Kirby the Cut-Up

From time to time in the sixties and seventies, Jack Kirby experimented with collage work in his comics and also constructed a number strictly for his own satisfaction. They never worked in comics as well as he wanted, mainly due to the inferior printing techniques. But he still loved the form and Steven Brower has authored an excellent overview of them.

Groucho in Concert

Dick Cavett writes about the night of May 6, 1972 when Groucho Marx appeared at Carnegie Hall in New York.  Most of the article is excerpted from the columnist's book, Eye on Cavett, a fine volume that is long outta-print but worth tracking down.

After the concert, a two-record set was issued called An Evening With Groucho which purports to be the audio from that performance.  I am told it is only partially from the Carnegie Hall show and that a lot of the material on the album, perhaps the majority, was taken from a "warm-up" performance that Groucho gave at Iowa State University before taking the show to New York. The player below will allow you to listen to the record in its entirety. There are arrow controls there that will allow you to skip ahead or backwards and you may want to know that the first cut is an overture played by a then-unknown pianist named Marvin Hamlisch, the second cut is Dick Cavett introducing Groucho and the third cut is Groucho's entrance plus a song in which he is joined by Erin Fleming. After that, the cuts are anecdotes and the occasional song…

Frankly, on the record, he doesn't sound as bad to me as Cavett's article makes him out to be. Perhaps this is evidence that much of what we hear on it is from Iowa. Or maybe I feel that way because I attended Groucho's subsequent Los Angeles concert on December 11, 1972 where he really was in such bad shape he shouldn't have gone on. Compared to what we heard that night, the record sounds pretty decent for a man of his age. I wrote about it in this article…and if you go read that piece, don't stop there. Click the link at the bottom of the page and go on to the second part.

Groucho gave one other concert — after New York but before Los Angeles. It was on August 11, 1972 at the Masonic Auditorium in San Francisco and it was apparently the best of the four. Two weeks after, he suffered a stroke which explains why the L.A. engagement was so painful.

As far as I know, the only record of the San Francisco appearance is a partial audio recording that has a few bad internal edits and a number of defects. Still, the clear portions sound pretty good. You can listen to about a half-hour from the show on a player over on this site. (And can you believe the prices in the above ad? $6.50 for the best seat to see Groucho Marx? Even for '72, that was darn near nothing.)

Go See It!

Hey, let's look at some ways you can be deceived at the supermarket!

Recommended Reading

As Kevin Drum notes, there are those in this country who want manned (meaning, we risk human lives) space exploration to continue. This is usually framed as wanting U.S. space efforts to continue but they're not quite the same thing. We can conquer and learn more about space without running the risk of people getting killed. It just isn't as cool that way.

Premiere in Pasadena

Mike "The Situation" Sorrentino and Stan Lee at the premiere

There's a nice little documentary With Great Power: The Stan Lee Story and it had its theatrical premiere last night at the iPics Theaters in Pasadena, where I believe it is henceforth playing for a while. That looks like a great place to catch a film, by the way: Wide, reclining chairs…a little button with which you can summon someone to bring you food or beverage, etc. I'm almost afraid to see a movie in a place like that for fear I'll want to move in.

Since I'm in this film, I was invited and at first, I wasn't going to attend. I've seen the movie and whatever else I think of it is eclipsed by my utter dislike for seeing myself on the screen — especially in too-close close-ups (I don't even like most people to be that near me, let alone any cameras) and before I lost a lot of weight.

Well, I should say more about it than that: It's a good introduction to Stan — one that captures his current existence and a lot of his past quite well. Now, you have to consider that in this context: It's a film done with Stan's participation and approval. It is not an unbiased exposé of his life, dredging up scandals or things he would prefer to kick under the carpet. That's not to fault it in any way and its makers — Terry Douglas, Nikki Frakes and Will Hess — made exactly the film they set out to make and they made it well. Stan comes across quite charming and deserving in it, though he is often upstaged by his delightful wife Joan.

