Today's Video Link

In 1969, the Three Stooges didn't have many offers to do any stooging so their manager Norman Maurer came up with an idea. Norman was a former comic book artist (at one point, the partner of Joe Kubert) who'd married Moe's daughter and become a successful producer and writer of both live-action movies and animation, some of which featured the Stooges. He was also a very clever man with a good head for business. I worked with him years later on the Richie Rich cartoon show and I always thought there was a little of Richie in Norman.

At the time, he had some connections in the TV syndication market and an idea on how to put Larry, Moe and Curly Joe into a new series even though they were getting too old to do much of their traditional physical comedy. Moe Howard was 72, Larry Fine was 67 and Joe DeRita was a mere 60 but in poor health. Still, all three still liked the idea of performing and really liked the idea of travelling, especially if someone else was going to pay for it.

This led Norman to envision a series he called Kooks Tour, which would be a kind of funny travelogue. Each week, the Stooges — ostensibly retired — could travel somewhere and get into as much mischief as they could handle but a big star of the show would be the scenery. There were, Norman knew, tourist bureaus that would contribute to the budget of such a program in order to bring it to their corner of the world and he worked a deal with the folks who made and sold Chryslers to kick in for some product placement.

Still, that budget would have to be pretty low. They would do it with 16mm cameras and a large part of it would be travel footage with Stooge narration, and with Norman's whole family working on it, both in front of and behind the cameras. In the clip below, one of the two male campers is Norman and the other is his son Jeff, who writes TV under the name Jeffrey Scott. (Hi, Jeff! Lunch soon?) The woman who encounters Curly Joe is Lois Goleman, Norman Maurer's administrative assistant. Joan Howard Maurer, Norman's wife and Moe's daughter (and a terrific lady I haven't seen in too many years) was credited for Costumes. Norman wrote and directed and also wound up stunt-doubling for various Stooges in some shots.

They all travelled to Wyoming and Idaho to shoot an hour special that Norman thought he could use to sell a half-hour weekly series…and the idea might have worked but Larry took ill. Before filming was completed, he suffered a stroke that ended his performing career and therefore the Three Stooges as we knew them. There was later a brief attempt to replace him in the act with longtime Stooge supporting player Emil Sitka but it went nowhere. Larry and then Moe passed in '75 and Joe left us in '93.

Maurer gave up on Kooks Tour as a series but edited the completed footage as well as he could. He recouped some of the investment by releasing it into the home movie marketplace and later when home video came along, it had a brief life there, billed as the Three Stooges' final film. I find something oddly pleasant about it. I guess I like the idea that those three nitwits really did retire and spend their last years travelling together and being less violent buddies who still got into trouble. Here's about ten minutes of it…

VIDEO MISSING

Early Wednesday Morning

A lot of folks are debating if it's wrong to feel elation at the death of someone even if that someone is Osama Bin Laden. I don't think it makes you a bad person if you do or you don't. If it bothers you, set yourself some reasonable dividing line…like it's okay to cheer the demise of someone who caused 1000 or more innocent people to die. I think that's about where the cutoff point would be for me. If I'm in a compassionate mood, maybe 1500.

My own sense of elation over the announcement came from a number of different places, none in the vein of "that bastard deserved to die." I was happy that there was some potential closure there for folks still feeling the pains of 9/11. It may not matter to some but it's there for those who want to grab it. I also thought America is in bad need of a "win" and this can be viewed as a big one. And maybe the first thing I thought was, "Good…no trial."

I believe that any person — yes, even the killer of 1000+ people — is entitled to a fair trial, complete with genuine legal representation. I just don't think there's any way Osama Bin Laden could ever have received anything resembling a fair trial…and the logistics and jurisdictional disputes would have been nightmares. I'll bet at least a year and thousands of man hours would have been spent just to decide where to have it. His attorneys would have been attacked as terrorist enablers. There would have been demonstrations outside and hourly bomb scares and speeches and grandstanding and…jeez, what a mess. If the man could had a trial with no showboating and overlays of martyrdom, great. Take him alive. But does anyone really think he could have been tried in a court of law? For real?

And what if he'd gotten the first O.J. jury?

Class Act

Congrats to my longtime pals Bill and Cheri Steinkellner. This morning, they became Tony nominees for the book they wrote for the Broadway musical, Sister Act. They are good, bright people deserving of every possible honor. And I'm not just saying that in the hope of scoring house seats, next time I go to New York.

