Well, this is interesting. The rape case against French politician Dominique Strauss-Kahn is collapsing, in large part (assuming stories like this are true) because the victim has severe credibility problems. From the outset, it looked the lawyers for Mr. Strauss-Kahn were going to argue that and it's looking like they found what they were hoping to find.
So the question is becoming: Will Strauss-Kahn walk (or get a light punishment) because he really and truly did not rape the lady in question? Or will he walk (or get a light punishment) because no court will or would believe enough of what she says to find the accused guilty? All I know is that whatever happens, what Ben Stein wrote right after the incident is still really, really stupid.