Number one hundred and twenty-three in a series…
Monthly Archives: January 2012
Seems Like Old Times
My e-mail suggests many of you are interested in my struggles with blogging software. The most recent problem has been with a program I was using to post messages to the old version of this blog. As you might imagine, I sometimes compose a message here and then don't post it. I switched my posting program over to post on the new newsfromme and it has recently been deciding to post my old, never-posted messages here. It put up an obit for someone who'd died a year ago. I took that down and, I thought, fixed things so it wouldn't happen again. It happened again. I took that one down and it put up the one about In-N-Out Burger moving into Texas. That one's a year old but it's still more-or-less valid so I left it up.
I'm pretty sure I've fixed it so it won't happen again. But if you see a message here where I fearlessly predict Arnold Schwarzenegger will never be governor of California, you'll know the reason.
Steverino 'n' Johnny
Quick: Name a show that was hosted by Steve Allen and later by Johnny Carson.
If you said The Tonight Show, you're right…unless someone wants to nitpick. Allen's version was only called Tonight, not The Tonight Show.
But there's another, inarguable answer and we have it today over at our sister site, Old TV Tickets.
Today's Video Link
I am of the opinion that there are no such things as genuine psychic powers. I also do not believe in telekinesis or communicating with the dead or anything of the sort. There are some folks who believe in these things who amaze me because they seem so smart and rational about matters of reality but they toss their sense of logic away when someone claims to have a message of peace from their dead grandfather or something. There are also those who make a vat full of money by preying on the gullible and/or grieving.
So I very much admire and respect the work that James Randi has done over the years, "debunking" (a term he doesn't like) the Uri Gellers and Peter Popoffs of the world. He can't put them out of business. There are too many people out there who, even when shown the lame magic tricks that are employed, want to believe. But The Amazing Randi (as he was called when he was a full-time magician and a good one) has helped many to see the light.
Last September, Randi appeared at the Magic Castle not to do tricks but to be interviewed about his work by Max Maven. Max does a "mentalist" act that is admitted trickery…though if he claimed his feats were done via powers from God, he could probably make a fortune from folks who'd cough up their life savings (literally) for readings. Maven interviewed Randi for more than a hundred minutes before a roomful of magic scholars and practitioners, making for a fascinating evening. I was in that audience and when Maven got his subject to commit to come back for Part Two, I made a mental note to come back for that. That's where I was last evening.
It was another riveting conversation. Among many other topics, Randi spoke about the Million Dollar Challenge offered by his base of operations, the James Randi Educational Foundation. Put simply, they have a million smackers for anyone who can demonstrate some actual paranormal ability (E.S.P., talking with the departed, etc.) under scientific test conditions. The challenge was first offered in 1964 for $10,000. Even since it was upped to a cool million, no one has ever won it or shown any powers that came close.
None of the prominent psychics or psychic healers have ever applied though a few said they would and didn't. The usual excuse they give is to say something like, "I checked and the offer is bogus. Randi doesn't have the million dollars." That reason doesn't even make sense. Even if Randi didn't have the prize money, the publicity from winning his challenge would be worth several million to anyone who did it, plus it would neuter a man who's caused a lot of woe and financial obstacle to folks in their profession. They could also sue him for breach of contract or something of the sort. But as it happens, Randi does have the million and has posted sufficient info on his website that would enable anyone to contact his bank and verify this. According to him this past evening, no one has ever even called the bank to inquire. What does that tell you about claimed psychics?
Anyway, I greatly enjoyed hearing the second interview and I'll be going back for the third whenever they schedule it. I also enjoyed talking with Randi after the event, hoping that a little of his energy (at age 83) would transfer to me.
If you're sorry you couldn't be there for either conversation…well, I can help a little. Embedded below is the entirety of the first chat from last September. It runs an hour and 48 minutes and if you start watching it, don't blame me if you get hooked and watch the whole thing. Enjoy…
Recommended Reading
Andrew Sullivan, who calls himself a Conservative and was once less arguably one, assesses the strengths and strategies of Barack Obama. I think I agree with most of this. Sullivan even says the same thing I said about the mission that killed Osama Bin Laden: "If George Bush had taken out bin Laden, wiped out al Qaeda's leadership, and gathered a treasure trove of real intelligence by a daring raid, he'd be on Mount Rushmore by now." (I said my version of that here.)
