Number one hundred and twenty-eight in a series…
Monthly Archives: January 2012
Recommended Reading
Matthew Yglesias on how Newt Gingrich's tax plans differ from the plans of those competing with him for the G.O.P. nomination. I don't think those differences matter much since, first of all, I still don't think he'll get that nomination. As Barney Frank said, Democrats just don't have that kind of luck. It would also be a pretty short hop — one that wouldn't even evoke cries of "flip-flop" — for Gingrich to move to any other Republican plan.
You know, I don't care a whole heap about Gingrich's divorces or his Tiffany credit line or his yearning for an "open marriage." To me, it's only relevant as further evidence that some people in this country will overlook anything if a guy on their team does it. My right-wingest pal Roger is always telling me "character counts" and that certain things in the past of this Democrat or that Democrat prove the person is unfit to hold public office because of the kind of man he is. But he's for Newt, ethics violations and all.
I suspect the appeal is that he expects Newt would put on a better show — one he'd enjoy the same way he enjoys Rush Limbaugh bashing Liberals all day, even when it requires making stuff up. I think Roger will get his wish for a lot of that this year but I still don't think the Republican leadership wants to peg its future on a candidate like Newt Gingrich.
Today's Video Link
I'll wager few of you are familiar with Charles Hutchison but he was kind of the Jackie Chan of silent movies. He started in films around 1914 when he was 35 years old, which seems late in life to begin a career doing dangerous stunts. As it happens, though all the promotion for his "Hutch" serials like Hurricane Hutch and Lightning Hutch swore that he performed all his own feats, most film historians think doubles were often employed. One source says Hutchison didn't employ stuntmen at first but after several injuries to his arms, it became necessary.
Anyway, he appeared in daredevil films for about ten years, then segued to less strenuous roles and to (mostly) directing and screenwriting. He died in 1949 and his last known film work was a non-stunt appearance in the 1944 Captain America serial.
Many of his films exist today only because John Hampton, the proprietor of the Silent Movie Theater here in L.A., found prints of them in the attic of some old, long-closed theater in the Mid-West. When Hampton ran them at his theater in the sixties, that may have been the first time they'd been projected since talkies were invented.
You can't really see him in these excerpts but Mr. Hutchison was a stiff, unimpressive looking man who was pretty boring when he (that is, allegedly he) wasn't diving from a great height into a lake or leaping from a moving train. In each chapter of his serials, he either did something like that or looked like he was about to — and you'd have to come back next week to see him actually do it.
It's been a long time since I've seen a "Hutch" film but I do recall a couple of outright cheats, not in the deeds but in the coverage of them. At the end of Chapter 8, you'd see him drive his car off a cliff and it would crash on the rocks below indicating certain death for its driver. At the beginning of Chapter 9, they'd start with the same footage…only this time, there'd be an insert shot of Hutch bailing out of the car just before it went over. Audiences at the Silent Movie Theater who'd seen both chapters would sit there and boo the long-deceased Charles Hutchison.
Here he is in action. Or maybe some of this is his stunt doubles in action…
My Tweets for 2012-01-22
- Stephen Colbert should demand a recount in South Carolina. And he probably would if he was on the ballot. #
- Newt did okay in South Carolina. Imagine how many votes he'd have gotten if anyone actually liked him. #
- Someone ask Newt, "Does the public have a right to know as much about your sex life as you wanted them to know about Bill Clinton's?" #
Recommended Reading
The columnist with the ironic (in this case) name Colbert I. King doesn't find Stephen Colbert's electoral routine very funny. I do but you might want to read his viewpoint.
Great Photos of Stan Laurel and/or Oliver Hardy
Number one hundred and twenty-seven in a series…
Today's Political Musing
Not that my rooting interest will change anything but I'm not sure who I'm hoping will be the Republican nominee. I think any of them will make health care worse in this country, skew the government so it favors the wealthy even more than it already does, and be more likely to get us into a reckless war. Ron Paul might not do the third of these but Ron Paul ain't gonna be the nominee — in part because of that. Mitt Romney seems like he'd be less destructive than Newt Gingrich. Then again, Mitt Romney seems to have more chance of beating Obama than Newt Gingrich.
(I just corrected a funny typo in the previous line. I realized I'd typed "Mitt Romney seems to have more chance of being Obama than Newt Gingrich." That might also be so.)
And not that I think Obama has been the Chief Exec of my dreams, either. Some of that has been because he probably was never as left of center as some of us hoped. The rest is due to G.O.P. control of the House and a near-control, in tandem with timid Democrats, of the Senate. I have friends who are angry at Obama for not passing Single Payer Health Care and jailing Cheney for war crimes. Politics, they forget, is The Art of the Possible.
