So they're saying Bill Cosby may "walk" because of a technicality in the case against him in Pennsylvania. A former district attorney there says he agreed that what Cosby said in the deposition in the civil case against him wouldn't be used in any criminal case against him. And without that deposition, the current criminal case against Cosby becomes a lot weaker.
I don't know about the merits of this argument and I assume that however the judge rules, someone will think it's a miscarriage of justice and maybe grounds for appeal. What I do know is that if this is the thing that gets Cosby his freedom, it won't clear his name in any way. It'll just mean that they had good evidence against him and weren't allowed to apply it. The end result will be that in the court of public opinion, he gets away with rape because he could afford good lawyers. It may save him prison time but it won't help his reputation. Or anyone's views of how our court system operates.