So if it meant just going to see the film again, I wasn't going to go. But I was also curious about the event and had to be out that way anyhow for something else. As it turned out, seeing the movie was the least of my worries. Few there seemed to want to leave the big party and go off into one of the screening rooms at the complex to catch the film. I guess they all figured they could do that another time. Why miss any of the grand soiree?

When I checked in, a nice lady handed me my pass and directed me to a line. "They want you to walk the red carpet," she said. The red carpet was a gantlet of photographers and media, poised to capture photos and video of attendees, mostly with Stan who was out there, shaking hands, hugging and delivering sound bites to eager microphones. Behind it all, of course, was one of those walls imprinted with the name of the product and in this case, the names of many sponsors and companies doing business with Stan's enterprises.

I asked the nice lady, "Do I have to walk the red carpet? I mean, will they throw me out if I don't walk the red carpet?"

She said, "Well, no…but you are supposed to walk the red carpet."

Abdicating all personal responsibility as I so often do, I walked around the red carpet and stood behind the camerafolks so I could see what was transpiring on the red carpet. It was mostly Stan shaking hands and hugging people and making self-effacing remarks.

I have a lengthy list of conflicting feelings about Stan…about things he's done and perhaps more significantly, things he hasn't done. We've talked about some of this and he understands, and I think it's to his credit that when folks do documentaries about him, like this one and the one on The Biography Channel, he asks that I be included, mainly to make sure someone talks about Jack Kirby. Needless to say, any film that focuses on Stan is not going to spend enough time on Jack, but after declining a few of these, I decided a while back to start saying yes. I can't control the final cut but I can see that those who do have footage that mentions Jack and others who created Marvel Comics. I can also sometimes correct simple factual errors.

I also have a personal affection for Stan — one that flows both from reading his comics and from working with and for the man. I think it's hard not to have a personal affection for the guy — or at least, this guy. Perhaps you have someone in your life who's like that: You can't help liking them even though they've done some things you really, really didn't like. It is still a joy to me to see Stan, especially at his age, getting all the attention and celebrity and cash he so obviously craved all his life. What I was watching on that red carpet, and it was worth the drive to Pasadena and the six bucks I paid to park, was a person about as happy as any person could be.

Having skirted the red carpet, observed Stan on it and realized I needed a Men's Room, I finally went to enter the theater. A man at the door looked at my pass — which I guess had some sort of code on it to indicate I was a V.I.P. — and asked me in an almost scolding tone, "Did you walk the red carpet?" It was the way you'd talk to a child who hadn't done his homework. I told him, "No, I have a note from my doctor that says I'm expressly forbidden from walking any red carpets for two weeks." He laughed and let me in.

I stumbled off into a huge party which like all huge parties in show business was way too noisy to permit anyone quieter than Chris Matthews to carry on a conversation. I was amazed not just at how many people were there but at how few of them I knew. They were mostly, I suppose, connected to Stan's current business endeavors which have very little to do with the comic books that I care about. Stan aside, I may have been the only person on the premises who ever got a paycheck from Marvel Comics, at least for working on a Marvel Comic.

A server offered me a "Marveltini Excelsior" and I wasn't sure if it was a drink or a pile of wood shavings. It turned out to be a drink — a special concoction mixed by, the man said, the gent who prepares cocktails for the Academy Awards. Since alcohol has never passed my lips, I declined but when I got home, I checked an e-mail I'd been sent about the event and sure enough, there was the recipe for the beverage in question…

If you try one, let me know how it is. And you might try facing front and hanging loose when you drink it.

Stan and I spoke briefly but he was busy working the room, posing for photos and having the time of his life. I chatted, to the extent one could chat in that place, with a few folks I knew…but I felt very disconnected from it all as evidenced by the fact that I was there about 90 minutes and sent eight tweets in the last hour. Several of those I talked to said, "I didn't see you on the red carpet," as if I'd snuck in via some illicit entryway.

