An Easter Memory

Once upon a time, the May Company was the sacred place to shop in Los Angeles — especially the formidable outlet at the corner of Wilshire and Fairfax. It marked the west end of a strip of Wilshire full of department stores and that strip was known as the Miracle Mile. It's still called the Miracle Mile even though there isn't a single department store left there. Orbach's is gone. Harris & Frank is gone. Desmond's is gone. Mullen & Bluett is gone and so on. The May Company's lovely building is still there but inside it now is some sort of off-shoot of the L.A. County Museum of Art which is next door.

This memory takes place back when it was still the May Company, inside and out. For two or three years running, they did a special Easter promotion involving Bugs Bunny. Ads would appear giving a special phone number that kids could call to "talk to Bugs Bunny." Well, naturally, I had to call. I think I was six or seven the first time this happened but I knew how to dial a phone. And note that I said "dial," as in running one's finger around on one of these:

phonedial01

So I dialed and got a busy signal. Then I dialed and got a busy signal again. Then I dialed and got a busy signal again. Then I dialed and got a busy signal again. Then I dialed and got a busy signal again. Then I dialed and got a busy signal again. Then I dialed and got a busy signal again. Then I dialed and got a busy signal again. Then I dialed and got a busy signal again. Then I dialed and got a busy signal again. Then I dialed and got a busy signal again. Then I dialed and got a busy signal again. Then I dialed and got a busy signal again. Then I dialed and got a busy signal again. Then I dialed and got a busy signal again. Then I dialed and got a busy signal again. Then I dialed and got a busy signal again. Then I dialed and got a busy signal again. Then I dialed and got a busy signal again. Then I dialed and got a busy signal again. Then I dialed and got a busy signal again. Then I dialed and got a busy signal again. Then I dialed and got a busy signal again. Then I dialed and got a busy signal again. Then I dialed and got a busy signal again. Isn't "cut-and-paste" wonderful? Then I dialed and got a busy signal again. Then I dialed and got a busy signal again. Then I dialed and got a busy signal again.

And finally, it rang. And Bugs picked up.

Well, it wasn't Bugs, of course. Even I knew then it was Mel Blanc. But it also wasn't Mel Blanc. It was the recorded voice of Mel Blanc. But even that was exciting. In later years, it would be no big deal to call some number and hear a recorded announcement. Heck, there would be times when it would be a novelty to dial a number — any number — and not get a recorded announcement. But at the time, this kind of thing was kinda rare…and the fact that it was a cartoon character was very special.

I remember the first thing he said. It was, you may be surprised to hear, "What's up, doc?" And I remember the last thing he said. It was an admonition that I should hang up now so that someone else could get through. In-between, there was a pitch to get my parents to take me to the May Company at Wilshire and Fairfax where Bugs would have a special gift for me and a special, personal message. Well, you can guess where we were going…the next day, in fact. This was a few days before Easter.

That night, I was lying wide awake in bed, as I often did. I didn't sleep much as a kid. I would lie there half the night it seemed, making up incredible stories involving cartoons and characters I saw on TV or read in comic books. They were all about my phone buddy Bugs Bunny that night and I suddenly got the idea that I'd like to hear his message again…and also, I was curious. Was there just the one message or were there several and they rotated? And what would have happened if I hadn't hung up immediately? Would the message have repeated? Would Bugs have said something else?

I checked the clock by my bed at it said it was 4:10 in the morning. I had a hunch the phone might not be quite as busy at 4:10 in the morning.

So as not to awake my parents, I crept carefully out to the kitchen, which is where our only phone was. From all that dialing earlier, I had the number memorized so I called, worrying slightly that Bugs would answer and say angrily, "Hey, didn't you call earlier, kid?"  Or maybe, "What the big idea, waking me up at this hour?"

I got a busy signal. At 4-friggin'-11 in the morning. Someone else obviously had the same idea.

I put some peanut butter on a cracker, ate it and then dialed again. This time, I got through and heard the exact same message I'd heard earlier. At the end, when Bugs said to hang up so someone else could call, I risked him getting mad at me and didn't. And I heard…absolutely nothing. After about a minute, I hung up and went back to bed.

