Today's Video Link

Here's a short video of a baby penguin. Baby penguins aren't as cute as baby pandas…but then neither are you.

Recommended Reading

Bruce Bartlett on the battle over the deficit. What does this man mean when he says we can't balance the budget and lower my taxes just by cutting foreign aid?

Saturday Morning

If you've been wondering why Michael Steele is no longer chairman of the Republican National Committee — and I don't know how that could be a question in anybody's mind — catch this week's Real Time with Bill Maher. First, you have to question the wisdom of any Conservative who even goes on Real Time with Bill Maher. Secondly, Steele didn't have a clue how to answer a pretty simple, fundamental question.

The Republican plan for Medicare is to turn it into a voucher system where seniors get a voucher for $15,000 to spend in a private insurance marketplace that doesn't like to accept high-risk cases or very old people. So what happens if $15,000 isn't sufficient, as it won't be in most cases, to cover someone's medical needs? Steele's answer was basically, "Well, we'll figure that out later."

I'm not sure what a better answer to the question would have been but there's got to be a better one than that.

I suspect that an honest one would have been that either some people will do without vital medical care and/or that the voucher amounts will be considerably raised, more than wiping out whatever this plan is supposed to save us. I wouldn't have expected Steele to say that, either…but there has to be a better answer than no answer.

On BBC Radio

Greg Ehbrar tips me off to a marathon of programs (actually, programmes) on BBC Radio about great comedians including Laurel & Hardy, Charlie Chaplin, Monty Python and Norman Wisdom. The whole thing runs 315 minutes but you can listen to — or if you know how, download — individual sections. It's online for the next week.

Today's Video Link

Got twenty minutes? You might want to spend it watching this video of a "talk" Roger Ebert recently gave, assisted by his wife and two friends, about his loss of speech. Thanks to Gordon Kent for suggesting I embed this one…

Phone Phonies

I don't like telephone solicitors. I more or less take the position that if you're calling total strangers and trying to get them to buy your product, your product is crap and you're a person or company of low ethics. I'm sure that's not always the case but it's true enough.

Lately, I've received an average of two calls a day from contractors — outfits that want to give me a free estimate on painting or repairing my home. I have no need of any such services and if I did, I have a perfectly fine contractor who could handle that for me. And if I didn't have a contractor, I'd call trusted friends (or other businessfolks who've worked for me) and get a referral. I wouldn't gamble on a company that came at me over the phone like that.

Often, the person on the phone starts this business relationship they hope to have with me by lying. They say, "We're doing a couple of jobs out there on…" and they mention the name of my street, which they obviously got from the same source that gave them my number. I say, "Really? Where on my street are you? Can I go by and talk to the neighbor for whom you're working?" And somehow, they know they're working on my street but they aren't sure where. The guy on the phone this morning said, "I don't know…my partner's handling those jobs." Uh-huh.

Or they lie about where they got my number. I ask and they come back with "Uh, one of your neighbors told us you needed some work done." No, none of my neighbors told them that. They bought a list from a company…and some of the solicitors sound kinda pissed at that company when I inform them that (a) I have never been in need of their services and (b) if I were, I would have picked one of the thirty or forty contractors who bought the same list and has already called me.

The most honest of these calls I've received was from a woman who phoned about a week ago. I shall now attempt to replicate the text of that call, starting with the moment when she answered my question about where she got my number…

HER: This company I work for gave it to me. They give me these lists and I make calls and try to get business for them.

ME: Do you have any connection to this contractor you're trying to get me to hire?

HER: None at all. The people I work for also have me calling for some health club I've never heard of and for a company that sells office supplies. Do you need either of those?

ME: Nope. How many calls a week do you make?

HER: Hundreds. I've been doing it for about four weeks. I work out of my house. They e-mail me these lists and a little speech to give and I have about a dozen replies here to questions people are likely to ask, and if I make a sale, I get a commission. The ad I answered said I could make a thousand dollars a week but so far…

ME: Not working out, huh?

HER: Well, I found five or six people who are taking a free trial offer for the gym. No one yet for the contractor or the office supply place. But I don't get my commission on the people who get the free trial unless they go beyond that and pay money to sign up. If they all do, I might make about a hundred bucks.

ME: Maybe you ought to spend your days making hundreds of calls trying to find a real job.

HER: I did. The best I could do was this.

I also spoke to some solicitors who could tell me (and were willing to tell me) where they got my number. They all said it was through a company called DataQuick and they gave me an 800 number to call and be removed from that firm's database. I called the number and got a recorded announcement that said, "Your call cannot be answered at this time. Please call again." Isn't that handy?

The other day, someone who wants to be my contractor called…and I think this was actually a guy who paints and pounds nails himself, not someone working on commission. He was very unhappy when I told him I was not a possible customer and that so many others had phoned before him. He told me he got my number from DataQuick and he gave me a different number to call for removal. It turned out to be the company's main number in San Diego. I called it and one of the options offered by their robotic receptionist was to press 3 and be connected to their Consumer Privacy Hotline. I pressed three and heard a familiar recorded voice tell me, "Your call cannot be answered at this time. Please call again."