Recommended Reading

Jonathan Chait on how those who back the Paul Ryan plan to (among other things) slash medical care for the poor are getting upset when being accused of wanting to (among other things) slash medical care for the poor.

Today's Bonus Video Link

Immediately following the Royal Wedding, the speedy Fred Landau had a clever song parody up on YouTube and we linked you to it. Reaction was so strong that he went ahead and produced a more polished version with a great vocal by Jan Horvath. So here's the upgrade…

Recommended Reading

Republicans hated the "individual mandate" provision of the Affordable Care Act — the part that said you had to buy health insurance. Many called it Socialism or Communism or at least a tyrannical intrusion by the government into our lives. But most Republicans are behind the Paul Ryan proposal which pretty much does the same thing.

Future Schlock

One thing that annoys me about the punditry today is that there never seems to be any penalty for being wrong. If a doctor consistently misdiagnosed patients, he or she would soon be working as a Walmart greeter. But in today's political intelligentsia, you can make prediction after prediction that proves incorrect and no one even notices. Certainly no one loses their job for being wrong as is proven by the continued employment of Dick Morris and William Kristol.

Recently, a class at Hamilton College in New York analyzed the predictions of 26 political prognosticators between September 2007 and December 2008. What they found was that a lot of them were wrong an awful lot of the time. They found fifteen predictions by Cal Thomas, for instance and judged one correct, 13 wrong and one "hedged." You wouldn't let your lawn be mowed by a guy with that kind of track record. They didn't study Kristol or Morris, who I expect would have done worse. The pundit with the best record in their survey was Paul Krugman.

This link will take you to a 59-page PDF file of their findings. I was hoping they'd itemize all the predictions and show how they scored them but only a few are cited. If you see where they have put all this data up for inspection, please let me know.

Today's Video Link

Here's a blast from my past…a video which should not be on YouTube. But before they delete it and haul the uploader off to prison for the rest of his or her natural life, I thought I'd share it with you. It's an episode I wrote for the old Garfield and Friends show entitled "The Lasagna Zone." This is the late Lorenzo Music as the cat, Thom Huge as Jon and Binky…and Gregg Berger as Odie.

Frank Welker did the amazing Rod Serling impression and as I recall, he did it without reference. I was going to bring a tape of the real Mr. Serling to the recording session for Frank to listen to but I skillfully left it home and was relieved when Frank said, "Not necessary." Berger and Welker did all the other voices you'll hear as well. Hope you enjoy it.

VIDEO MISSING

From the E-Mailbag…

D. Altshuler writes…

I agree with you of course that the next presidential election is a long way off and many things can and will happen between now and then. But are you really suggesting that Obama's election chances didn't just get a tremendous boost last night?

No, I think everything a President does and doesn't do affects his shot at another term. I'm just saying that the polls any minute now which will give him a big X% bump in his approval rating will be a distant memory by the time this nation votes. I always remember that sketch on Saturday Night Live in 1991 in which four prominent Democrats (Richard Gephardt, Mario Cuomo, Bill Bradley and Tipper Gore standing in for Al) debated and each argued against being the nominee of their party because whoever was was going to be crushed by George Herbert Walker Bush. This was back when those four names were being mentioned and most folks hadn't even heard of this Bill Clinton guy.

That sketch aired on November 2, 1991, which was 367 days before Bush lost…and lost rather badly to Clinton. Well, today is 554 days before America votes to see if Obama gets another term or if not, who takes over. And if anything, the news cycles have gotten more volatile with folks getting hysterical over every little thing. If Bush seemed unbeatable a year before that election, how could anything Obama did make him a shoo-in a year and a half before he stands for re-election?

What he has done though is make it a lot harder to hang things on him like "He's really on the side of the terrorists" and "He's a pussy when it comes to defense." That's not nothing…and that plus the smell of some economic recovery in the air and the Republicans' sorry slate of candidates make Obama look about as secure as anyone could look this far out. I just have this bizarre idea that something could possibly happen in the next 554 days which will have some impact, one way or the other, on the election.

Talking Turkey

turkeypotroast01

My recent postings about Hot Turkey Sandwiches seem to have sent many of you scurrying to find a good one. Hope you enjoyed yours and that it was even half as good as the ones I enjoy at Magee's Kitchen in the Farmers Market at 3rd and Fairfax here in Los Angeles.