The next day, we went to the May Company. Near the center of the top floor, there was a huge display with big cut-outs of Bugs and Elmer Fudd and Porky Pig and other Warner Brothers characters. The phone message had made it sound like I could actually meet Bugs Bunny there and while I knew that wasn't possible, I figured there'd be something like a guy in a Bugs Bunny suit or a big robot or — and I knew this was a longshot but you tend to dream at that age — maybe they'd have Mel Blanc there.

They didn't. There were two cute young girls dressed in bunny ears and tails. This was a year or two before the Playboy Clubs opened with waitresses in bunny ears and tails and I always wondered if Hugh Hefner or someone working for him drew any inspiration from Bugs' helpers at the May Company. Probably not but you never know.

One gave me a little Bugs Bunny coloring book with a bag of crayons and candy attached. The other was in charge of a telephone on a pedestal. She held out the receiver for me and I took it and heard another message Mel Blanc had recorded. It was something about how he was sorry he was so busy he couldn't be there in person but you know, "us rabbits" are pretty busy just before Easter, painting eggs and figuring out where to hide 'em. He told me to be a good little kid and eat all my carrots and to make sure his helpers gave me his special Easter gift. And then he hung up on me and his assistant yanked the receiver from my grasp.

I didn't feel cheated by this since I'd known going in I wasn't going to really meet Bugs Bunny. I remember being rather thrilled to have gotten that close to him. And then my parents went shopping.

That's about everything I remember about the Bugs Bunny promotion. I'm going to guess they did it the first time in 1958 or 1959 when I was six or seven. If I had to bet, I'd bet the latter. I know they did it at least one following year, maybe two. Same ad in the paper, same message on the phone. We only went to the May Company in response that one time, presuming that since the phone message was the same, the pay-off when you got to the store would be the same. In 1961 or so, they did the same deal with Fred Flintstone, even though, having lived before Christ, his connection to Easter was at best tenuous. A recording by his voice Alan Reed was on the phone and when you went to the May Company, they had two cute ladies in ratty cave girl outfits filling the same function as the bunnies.

What they did have, I think in lieu of a phone message, was a robotic Fred Flintstone. It was a very good likeness about five feet high. His mouth opened and closed, not particularly in sync with a constantly repeating voice recording — Fred welcoming us to the May Company and wishing us Happy Easter. His right arm went up and down. My mother took a photo of me next to him but, damn it, the pictures didn't come out. A day or two later, they trucked the Robot Fred over to the local ABC studios and I saw it "perform" on the morning cartoon show hosted by Chucko the Birthday Clown. The voice didn't work and the moving arm kept stopping and starting, and Chucko (who was a pretty funny guy) kept warning Fred that if he didn't talk, ABC would cancel his prime-time show. I assume that robot is long since gone but I'd give about a year's pay to have it in my living room.

This has been an Easter Memory…and just about the only one this Jewish kid has from his childhood.

Today's Video Link

Two funny friends of mine, Bill Kirchenbauer and Brad Slaight, are giving voice to The Diabetes Duo, Captain Glucose and Meter Boy. Together, the two super-heroes promote Diabetes Awareness…a good and important thing. (The three of us share a mutual friend who lost his feet and later his life because he was Diabetic and didn't take better care of himself.) This message deserves to be spread to a wider audience and we're hoping someone who can make that happen will pick this project up and help the guys take it to the next level. Any producers who read this weblog have a venue in mind? How about comic book publishers?

Meanwhile…in the latest installment, Captain Glucose and Meter Boy appear on a popular late night talk show. That's Marcel Forestieri as the host and here's another clip of him at work.

From the E-Mailbag…

Someone who signs his name "G.E." and is presumably not General Electric, writes about Craig Ferguson getting a bigger studio…

I agree the larger space never made a TV show better. But I think it's to prep him for taking over at 11:30 when Dave retires in 2014 (he'll be 67). So if network TV still exists in its current form in 2014, I think you're looking at Craig Ferguson vs. Jimmy Fallon at 11:30. The networks may or may not decide to keep programming the 12:30 hour. And Dave and Jay will have disappeared as suddenly as Rather, Jennings, and Brokaw.

I may be wrong but I don't see either Ferguson or Fallon as inevitable at 11:30. Some people act like there's some grand tradition in late night of the 12:30 host moving up an hour when the 11:30 guy departs. That's happened exactly once and it was a disaster.