I called back and chose to speak to a sales representative for DataQuick. I got a fellow who checked and swore my name was not in their database and they had not sold it to anyone. A portion of that call went like this…

ME: Gee, why do you think four or five different contractors told me they got my number from your company? Were they all lying to me?

HIM: They had to be. Phone solicitors do that all the time. I'll tell you, I've gotten calls at home from solicitors who tell me they got my number from DataQuick and I tell them, "No, you didn't. I work for DataQuick and I know my number is not in our database."

The fellow gave me the number to call and complain to the "Do Not Call" registry (with which I have long been listed) but all I can do with that is complain about individual contractors. None of them are calling a second time…and I kinda feel like they're victims in this, as well. There's no option to complain about DataQuick, which I assume will swear I'm not in their database. In any case, it sounds like one of those long, frustrating situations where you wind up deciding that the cure is more trouble than the disease. With some problems, all you can do is bitch about it on your blog.

Briefly Noted…

A person whose identity is unknown to me posted this report on the "Writing for Animation" panel I moderated at WonderCon.

Today's Video Link

A few years ago, the Frontier Hotel in Las Vegas went away…largely unmourned, I suspect. There was a lot of history there but long ago and far away. The building — the first hotel I stayed in in Vegas, by the way — had gotten pretty grungy even before the big labor strike there that lasted six years, four months, and 10 days.

For a long time, everyone knew it would soon be imploded. The questions were When? and What would replace it? The first question was answered when it went kaboom in November of 2007. The second question is still to be answered. New resorts are announced for the property every year or so but funding is tight and lots of plans are falling through. Here's a nice little video about the implosion…

VIDEO MISSING

Cheap Seinfeld

The complete Seinfeld on DVD usually sells for $250. For the next day or two, Amazon has it for under a hundred bucks. That's 32 DVDs with all 180 episodes plus a ton of special features and a book. Order now by clicking on the last word of this sentence.

Arthur Marx, R.I.P.

Arthur Marx (L) with his friend Frank Ferrante
Arthur Marx (L) with his friend Frank Ferrante

Arthur Marx was a champion tennis player, a journalist who wrote many books and articles about Hollywood, an accomplished playwright and a successful comedy writer. Oh, and he was also the son of Groucho Marx.

Whenever I got to talk with Arthur — which didn't happen as often as I would have liked — I always felt I had to make clear to him that I knew and respected his work, and that I wasn't just chatting with him because of his family tree. One time when the subject came up, he remarked that he was fortunate that he'd won all those awards for tennis when he was younger. It helped his self-esteem to have had a success that was all his own, that in no way could be credited to whose son he was.

At times, he looked like his father, sounded like his father and gave you the sense that sarcasm was hereditary. In some of his many books, he shared the benefits and problems of being the offspring not only of such a famous and revered man but also one who could be cold and acerbic, even towards his own kid. His first Marx-themed book, Life With Groucho, was an altogether flattering, loving look at his old man…but his old man objected to a couple of minor points and threatened to sue his son over them. No suit was ever filed but that's what happens when you have a father named Groucho.

Another downside is that people tend to assume you have the exact same skill set as your parent. Arthur did most of his screen and stage writing with a partner named Bob Fisher and reviewing one of their plays, a critic once assumed that all the weak jokes must have been written by Fisher because they could not possibly have been written by the son of Groucho. (In reponse, Arthur noted that the critic was almost surely comparing his and Fisher's work to Marx Brothers movie scripts written not by Groucho but by famous humorists like George S. Kaufman and S.J. Perelman.)

He had an odd relationship with Marx Brothers fans. He tried to accommodate the many questions and all the interest but he also wanted to protect the family name and a certain level of privacy. And while he knew an awful lot about the Brothers' careers and almost everything about their lives, he occasionally got a question he could not answer and had to turn to folks like me for answers. One time when he called me, I don't recall the question he asked but the answer was "Al Boasberg."

I took the above photo at an event in October of '09 at which U.S. postage stamps were unveiled of great TV icons. There was, of course, one of Groucho so Arthur was grumbling, mainly for comic effect, that he had to pay full price for a stamp with his father on it and they wouldn't give him a discount. I reminded him that unless and until they put out a series on Great Tax Collectors, I can't buy a stamp with my father on it at all. He chuckled, pointed at a large blowup image of the stamp which also included a photo of the duck from You Bet Your Life and said, "I shouldn't complain. They probably made the duck's kid pay double."

Recommended Reading

Matt Taibbi tackles the vast amounts of government "welfare" (i.e., cash dispersal) that goes to very, very wealthy people. This is one of those issues that should have Tea Parties outraged….that is, if they really object to their government spending so much money foolishly. But they don't care about this kind of waste. In this follow-up, Taibbi discusses a little about why they don't care.

Recommended Reading

Glenn Greenwald has an interesting take on why Barack Obama seems to be giving in to Republican demands so readily. The more I think about it, the more sense Greenwald's interpretation makes to me.

Today's Video Link

Hey, what's on The Learning Channel this week?