My view of Obama is a lot like the one expressed in that Andrew Sullivan article to which I linked. I see that Fox News is routinely having guests on to savage Sullivan's piece but at last report, they were refusing Sullivan's offers to come on and defend what he wrote. Fair and balanced.
The main thing I think I want right now is to tune out this election and tune back in…oh, around early October when what's being said will have more relevance to who's going to win. Then again, if I did that I'd miss a lot of great Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert material. It's going to be a long year.
Today's Video Link
Stephen Colbert was on MSNBC's Morning Joe yesterday morning and was pretty funny. See if you don't agree…
My Tweets for 2012-01-21
- Now I'm in Whole Foods where if you buy a jar of Healthy Planet Whey Protein, you get a photo of yourself with Fabio. If you buy 2 jars…
# - Sitting at the Farmers Market, having a hot turkey sandwich with my pal Mickey Paraskevas, whose name uses up most of my 140 characters.
# - So who do I root for to be the G.O.P. nominee? The guy who'd do the least damage? Or the guy it would be easier for Obama to beat?
#
Recommended Reading
The stupidest opinion column anyone has ever written.
Great Photos of Stan Laurel and/or Oliver Hardy
Number one hundred and twenty-six in a series…
The Legendary Dr. Grossman
Recently here, I referred to my childhood pediatrician, Dr. Arthur Grossman, as legendary. That's a bit of overstatement but let me tell you why it's only a bit…
Dr. Grossman was often written about in local newspapers for either of two reasons. One was that he was "The Pediatrician to the Stars." He treated the children of celebs like Jerry Lewis and Jack Lemmon. If you read the official biography of Jack Lemmon, you may remember how Mr. Lemmon put a little of his career on the line to narrate a TV documentary that ripped into the auto industry for air and water pollution. My Dr. Grossman was the man who recruited Lemmon for that project.
Not only that but Dr. Grossman was also a talented musician. He was a member of a group called the Los Angeles Doctors' Symphony Orchestra that used to perform at charity events. I found this clipping online in a 1957 magazine article and hi-lighted him…
I don't know why but the notion of an all-doctor orchestra always intrigued me. I had a dream one night where I'm attending one of their events and a person in the audience passes out. The faintee's companion calls out, "Is there a doctor in the house?" and the entire orchestra drops its instruments and runs down to treat the guy.
The thing about Dr. Grossman was that he was everywhere. He had one of the busiest practices in Beverly Hills but he still made house calls when appropriate. One time when it was appropriate was when I was very young and had Scarlet Fever. He came to our home not once but several times…and I still think of that when I'm at a hospital or doctor's office and see folks who look like it took every ounce of energy they had left just to get there…and they're coughing and hacking and sending out germs by the fleet.
Even after I'd graduated to adult-type doctors, he kept popping up in my life. He was involved in every campaign to protect the health of children. When I met anyone else in the world of medicine, personally or professionally, I could drop two names. One was Dr. William Swanson, who lived across the street from us for a few years. I'll tell you about him in a separate piece soon. The other was Dr. Grossman. Everyone who'd ever graduated med school seemed to know both of them and to swear by their integrity as much as they did the Hippocratic Oath.
One night — this was around 1973 — I took a date to the Music Center downtown to see a play, then we went over to Chinatown for a long, late dinner. Around 1 AM, we were driving back down Wilshire Boulevard and we were nearing the intersection of Wilshire and Robertson, which is where Dr. Grossman had his office. I had not been to that office in at least ten years.
A Chrysler driven by someone who'd obviously ingested too much liquor came roaring up behind me doing well over the speed limit. It swerved to pass me, entered the intersection, swerved again in some way we didn't see, ran up onto the curb on the opposite (oncoming) side of Wilshire, then flipped over. A very ugly crash. Looking at it, I would not have been surprised if that driver had been killed on impact.
I pulled over and my lady friend and I dashed over to the wrecked car, which had done a complete 360° rotation and was sitting, rightside up but largely destroyed, in the middle of Wilshire Boulevard. The driver seemed to be alive but the car was starting to smolder, like it was on fire and likely to explode. It never did explode but at that moment, it seemed awfully possible.
The door on the driver's side was locked but the window on the opposite passenger's side was down enough that we were able to get in. She pushed and I pulled a drunk-outta-his-mind driver out and dragged him away from the vehicle. The man was injured and bleeding and not sure what was happening.
A few other cars had pulled over around us and I started to yell towards them, "Somebody call for an ambulance." Before I could, the driver of one ran up…with a doctor's bag.