Ferguson reportedly has a contract that guarantees him 11:30 on CBS if Letterman drops dead or something. I find it hard to believe that the network would commit to him in that time slot far in the future. One of the key things that went wrong in the Jay/Conan substitution was that NBC projected that during the five years before Conan took over, Leno's ratings at 11:30 would atrophy and Conan's at 12:30 would remain high. Then the opposite happened.

Do we think CBS is prepared to risk making the same mistake? They may well have Ferguson in mind to succeed Dave but I somehow think they'll leave other avenues open. Maybe Craig has a deal to move into that slot but the contract has a lot of ifs and escapes in case, say, his ratings drop just when Jon Stewart is suddenly a free agent.

When Dave Letterman will retire is a decision that will probably be made wholly by Dave Letterman and it wouldn't surprise me if he didn't know when that might be…or if he decides, then changes his mind, then decides, then changes his mind, etc. The answer may hinge on him answering the question, "What do you do with the rest of your life after you give up doing the only thing you ever wanted to do?" A lot of folks close to Mr. Carson thought it was not good for him to, in effect, have nothing to do all day once he gave up The Tonight Show.

Even if that wasn't really the case with Johnny, I'm inclined to think Letterman won't make that mistake. Is he ready to abandon his little family (staff) and the audiences in New York and retire to that ranch in Montana? His entire career, Dave's shown close to zero interest in appearing on anyone else's program. He'll do Oprah or he went on with Regis a few times in exchange for them visiting him…but even there, I think the formula was that Regis had to do Dave's show 25 times to get one return appearance from Dave. If Letterman finds some other way to remain active, he might set an abdication date. Or if the show starts to plunge and he feels he's despoiling his legacy and/or looking like a has-been who doesn't know when get off the stage, he might retire. I don't know about the former but I don't see the latter happening in the next two or three years.

I also don't see Leno leaving that soon. Then again, his network seems to like to get rid of him when he's in first place so anything can happen. My guess is Fallon would only be one option to take over for him and some pretty high-powered names would also be in contention. Could NBC possibly be thinking of moving their 12:30 guy to 11:30? I mean, we saw how well that worked just three years ago.

April 8

That's a photo of my mother taking a photo of me taking that photo of her. It was shot outside the Paris hotel in Las Vegas, the last time I took her there, which was more than a decade ago.  Carolyn and I took turns pushing her around the town in a borrowed wheelchair and we all had a very good time.  I wish I could take her there again but her health isn't quite up to it.

Where I can take her is out for lunch or dinner here in L.A.  Yesterday, we took her to the Musso & Frank Grill up in Hollywood to celebrate her 90th birthday, which is today.  We went yesterday instead of today because today is Easter and restaurants are too crowded on Easter.  Also, she wanted to go to that restaurant and it's not open on Sundays. She had fried scallops and a lovely bread pudding covered in strawberries, and enjoyed both very much.

For reasons above and beyond longevity, my mother is an extraordinary woman.  She's also pretty funny. Recently at a party where a lot of my friends met her for the first time, I heard the following from many of them: "Oh, it's easy to see you got your sense of humor from your mother, Mark."  I disagree and so does she.  She got her sense of humor from me.  Growing up, I got mine from a bevy of sources: Comic books, MAD, Soupy Sales, Laurel and Hardy, cartoons on TV, Stan Freberg — fittingly, Stan was at that party — and others. And I think my mother learned to talk like me so we could communicate. We still do…and I think the last time we had any sort of argument or reason for anyone to raise their voice, I was still in junior high school. My father didn't yell much, either. I think we had less than a dozen angry moments, the last of which occurred when I moved out and into my own place at age 23. That was more than half my life ago.

I keep reading about dysfunctional families and hearing horror stories from acquaintances who were reared in one. At times, I think I grew up in one of the few functional ones of the 20th century. I had friends…I'd go to their homes and in two or three visits I'd literally hear more yelling and tantrums and threats of discipline than I experienced in my entire childhood. My father was half the reason for that and my mother was the other half.