Martin Luther King Day
I don't know how long it will be online but Playboy has posted on its site the entirety of the magazine's 1965 with Dr. Martin Luther King. It's a superb summary of his thoughts at the time and his observations about the civil rights struggles of the past and those that loomed ahead. Beware of photos of naked women in and around this fine conversation.
Elisberg Strikes Again!
Each year, we have this ceremony called the Golden Globe Awards and each year, my amigo Robert J. Elisberg writes some version of his annual column on why the awards are even more meaningless than you think. Click on Bob's name in the previous sentence and read this year's screed and remember two things: (1) Bob is absolutely, totally correct and no one disputes his facts and (2) No one cares that these awards are a farce because they help sell tickets and lots of folks enjoy the party, as spectators if not attendees.
And I should also add (3) which is that some people just love getting awards so much, they like to pretend they mean a lot more than they do.
Great Photos of Stan Laurel and/or Oliver Hardy
Number one hundred and twenty-two in a series…
Burger Wars?
Sez here that In-N-Out Burger is opening a distribution center in Texas which will then enable them to begin opening outlets in that state. Wonder if they have in mind to try to do there to Five Guys what Five Guys seems to be trying to do to them in California, which is to go head-to-head. A lot of new Five Guys here are being situated very close to In-N-Out shops. It's like they're saying, "Fine…you've identified and nurtured an area where people like this product. Now, we'll move into that area and sell them a version they'll prefer." There are currently 52 Five Guys restaurants in Texas with another 20-30 being developed. Let's see if In-N-Out tries to build near them or if they'll try to stake out areas where Five Guys hasn't established a presence.
Today's Video Link
This is a 19 minute conversation with one of my favorite people in comics, Joe Sinnott. Joe was and is a fabulous artist but at one point in his career — around '62 — he became more useful to Stan Lee as an inker…so an inker he's been ever since. He's made bad artists look good and good artists look better.
Those of you with little or no interest in comic book art might want to watch some of this anyway, just to hear a man with great talent and well-placed pride. As you'll see, Joe has always cared passionately about doing good work. It helps to remember that he worked in comics at a time when there was very little (if any) financial reward for extra effort. There was, in fact, a penalty: If you're paid by the page and you spend more time on a page, you make less money per week. For much of his career, Joe was paid about the same as guys who either had less talent or who put less effort into their work…or both. Even when he was paid more to ink a page, he was paid something like 15% more than someone who put in 50% as much time and Joe was three times as good.
If you want to know why someone would do that — why they'd do more than they were being paid to do — watch this video and see the kind of person Joe is. You'll also understand why so many of us love this guy, personally as well as professionally…
Go See It!
Drew Friedman, who draws great caricatures for MAD magazine, salutes the movie poster art of someone else who did that. We always enjoyed the art of the late Jack Rickard.
More Blogs 2 Read
Following the redesign and restart of this site, we've done makeovers on two of our other crannies on the web. When my pal Earl Kress passed away last September, I quickly put up a site about him at www.earlkress.com. It served its purpose but now that I've had the time to do something nicer at that address, it's now had a full makeover. Go take a look and read about a great guy that a lot of us miss a lot.
Also, I've given www.oldtvtickets.com a facelift and also, after a long period of neglect, begun posting new entries over there. The premise is pretty simple: I post a ticket to the taping, filming or live performance of a TV show (or occasionally, a radio program) and try to tell you a little something about the show. If that sounds like it could be fun, go see if it is.
While I've got you here: The archives for this weblog are all online and accessible through the right menu. Most of 'em are under "My Old Weblog" but as some have realized and written me, I don't yet have a search engine working for that section. I'll get to it, I'll get to it. Sorry for any inconvenience. I'm slowly working my way back into the good graces of Google so that may help you for now to locate a specific old post you seek.
