Yearly Archives: 2015

Here's Amanda Marcotte with one of the best pieces I've read about how the term "religious freedom" in this country is coming to denote some sort of right to force your religion on others.

• Indiana to "clarify" that law designed to permit discrimination against gays does not really permit discrimination against gays.

Here we have an interview with one of my favorite actors, William Daniels. I am most interested in his remembrances of the musical 1776, which I regard as one of the ten-or-so (maybe five-or-so) best musicals ever written. And it's amazing that I feel that way because I don't feel most of the songs in it are very good yet I still think the show's terrific.

The article can't cover all that Daniels has done and one of the things it doesn't mention is his role on The Nancy Walker Show, a 1976 situation comedy that lasted 13 weeks and then disappeared forever. It was one of the first jobs for the then-new writing team of Mark Evanier and Dennis Palumbo and we disappeared before the series did, along with the producer who'd hired us and other folks involved in what was not a happy experience for anyone, viewers included.

Dennis and I figured out the problem early, which is not to say we were in a position to solve it. Nancy Walker was popular because of her role as Rhoda Morganstern's mother and she probably should have stayed with that character and done a spin-off on CBS. ABC offered more money and the chance to star in a series with her name in the title so she took that offer.

It still might have worked if they'd teamed her up with a simpatico producer but at the time, ABC owed Norman Lear a series and someone erred by giving him The Nancy Walker Show. Nancy wanted to do a show with physical comedy and a fast pace and zany characters — something more like Laverne & Shirley, whereas Mr. Lear was then interested in issues and current affairs.

He didn't want to do the kind of show she wanted to do and she didn't want to do the kind of show he wanted to do. So they compromised and did a series that neither of them wanted to do. If you saw it — and the odds are you didn't — you probably sensed that no one really knew what the show was about. We were in the writing room and no one in there did.

I mention this because William Daniels played her husband. I never met him but he was enormously professional and no matter how weak his lines were, he always managed to find something funny (or at least, interesting) to do with them. That was quite an accomplishment because, as one of the producers told us, Mr. Daniels hated the show he was in. The showrunners — the series had two and they were running in opposite directions — couldn't please him because they were spending all their time trying unsuccessfully to please Nancy.

It was all quite the mess but Daniels managed somehow to look good in it…or at least to not be noticed, which is often preferable. He really is one of our great actors.

Our pal Floyd Norman thinks Disney ought to finally release Song of the South on home video and in other venues. Floyd is right.

At the same time, I wish people advocating for its resurrection would not spin this as censorship or some kind of Orwellian control. This Disney organization does own the movie and they have the right to decide — as I presume they have — that the film has a low potential for profits and a high potential for grief and outrage. To get them to let it out of the Disney Vault, they have to be convinced it will gross more and be protested less. Floyd's essay is the kind of thing that could help achieve the latter.

Roger Slifer passed away this morning. Roger was another good person I knew in Indiana, though I doubt he was even aware of the current controversy.

He was born (in 1954) and died in Morristown, Indiana. He loved comic books and in the late sixties and early seventies, contributed to amateur publications. This led to professional publications in the mid-seventies, writing for Marvel comics and later moving into editorial work there. As far as I could tell, he was unanimously liked and respected. In the eighties, he moved over to DC, working in both the editorial and sales divisions. He didn't have as much time to write as he would have liked but did manage to co-create and script the popular comic, Lobo.

Roger was a tireless advocate for creators' rights and it was squabbles on that topic that eventually drove him away from the New York comic book industry. He relocated in Los Angeles where he began writing animation and becoming a producer of many shows including G.I. Joe, Transformers, Jem and the Holograms and Bucky O'Hare.

Now, here's where the story gets real sad…

On June 23, 2012, Roger was walking near his home in Santa Monica when he was struck by a hit-and-run driver. Roger suffered several broken bones but the tragic injury was to his head. He spent months in a coma and when he did finally emerge from it, he was unable to speak and only barely aware of his surroundings. He spent more than a year in hospitals and nursing homes in L.A. before his sister Connie, who cared so well for him, moved him back to care facilities in Indiana.

He is said to have been making slow progress and was able to nod and utter a few words in recent months. This morning, he was having trouble breathing and an ambulance was called…but he died before reaching the hospital.

It's so horrible what happened to Roger. It's horrible when that kind of thing happens to anyone but it seems especially wrong that it happened to someone as good as Roger Slifer. He was a man of talent and integrity. The world could use a lot more like him.

I feel bad in one way about all this dumping on Indiana. I've been to the state many times, mainly to Indianapolis and Muncie, and I have quite a few good friends there. Then again, they are all decent, smart folks and I'm pretty sure they're all outraged and embarrassed by this so-called "Religious Freedom Restoration Act." One even wrote me, "I'm sorry our governor likes to pander to the worst and richest people in our state."