She's amazed to be 90. Absolutely, utterly amazed. Her mother darn near made it to 100 but my mother didn't expect anything close to that, especially since she's been smoking since she was a teen and has never fully quit. She's cut way, way down but can't give it up altogether. She still has all her wits about her. The body doesn't work so well and she spends an indecent percentage of her life at or in the hospital for check-ups and tests and occasional stays…but she's still well aware of the world she lives in and how long she's lived in it. Yesterday at the restaurant, I asked her what her earliest memory was of something "new" they had in her household. She thought a minute and answered, "Sliced bread." At the time, it was the biggest thing since…well, sliced bread.

One reason she's still around is that she has this great doctor. If you could invent the perfect doctor to take care of an elderly parent, you'd whip up one very much like Dr. Bruce Wasserman. If he lived across the street from her and didn't have any other patients, he'd be perfect. He's been her doctor (and when my father was with us, my father's doctor) for more than thirty years. When my mother turned 80, he surprised her on her birthday by sending flowers. He did that when she hit 85, too. She thought that was the most wonderful thing and I suspect they did more good for her than any prescription he ever wrote.

For a long time after that whenever she had health problems, I'd tell her she had to get better so she wouldn't miss out on the 90 arrangement. No other reason. At dire moments, she'd actually say, "Well, it looks like I won't be around to get the 90th birthday flowers from Dr. Wasserman." She was wrong. Two dozen roses arrived on Friday.

The floral displays get better and better. This one was especially stunning and I've told her she has to stick around just so I can see what Dr. Wasserman sends when she hits 100. She thought about it a moment, shrugged and said, "All right. I'll do it…but only for you!"

Recommended Reading

Relevant to the previous item: Jonathan Chait writes about how politicians love to gin up phony outrage about non-issues. We're in for a lot of this between now and November and I, for one, am outraged about it.

Prompt Action

We've long since reached the point where if Barack Obama drinks a root beer, some prominent Republican or right-wing pundit has to express outrage and tell us why it's shameful for the Leader of the Free World to drink a root beer…never mind that the last six Republican presidents, the exalted Reagan included, drank root beer. Reagan especially doesn't count because he had A&W, whereas Obama's drinking Hires.

One of the stupider accusations of this stripe is that there's something wrong with Obama using a TelePrompter. There's been one on the podium of every political convention for around 50 years and just about every politician has used them, particularly when delivering (as presidents do) prepared speeches that have been released to the press in advance. The exceptions would be someone like Richard Nixon who sometimes (not always) avoided the 'Prompter and just read his speech from paper, which is more honest…how?

Nixon thought using a TelePrompter made him look shifty-eyed on camera…and he may also have been worried about sabotage. It is not a not-uncommon prank on TV shows that use TelePrompters to put something on there that the on-camera reader will read aloud without realizing what he or she is reading until it's out.

I worked a few years on That's Incredible! and we used to do that to the hosts all the time. One time, we were doing the opening where they introduce themselves and just to cause trouble, I had the 'Prompter guy replace "I'm Cathy Lee Crosby" with "I'm Broderick Crawford." Somewhere here, I have a piece of video, probably on Beta, of Ms. Crosby reading the line and then pausing to wonder why she'd just introduced herself as Broderick Crawford.

It may be on the same tape as the clip of Fran Tarkenton reading an admission that he was gay. (Fran, who's a sharp guy, caught on right after he said it…but he's also a good sport so he went right on and read the part about how he'd had sex with every single player on the Minnesota Vikings, especially the Tight Ends…)

I don't know that President Obama is any more or less reliant on TelePrompters than any other Chief Exec. He might use it more often to minimize the slight stammer he has. But the idea that he's unable to speak without it is clearly disproved by the many times he clearly isn't using one…in the presidential debates, for instance, or when he's out in public. Still, some of his detractors want to believe he's not really smart and articulate the same way some want to believe he isn't really the President of the United States because, you know, he was born in Kenya.

If they have any valid point it's when they assert he's reading words that someone else wrote. But that's true of every politician who rises anywhere near the level of President. John F. Kennedy's famous "Ask not" line was from his inaugural address which was largely written by Theodore Sorenson. George W. Bush's famous "Axis of evil" was actually written by David Frum. If we want to start faulting presidents for employing speechwriters, we're going to have to fault all of them.