Great Photos of Stan Laurel and/or Oliver Hardy
Number one hundred and twenty-one in a series…
Food, Inglorious Food
I've occasionally mentioned my food allergies on this site and each mention brings e-mails from kindred spirits who've related their own social-type problems in this area. It's amazing how many people have trouble with the concept that some folks simply cannot eat certain things without harming themselves. I had a lady friend once who loved asparagus and wanted badly to cook it for me despite my repeated explanations that it could well put me in a hospital somewhere. She'd listen to that, nod as if she utterly understood then say, "Well, what if I put a sauce on the asparagus?
Sometimes, it helps to invoke rat poison analogies. Someone will say, "I can prepare the pecan pie so it doesn't taste anything like pecans." I often reply, "Supposing someone wanted to serve you rat poison but they said, 'Don't worry…I can prepare it so it doesn't taste anything like rat poison."
Or a well-meaning friend will try to serve you a dessert that's sprinkled with coconut. You explain as politely as possible that you're allergic to coconut. They say, "Well, just pick the coconut off…or I can do it for you." You have to say, "If someone came to you with a dessert covered with rat poison, would you just pick the rat poison off and eat the dessert?" There actually are times when I feel I can remove or eat around the offending ingredient but there are times when a little voice within me says not to take the risk. When I don't listen to that voice, I have almost always regretted it.
Actually, if you get medical about it, most of what I have are not food allergies but food intolerances. There is a difference but I learned that if I tried to make that distinction, it confused people even more. So I just say "food allergies" for both and that makes life simpler…but only a little.
Both can create vast social problems along with the health ones. I have occasionally found myself in a group at a restaurant where there was literally nothing on the menu I thought I could or should eat. You would be amazed how uncomfortable some friends can make you in that situation. Some treat you like you're making trouble in order to ruin their evening. Others feel that now they're not allowed to eat and enjoy themselves. The worst is probably when they make a huge fuss on your behalf and start scolding waiters and the restaurant management, and that makes everyone uncomfy. I accept the fact that there are just going to be times when the available food doesn't correspond to what I can eat. I would usually prefer to sit there and go hungry for the time being than to have people declare a national emergency around me or act like an alien dines among them.
It was worse when I was younger and in less control of where I ate. Today, if the whole gang's going out for lunch, I can usually speak up in time to genially steer the expedition away from the Indian or Mexican restaurant. I've had especially bad luck in the Mexican ones. I've probably gone through the menus of fifty of them without seeing an entree I could eat without serious modification…and it's sometimes difficult to get things altered to my specifications. One day years ago, I was among a bunch of TV people who lunched at Acapulco, a popular Mexican eatery then across the street from NBC in Burbank. The one item they had that seemed like it might be edible to me was the hamburger…but only if they omitted the guacamole.
That was how I ordered it…and I've learned over the years to be explicit about it. I'll say, "I'd like a hamburger with nothing on it. Just meat and bun and nothing else." I asked for it that way but when it came, there was guacamole aplenty. In fact, I think the chef had interpreted "no guacamole" to mean "extra guacamole." You'd be amazed how often that happens.
I sent the burger back and it was returned to me a few minutes later with most (not all) of the guacamole scraped off. The patty was still a lovely shade of green and when I explained that wouldn't do, the server gave me a sigh that implied I was just doing this to make his life harder. He went off to have them cook me another and I sat there, not eating while all my friends did. Every so often, one of them would offer me part of their tostada which I couldn't eat or part of their burrito which I couldn't eat. Finally, about the time everyone was ready to leave, my new burger arrived…lovingly slathered with guacamole. They told me the chef applied it out of "force of habit."
Some of this is my fault. There are times when everyone else wants to go for Thai food. Since I want to be with my friends and since I occasionally have gotten something edible in a Thai place, I decide not to play Bad Guy and try to hijack the party to where I'll feel safer. I have to learn to decline. Forced to appear at a luncheon where the cuisine seems dubious, I'll sometimes opt to dine before I get there and to tell everyone I had a late breakfast and can't eat a thing. I need to think that way more often. The Internet has helped a lot, enabling me to check out the menu of most restaurants before I commit to dine within.
Great Photos of Stan Laurel and/or Oliver Hardy
Number one hundred and twenty in a series…