I seem to have become quite a connoisseur of turkey and if you live in Los Angeles, the following may be of value to you. They make an incredible turkey meatloaf at a little hole-in-the-plaster restaurant called The Main Course on Pico in West L.A. Also, if you shop at a Gelson's Market, you may have seen how the deli department has a guy who carves roast turkey that they sell by the pound. It's superb turkey but I'll let you in on a secret. If you ask (this isn't advertised), they'll sell you an entire turkey thigh — cooked and juicy and warm and delicious and with meat enough for 3-4 meals — for under three bucks. Such a deal. Such a delight.

Which brings us to maybe my favorite way to eat turkey. It's the Jennie-O Turkey Pot Roast — a heat-at-home hunk of dark meat that's been slo-cooked to make it oh so moist and oh so tasty. I've written about these before but it's my damn blog so I can write about them again if I like. Let me remind you of the reasons I like these…

  • They taste great, whether you consume them as they come out of your microwave or you take the turkey meat and use it in some other recipe.
  • They're easy to make and you can do it without any prep. If at 7:00, you get the urge for turkey, you can be dining on one of these by 7:15. These are lifesavers when I have one of my difficult-to-plan days…which lately is every day.
  • They're healthy. Or at least healthier than anything else I'd be likely to eat if I didn't have one of these available.
  • And they're cheap…about $3.33 a pound for cooked, almost-boneless turkey. One Jennie-O Turkey Pot Roast usually weighs in around three pounds so for ten bucks, I get an awful lot of good, cheap meals. They also reheat rather well.

So is there a downside? Yes, this: They can be hard to find. I used to get mine at Costco but the ones around me have stopped carrying them. In this post and later in this post, I detailed my frantic search to stock up before my supply lines were cut off. Just when I was running out, a couple of readers of this site, starting with Dave Sikula, came to my rescue. They informed me that they're now being carried in outlets of the Fresh and Easy market chain which currently has more than 170 stores in California, Arizona and Nevada. I stopped in at one today and sure enough, there they were.

I believe some Costcos still carry them; just not around here. There are also some other market chains that sell them heated in the same place as they sell cooked rotisserie chickens. That may not be a bad way to enjoy them if you get them when they haven't been sitting out for hours, but you lose that wonderful sense of security when you have an unheated one waiting in the fridge and know you can make it whenever you like. Give one a try if they sell 'em near you.

Recommended Reading

I've been waiting to see what Fred Kaplan would have to say about the offing of Bin Laden. Here he is with an explanation on what this means for the future.

Today's Video Link

From CBS News Nightwatch for August 7, 1990: Host Robert Krulwich interviews the First Lady of Cartoon Voicing, June Foray. This clip apparently starts after she'd already demonstrated the voices of Rocky the Flying Squirrel and Natasha Fatale and perhaps a few others. The gentleman on the couch is Bill Hurtz, who was one of the best directors at Jay Ward's operation. Thanks to our pal Barry Mitchell who uploaded this to YouTube and told me about it…

VIDEO MISSING

Sunday Evening

Boy, it's nice to see America so happy. This country has been in bad need of a hug for a long time and the killing of Osama Bin Laden seems to be it, at least in some quarters. I guess I'd be a better person if I never felt joy at anyone's death…but I'm not that good and if anyone deserved it, it's Bin Laden. Part of me is also glad they didn't take him alive, thereby leading to endless arguments about how to give him a fair trial and what nation has jurisdiction, etc.

I tweeted, "I can't wait to hear Rush Limbaugh explain tomorrow how killing Bin Laden is the worst possible thing that could happen to Obama." If Rush doesn't, someone else will. My guess is most Obama foes won't dare go much farther than to minimize his role and accuse him of taking even the tiniest bow for the accomplishment of our military. I never thought it was a failing of George W. Bush that this didn't happen on his watch but if it had been President Gore who didn't catch him, the right-wing crowd would have chanted every day that the Chief Exec was a failure. That is, if they hadn't already impeached him for reading My Pet Goat or ignoring the "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in America" memo.

(In case the above isn't clear: I don't think anyone should be politicizing this kind of thing. I'm criticizing those on both sides who are sitting around tonight, trying to figure out how to use this to electoral advantage.)

The timing is fascinating. Today is eight years since Bush gave that speech with the "Mission Accomplished" banner…and I just heard Brian Williams say that May 1 was the date when the death of Hitler became official. It's also kind of funny that Obama's announcement preempted Mr. Trump's Celebrity Apprentice in some time zones.