But the TelePrompter complaint is pretty silly…and it got sillier recently when a Washington Post writer made an issue of Bruce Springsteen using a TelePrompter when performing on stage. A member of Bruce's band, Nils Lofgren, responded with an explanation: The Boss occasionally does completely new numbers, taking requests for tunes he's never performed before. So someone Googles to find the lyrics and tosses them up on the 'Prompter for him. That's quite different. Instead of relying on the device to help him play it safe, Springsteen's using it to try something more adventurous. But really, the response to the Post piece should have been along the line of "Who cares?" Judge what's said or sung, not how the person manages to get it out.

Recommended Reading

Daniel Larison notes the problem with Mitt Romney's (indeed, many Republicans') view of foreign policy: They view everything as "them or us" and think it's a sign of weakness to talk to "them."

Today's Video Link

From 1983: A syndicated TV show visits the offices of MAD magazine, complete with a visit to the office of longtime (he's still working for them!!!) writer, Dick DeBartolo…

Recommended Reading

Fred Kaplan, the only human being in the country who actually reads military budgets, explains why Paul Ryan doesn't understand military budgets. I admit I don't either except that I suspect there's truth in this formula I was told years ago…

That one-third of every U.S. military budget is for necessary expenditures to deal with any possible security need;

That one-third goes to stuff that doesn't or will never work or be needed;

And that one-third goes for toys that our leaders think would be cool to have in a Top Gun sense and which we also will never need or use.

I also remember an anecdote Tip O'Neill used to tell. Some defense-oriented Congressman with much clout in this area wanted to order dozens of a new fighter plane that some company proposed making. Let's call it the Q-1. O'Neill amassed some pretty firm data that showed the Q-1 was a lemon that would consume billions and would never fly. He presented it to the Congressman and suggested, "Instead of wasting all that money on that piece of junk, let's put it into the V-2, which is a superior plane in every way."

The Congressman's response? "We have to have both of them!" (He later accused O'Neill of being "soft on defense" for not wanting to order the Q-1.)

Recently Tweeted by me

  • Today's potatoes are from Brown's Farm in Rexburg, ID. #

Today's Video Link

Speaking of films portraying great comedians — as I was doing here recently and will again shortly — a couple of you like Doug Dinger wrote to ask me about Stan. This was originally a radio play by the British writer Neil Brand, depicting a fictional "last meeting" between Stan Laurel and Oliver Hardy. It received much acclaim so it was made into a TV special. Nik Howden played the young Stan and Jim Norton played the old Stan. Mike Goodenough played the young Oliver and Trevor Cooper played the dying Oliver.

Thanks to a playlist Doug assembled, I can easily embed the whole thing below if you'd like to watch it but I'm not necessarily recommending that you do. I found it overly maudlin for a story of two very funny men. Its intent was certainly admirable and the performances are quite good but…well, it's all about Stan coming to terms with a number of issues in his life, some involving Hardy, some not. I don't know that Mr. Laurel held all or any of those feelings and Mr. Brand didn't, either. Some of the film history is accurate, some is not but I found it difficult to listen to as a radio play and not much easier as a video. Perhaps you'll have better luck than I did…

Today's Political Comment

We continue to be amused by all these attempts to argue that "Republicans don't want Romney" as he continues along, winning way more Republican votes than anybody else.

Last weekend when my radio dial chanced to loiter in the political talk segment of SiriusXM, I heard a little of an interview with a gent who was high up in the campaign of Rick Santorum. I didn't catch his name but he made the expected "it ain't over 'til it's over" point, then made two which struck me as contradictory. One was to cite a list of folks who were running behind at this point in a past election but who still went on to win the nomination. In other words, just because a guy (say, Santorum) doesn't have all the necessary delegates at this stage doesn't mean he won't win.

Okay. But then as he went into attack mode against Mitt Romney, he was talking about how Romney "can't close the deal with voters," which is proof they really don't want him and he can't win an election. In other words, just because a guy (say, Romney) doesn't have all the necessary delegates at this stage…well, that indicates he can't and won't win.

Santorum's rep was also trying to argue that all Romney has going for him is "the mantle of inevitability." Or to put it another way, people who really don't want him are voting for him because they hear other people are voting for him. I don't know how much truth there is in that. It seems to me Romney was leading the pack from the start, well before he could possibly have been viewed as "inevitable." But even if he is coasting on his frontrunner status, that's the way a lot of people win elections…and another way of saying, "A lot of people aren't voting for Rick Santorum because he looks like a loser."