that cash designing Worm People, I bring them back again, which means I bring Victor back again.

And then a few shows later, I build the main storyline about that pizza delivery guy since we spent so much money making his computer model…and that means we bring Victor back yet again.  Over the course of thirteen episodes, I might need to book Victor eight times to do guest voices.  In a hand-drawn show, I might have had twice as many guest roles and spread them around among a greater number of actors.

There's nothing really different about what the actors do in a CGI show as compared to a cartoon drawn by hand. There's just fewer characters, which means fewer jobs, and a tendency to hire the same folks over and over for guest roles.

ASK me

Your Tuesday Trump Dump

At the San Diego Comic Fest, I got into a brief (thankfully, brief) political discussion with an old friend of mine.  I can remember when, not that long ago, this fellow thought that the tales of Bill Clinton philandering were (a) all unquestionably true and (b) solid proof that the man was unfit to hold public office.  He still thinks that but he's fine with Donald Trump.  The tales of him abusing women, despite his recorded bragging about it, are unproven and surely way exaggerated and should not be mentioned, lest they tar a good Man of God who's going to do great things for this country.

That's one of the things that's so maddening about what's going on.  It's not even a matter of Party over Principle.  It's the realization that with some people, there's no Principle at all apart from "our side winning."  Here are some links…

  • Trump is sure having a hard time sounding convincing when he says Anti-Semitism is a bad thing.  It's like he's thinking, "How can I officially come out against it without losing the support of people who hate Jews?"
  • Our reality-show prez has been promising to bring back jobs for coal miners.  I respect the grand and dedicated tradition of that profession but I think it's a lot like being a Betamax repairman these days. The best thing that could be done for the miners might be some kind of retraining and placement program.  Here's Brad Plumer on what Trump can and cannot do for them…and the "can" does not include bringing back that industry the way they want.
  • Joe Conason on why that Russian Dossier on Trump can't be ignored.  Something in there really smells and it isn't the part about the alleged Moscow hookers.
  • Daniel Larison writes about "American Exceptionalism" and the flawed premise that you must not think America is a very great thing if you're against us getting into a lot of wars.  What's scary is that a lot of people who believe that are the people Trump is playing to.

I do these on the similarly-flawed premise that if I do all my reading and writing about Trump in the morning, I can pay little or no attention to him the rest of the day.  It hasn't worked yet but still, in the immortal words of Elmer Fudd, "I twy and I twy…"

Streaking

The first Comic-Con International was held under a different name in San Diego from August 1–3 in 1970.  That is darn close — and getting closer with each passing day — to half a century. The four people above were each present for at least one day of that convention.

The gentleman at left is Gene Henderson.  Next to him is Jackie Estrada.  Gene and Jackie have both been of great service to the convention over the years, working on various aspects of it.  In the back are, also reading from left to right, illustrator Bill Stout and me.  We believe we four are the only people who have been there for at least one day of every one of those forty-eight conventions…but before we say that too loudly, we want to ask around a bit and make sure.

Is there anyone else?  Anyone who has shown up on at least one day of every single Comic-Con International, including the years when it was called the Golden State Comic-Con, San Diego's West Coast Comic Convention or the San Diego Comic-Con?  (It became Comic-Con International as of 1995.)  If there is, we'd sure like to know.  Drop me a note if you are one or know of one.

Today's Video Link

The Oscars are coming up. We would like it if even one of the acceptance speeches sounded anything like this one by Rowan Atkinson…