Getting back to the elections for a second: As I keep saying here, I think it's foolish that people are trying to handicap the 2012 Presidential Election now, this far ahead of the day we go to the polls. Article after article reminds us that this far ahead of previous votes, Joe Lieberman looked like he had the inside track on the White House…or Rudy Giuliani or any number of other folks who never got too close to their party's nomination, let alone the presidency. People hear that, acknowledge the basic truth…and then turn around and say, "Yes, but Obama's only three points ahead of Mike Huckabee in Kentucky." Like that means anything right now.

These discussions always seem based on the premise that nothing can happen between now and Election Day that will change anything — no revelation, no candidate gaffe, no change in the economy, no statement in the debates, no natural disaster, no military action…nothing. And now here we are with an event that changes something. I don't know what it changes but one of the reasons those folks are dancing in flash mobs on MSNBC right now is that something has changed. Maybe it's just that a dark cloud has been lifted but that's something and it should lead to other somethings, hopefully good but maybe some bad. Right now, the mood of this country is so down that any change is likely to be good in some regard. Here's hoping we look back on 5/1/11 and regard it as a day of healing and renewal.

Sunday Afternoon

It dawned on me last night while watching the White House Correspondents Dinner that it's an evening where folks in politics get to pretend they're in show business…and folks in show business get to pretend they're in politics…and they're both right. I usually think of it as an enormous but intriguing waste of time and one of those events that suggest much of our political rhetoric is bogus. If it was earnest, some of those people should have been slapping each other instead of dining cordially in the same room.

Last night's event, at least as it appeared on C-Span, suggested something very American to me. In how many other countries could this take place? I can think of a couple but it's not a long list. I have a hunch that Muammar Muhammad al-Gaddafi doesn't annually don a tux, fraternize with the press and sit there and get roasted by a Libyan comedian. Admittedly, Seth Meyers didn't spend as long on Obama's shortcomings as he did on Donald Trump's…but Obama is actually going to be on the ballot and in a way, the remarks about him no longer being the guy America elected were a lot crueler than making fun of Trump's hair. If people are going to make fun of you, wouldn't you rather they picked on your hair than your personal integrity?

I thought Meyers' material was sharp. His delivery is a little amateurish and in a way, that helps him because he seems so innocent and non-confrontational. Later, I watched a little of Jay Leno's last appearance at one of these dinners and I was struck by the contrast. Leno "sold" his jokes better but his jokes just weren't as good. Meyers had the wisdom to open, not with jokes that put anyone in the audience on the defensive, but with lines about C-Span and the hotel and Washington parties, thereby getting them laughing at others before anyone had to laugh at themselves. It was really a very skillful performance.

A lot of websites today are reporting on how annoyed Donald Trump was at comments by Meyers and by the President. I don't think he was mad at all about them. I think he was mad at the way the rest of the audience laughed (perhaps overlaughed) at them. And not to be mentioned at all would have pissed him off even more.

Obviously, I don't know Mr. Trump. Apart from the one near-encounter I wrote about the other day, I've had only one other brush with him. One day we were in editing at Modern Videofilm on an episode of Garfield and Friends, and he and Ivana (I think) walked into our bay, hopelessly lost and late for something they were supposed to view elsewhere in the building. Even before I recognized who it was, you could feel the self-importance in the room.

But my guess on all this is that he tossed his hat into the ring (that is not a hair joke) kind of as a publicity stunt and attention-getting device…and that maybe in the last few weeks, he's had moments where he thinks, "Hey, I could actually win this thing" and maybe he's started taking it seriously. But he also has to be looking at polls now that say that a pretty large percentage of this country is starting to really hate him…and that's before he's credible enough as a candidate that the opposition's going to start really going after him. Last night, he obviously didn't enjoy insulting jokes delivered with a smile. How's he going to take to some pretty important people calling him, in all seriousness, a dangerous megalomaniac?

And how about them digging around in his past, hauling out every stupid thing he's ever said and all his many legal hassles? Is this man equipped to be a good loser? Or even a proper team player in the Republican Party? I don't think so. A lot of his income if he doesn't become President flows from people liking him, trusting him and being impressed with him. Does he want to gamble that on the slim chance he can get the nomination, let alone beat Barack Obama? I don't think so.