You know, at a time when more and more Americans identify with no particular religion, I have to wonder if this controversy will hasten that decline further. During the scandal about the Catholic church protecting pedophile priests, a lot of people decided that religion — and not just Catholicism — was a racket unconcerned with true morality or the fundamental teachings that are preached. The religious leaders who clearly seem to be in it for the bucks also drive people away. Seeing religion used as the justification for discrimination ought to make a few more think it's not for them.

Anyway, I don't want to write a whole lot more about this but a few people wrote me to "agree" with me that the Indiana law was the exact same thing Barack Obama had signed, the same thing Bill Clinton had signed, etc. Actually, I said it was "like" these other laws which, of course, those men no longer support. Here's Garrett Epps to explain why it's not the exact same law.

Trevor Noah will be the new host of The Daily Show. Yeah, I don't know, either.

I agree with this video by John Oliver. I almost never find pranks funny and usually think the prankster is being an enormous a-hole. Once in a while there's a practical joke that actually has a joke in it which is enjoyed by its target. But most of what passes these days for a prank — especially on TV or YouTube — is just nastiness being given a more innocent label. There's something wrong with the party committing the nastiness and with also with those who laugh at it.

I am not suggesting abolishing or even ignoring April Fool's Day. It's a good time to do something clever or silly (preferably, both) to amuse others. I just don't find the discomfort or pain or humiliation of others amusing.

Tim Cook, the CEO of Apple, has something to say about laws that permit discrimination. It's what a lot of us think.

Jonathan Chait offers an interesting theory: Conservatives hate the impending deal with Iran because they reflexively hate every single deal of this sort made by any American president, even the sainted Reagan. Wonder if they'd concede that point or offer up some counter-example.

Of all the pieces I've read online about Indiana's Religious Freedom Restoration Act, this one by Steve Sanders struck me as the most thoughtful. This is not to say I agree with it completely but…well, give it a read.

I never met the man but I have to write something about the passing of someone who directed some of my favorite plays and movies.

Gene Saks was also a pretty good actor. Obits like this one mention that he won acclaim for his role — on the stage and later in the movie — of Chuckles in Herb Gardner's A Thousand Clowns. He was great in the film but folks may not know this…

When that movie was being made, Saks was off on directing gigs and unavailable, so another actor — one who I believe had played Chuckles in the road company of the play — was hired and they filmed with him. The movie didn't turn out so well and there was talk of not releasing it…but Gardner, who'd written it but not directed, convinced the money guys to let him tinker with it. He worked with the editors to recut it and he went out and shot some new footage to drop in…and the change he made convinced the studio that he was improving the movie considerably.

At one point, they said to him something like, "How can we help you improve it even more?" And he said something like, "Gene Saks is available now. Give me the money to go back and reshoot all the Chuckles scenes with him!" They did and the other actor's performance was discarded. Saks was great in the picture.

His main fame, of course, came from directing movies like The Odd Couple and Barefoot in the Park, and plays like Brighton Beach Memoirs and California Suite. He even directed some great things that weren't written by Neil Simon. Thank you, Mr. Saks, for all of them.

Just saw the clip of Indiana Governor Mike Pence on with George Stephanopoulos this morning. Pence was arguing that people are misunderstanding his state's new "Religious Freedom Restoration Act" while at the same time refusing to answer the simplest questions about what it means. Pence actually has a good point when he insists, as he did over and over, that laws like this are all over the country and have even been endorsed or signed by folks who now champion Gay Rights. He has a bad point if he's suggesting they all still support them.

Mostly though, Pence proved the Act is indefensible. At one point, he switched over to insisting that Hoosiers are good, good people who would never discriminate. That makes sense like insisting they're good, good people who would never do anything dishonest so the state doesn't need a law against robbing banks or committing murders.

I don't think any of these laws are ever going to reverse the march to full Marriage Equality and other equal rights for L.G.B.T. folks. They'll slow that march here and there and possibly delude a few homophobes into thinking the tide is turning and they can stuff everyone back in the closet. But equal rights are inevitable and I suspect Governor Pence knows that and is just playing to his base. A lot of them were probably thrilled that he wouldn't play the "game" of defending a position with logic and facts against one of them Commie reporters.

A number of articles in the last week about Ted Cruz have made this point: That his positions aren't particularly different from most of his opponents for the G.O.P. nomination. So what he's doing, they say, is trying to define himself as the guy who'll be utterly ruthless in pursuit of that agenda; who won't care if Democrats and Liberals hate him and who will perhaps even be proud of that. Watching Pence today, I sure got the feeling that he's trying to steal a move from the Ted Cruz Playbook.

Did the story of Germanwings Flight 9525 spook you about your future air travel? It shouldn't have and my pal Joe Brancatelli — who flies about as often as I go to a Ralphs Market, tells you why.

From 1953 to 1961, the revered journalist Edward R. Murrow hosted a TV show called Person to Person. The premise was simple: They'd send a camera crew to some celebrity's home and Murrow, seated in the studio, would interview the celebrity and get a brief tour of the house. Here from April 9, 1954 is a visit to the home of Groucho Marx…