One introduced me to a reporter who was looking for quotes about Stan. The reporter stuck a voice recorder up near my mouth and asked me what I thought of the new comic book featuring Mike "The Situation" Sorrentino, who was apparently right behind me at that moment. Give me some credit for not being able to recognize the man.

New comic book? I gave the reporter a resounding "Huh?" and he said, "You're probably looking forward to the first issue. That is, in the unlikely event you can get one."

I said, "Well then I'll just have to get the second issue. That is, in the unlikely event that there is one."

He said, "So why are you here?"

I said, "Well, they asked to be here because I'm in the film…"

He said, "The Avengers? God, it's the hottest film out there. What part did you play?"

I started to explain I was Scarlett Johansson's body double but instead I told him, "No, this film. The one about Stan Lee. The one this party's about."

He said, "You're in it? We didn't see you out on the red carpet. So what do you do?"

For some reason when people ask me that, I usually answer, "I write comic books" even though such jobs account for less than 5% of my income and have for several decades. I guess I say it because in my town, there are shoe salesmen who if you ask them what they do, they reply, "I write TV shows and movies," and then may or may not mention they sell New Balance footgear on the side. Rather than sound like one of them, I opt to say I write comic books and I said that to this fellow. He looked puzzled and his face said, even if his voice didn't, "So then what are you doing here?"

By that point, the volume and my constant awareness of pending deadlines had gotten to me so I decided to go home and write a comic book. On my way out of the theater, the news crews outside had just finished stowing their gear so I walked the red carpet but in the opposite direction. You know, it's kind of nice on there if you get rid of all those cameras and microphones.

Lolly, Lolly, Lolly…

A lot of folks consider the A.P. Stylebook as an important decider in what is and is not good grammar. Hopefully, their newest decision won't upset too many purists.

My Tweets from Yesterday

  • At the premiere of the big Stan Lee documentary. I was just offered a special martini "created and formulated to honor Stan's spirit." 19:53:05
  • At the premiere of the Stan Lee Doc. Of approx 500 people at this party, I seem to be the only one who knew him in a previous century. 20:04:36
  • Hanging by the bar. I could go in and watch the documentary but I don't think I could take seeing my head large enough to fill that screen. 20:10:29
  • I just told Stan, "There are more important people at this party but I'm the only M.M.M.S. member!" I think he liked that. 20:28:16
  • Someone just asked me if Stan created Batman. I told him, "No, but he will!" 20:32:46
  • Apart from the fact that I can't make out 90% of what people are saying to me, this is not a bad party. 20:35:49
  • Just remembered how many deadlines I have. Think I'll go home and, believe it or not, write a comic book. 20:43:39
  • Just paid six bucks for parking. Stan doesn't validate. 20:47:57

Today's Video Link

I have friends who spend their lives doing this…

P.S. Thanks to Dawna Kaufmann for the link.

More About Dick Clark

This article lists five ways in which Dick Clark revolutionized the TV business. It does not include "Paying Mark Evanier low money."

Incidentally, a lot of pieces that have appeared about Dick in the last 24 hours have said or implied that his production company was responsible for The $10,000 Pyramid and its successors, the The $25,000 Pyramid and The $100,000 Pyramid and so on. I don't think so. I believe those were all done by Bob Stewart's company and Dick was just a hired hand on them, albeit (I'm sure) a well-compensated hand. He was a very good host for that show and it's interesting that they selected him since when it first went on, it was taped in New York and Dick was living in Los Angeles. He commuted to Manhattan and as I recall, it was something like this: He'd fly into N.Y. Friday night, stay over, tape shows all day Saturday, stay over, tape shows for much of the day Sunday then head for the airport to go home. He'd do that about half the weekends of the year and usually tape American Bandstand on the other weekends. You'd think, "Gee, they should have been able to find some New York-based personality to host Pyramid who would have been just as good as Dick Clark." But apparently not.