We just stepped back and let him handle things…and by the time an ambulance, a fire truck and several police cars arrived, he'd stopped all the bleeding and had the man laid out on the street in a position that would do not further damage to his broken bones. When the paramedics arrived, he supervised the treatment and the load-in to the ambulance. The paramedics, I noticed, seemed to know who he was…and I started to think that I did, as well.
As we were giving statements to the police, I heard him give his name and, sure enough: Dr. Arthur M. Grossman.
I must have shrieked, "Dr. Grossman!" I told him who I was and he said, "You've grown."
We had a nice moment of bonding/reunion in the middle of Wilshire Boulevard with street flares burning around us. Then we got into our respective autos, drove off and I never saw him again. He passed away — in the late seventies or early eighties, I think. I just recall reading the obit in the L.A. Times and being amazed at all the accomplishments they listed for him. Quite a guy.
In the mid-nineties, it dawned on me that I didn't really have a doctor. I had a dentist and an opthamologist and a few other specialists but no general practitioner. I was almost never sick so I didn't need one but obviously, one can only stay that way for so long. I went to one that my dentist recommended and didn't like him. Then I went to one that a friend recommended and I didn't like him. Then one day I asked my opthamologist to recommend a physician and he referred me to a Dr. Paul Geller who was, he said, the best doctor in Beverly Hills. I later learned this was a widely-held opinion among others. Anyway, I made an appointment to meet Dr. Geller and kind of interview him, and I went to his office, which was on Wilshire, a few blocks west of Robertson. He was a nice, wise man and I liked him instantly.
He asked me who my previous doctor was. I said, "I really don't have one. I was under my parents' Kaiser account in my teenage years and after that, I never needed a doctor for the longest time. I guess the last steady doctor I had was my pediatrician. He was just down the street from here."
Dr. Geller asked me, "Was it by any chance Dr. Arthur Grossman?"
I was startled. I said, "You knew him?"
Dr. Geller pointed to a photo on the wall of his office. It was a picture of a much-younger him with his best friend and roommate from medical school…Arthur Grossman. "A great guy," Dr. Geller said. "Except that he used to wake me up all the time practicing that damn flute of his."
Today's Video Link
For many years, the cheapest show on prime time was a game that producer Mike Stokey kept selling, at first under the name Pantomime Quiz and later as Stump the Stars. Either way, it was two teams, each with four celebrities, playing charades. It was at varying times on CBS, NBC, ABC and even the Dumont network, plus there was a syndicated version. Sometimes, networks used it as an emergency filler. If you had a sudden hole on your schedule, Stokey could have his show up and running in a matter of days…and it didn't cost much.
This episode is a Stump the Stars from November 26, 1962 and it features four of the show's regular competitors going up against the cast of The Dick Van Dyke Show. It's one of the few episodes not hosted by Mike Stokey. When CBS took the show on in September of '62, they insisted that Stokey not host it, as he'd done in all the previous versions. Pat Harrington was the host…but not for long. A month or so after this one, Harrington was gone and Stokey was back without explanation. Next time I see Pat, I'll ask him wha' happened but I'll bet the answer will simply be that Stokey wanted to host it himself and finally persuaded CBS that Harrington didn't add any value, ratings-wise.
This runs close to a half-hour. Someone uploaded it to YouTube in two parts and they should play in sequence in the player below…
My Tweets for 2012-01-20
- Uh, if anyone's near the Hollywood sign, I seem to have lost a few things up there. I can't quite describe them… #
- I'm posting this from an Italian restaurant. They're playing Sinatra records. Can you imagine such a thing? #
- Everyone in S.C. who was going to vote for Perry will now vote for Gingrich. Newt must be happy about picking up the nine votes. #
Cold, Cold Callers
So once again after a lull, I'm getting all these calls from contractors I've never heard of, offering me free estimates on any work I need done on my house. As it happens, I have a fine contractor and there's no work I need done…but obviously, some company is selling my number as part of a database of potential customers and I see no way to stop this. The "Do Not Call" registry, in which I am listed, only applies to the callers, not to the suppliers…and none of the callers calls me more than once.
Here is how the calls have been going lately. A total stranger calls and begins to tell me about their fine company. Often, they say they're "in my area" doing work for some of my neighbors at the moment. I interrupt them and here's how it goes…
ME: Excuse me. Could you tell me where you got this number?
THEM: Got your number? It comes up on a screen here.
ME: Okay, but where did your company get it in order to put it on your screen?
THEM: I really don't know.
ME: Well, if I'm going to hire a contractor, they're going to have to prove they're trustworthy. And if you won't answer that question for me, you're not trustworthy.
And they mutter something like, "Sorry to have taken up your time" and they hang up. So far, not one of them has offered to tell me where they got the number in order to prove their integrity. If one ever does, I'll let you know…after I inform them I don't need a contractor.