Recommended Reading

David Frum on why this presidential election is like a Penn & Teller routine. I agree with the point he's trying to make but I don't see that the analogy to Penn & Teller applies. For one thing, in this election no one is going to remain silent.

John Tebbel, R.I.P.

Another one. John Tebbel was a clever, nice man I met when he and his wife Martha Thomases were publishing Comedy, a magazine about a subject near and dear to us all. It should have lasted a lot longer than it did…and might have, had they not made the apparently-fatal mistake of having me contribute to it. But I got two friends out of the project and later when Martha went to work at DC Comics, the three of us would sometimes lunch together.

John was actually a good person to do a magazine called Comedy because he was terribly knowledgeable and passionate about great makers of comedy. I suspect he was terribly knowledgeable about everything and passionate about a great many topics. I wish he was still around so we could delve into more of them.

My condolences to Martha. Heidi MacDonald has more.

Dick Clark, R.I.P.

Most of what I have to say about Dick Clark, I've said before here, like in one post which is not easily accessed at the moment so I'll quote from it…

I worked a lot with Dick over a brief period, including producing a show that he hosted but which was not done through his company. If you can set aside a fierce determination to pay everyone as little as possible, my memories of him are all good. I liked the man and I really admired his professionalism and work ethic. He worked like a madman yet still managed to be utterly accessible. If you just walked up to him and said, say, "Little Richard," he'd drop everything that was droppable and tell you ten minutes of Little Richard anecdotes. Or Elvis. Or Ray Charles or anyone. He had, of course, worked with everybody and he had real sharp insights into every aspect of show business.

Great sense of humor. Very little ego. Always on time for everything. Very respectful of the talents and expertise of others. Worked like a dog. Easy to get along with. I can tell you hours of stories of producers, execs and stars who were maniacs and a-holes. I have only good stories about Dick Clark. That is, if you could get past the underlying fear that he wouldn't make every possible dime on every project.

I should add that there was something about him that set him apart from many other producers I worked for and with: He was Dick Clark. He didn't flaunt it but it was tough to be around him and not feel that sense of television history: He'd been everywhere, done everything, met everybody. One time when I was working for him and we were taping, my friend Steve Gerber phoned me on the set. Dick was the nearest person to the phone when it rang so he answered, heard it was for me and called me over. When I picked up the phone, Steve was stammering on the other end: "The person who answered the phone…was that…was that Dick Clark?" By that point, I'd been working with Dick for several months so I thought of him mainly as my boss. But to Steve, it was like he'd dialed a phone number and Santa Claus had answered. Later that day, he came to the set and I introduced him to Dick. Steve was a pretty sophisticated guy but we all have certain people who impress the hell out of us and reduce us to giggling adolescents. For Steve and many others, it was Dick Clark. (And for some, it was Steve Gerber…)

The main points I should underscore about Dick are his professionalism — always on-time, always well-aware of the costs and problems of production — and his graciousness. Oh, and his cheapness too…but I almost didn't mind that. Because he was Dick Clark. His struggle to keep being Dick Clark after his stroke was both sad and inspirational, and I'm sure most who write about him will say something about how New Year's Eve won't be the same without him. Just as television was never the same after he came along. He was one of the greats.

Today's Video Link

Here's a brief chat with the late Arthur Marx, the son of Groucho and a rather successful writer. I knew Arthur a little and liked him. When I was around him, I was semi-afraid to ask him about his father because I figured, probably correctly, that too many people did that. So we talked about his life as a champion tennis player and later about his work in television and on the stage. I probably could have asked him questions like these but I didn't.

The person asking him these questions is Skip E. Lowe, who's kind of a legendary Hollywood figure. He was a child star and entertainer but he's probably best known for his long-running cable access TV show on which he chats with just about everyone in show business at one time or another. It is said that Martin Short's Jiminy Glick character got his interviewing style and maybe his voice from Mr. Lowe. Here's Skip E. talking with Arthur…