Today's Video Link

From October of 1972, it's Johnny Carson's tenth anniversary special. I wonder, if you'd offered that evening to bet Johnny he would do the show until May 22 of 1992, what kind of odds he'd have given you.

The audio on this material is not good but the guest list is impossible to ignore. I remember that when it was originally advertised, the names of Dean Martin and Jerry Lewis were casually mentioned in the lineup and some people got excited, thinking it was a reunion of Martin and Lewis. They must have been disappointed that Dean was only in a pre-taped introduction…which was the only way they could have the two of them both "on" the show. If they'd been together in the studio, the event would have been about them instead of being about Johnny.

I also remember hearing — and I can't remember where — that Johnny hated this format, which is why they never did it again. He didn't like not having his desk and he didn't like having the guests all out there at once, placed in locations where it felt unnatural for him to talk to them and them to talk to each other. It was a lovely set but it's obvious the NBC crew hadn't quite figured out how to shoot it. Note that when you first see the layout, there's an awkward shot of the boom mike and there's a stagehand running through the shot.

This runs about 50 minutes and gets a little tedious around the time Rowan and Martin come out, if not before. It's in five parts which should play one after another in the player I've embedded below…

VIDEO MISSING

Broadway Beat

Drew Grant finds some good words for Spider-Man: Turn Off the Dark. Ousting Julie Taymor and postponing again for rewrites don't seem to have driven folks away from the box office. Last week, the show was at 96.9% capacity. Then again, maybe most of those tickets were purchased before the shake-up.

We are hearing naught but raves for the new musical from the folks who brought us South Park. It's called The Book of Mormon and everyone I know who's seen it says it will run forever and deserves to.

The Incredible Disappearing Theater

My longtime pal Craig Miller, who also grew up in this area, notes that Google Maps also shows the Carthay Circle Theater (or "Theatre," as they spell it) still situated where it used to be. In fact, I note the Wunderground map I saw apparently is the Google Map.

Where it gets even curiouser is when you zoom in and out on the Google Map. At a distance, it shows the Carthay Circle where it was pre-1969. As you get closer, the theater disappears and is no longer on the map. You should be able to do this on the inset map below…

A couple of my correspondents have already suggested one thought. Map-makers sometimes include phony names and places on maps in order to identify when someone plagiarizes their work. Maybe someone left the Carthay Circle Theater on a map deliberately just to see if someone else would pick up on the error…not that it would be actionable but it may have been left in as an identifier.

Recommended Reading

Read Steve Kornacki's piece about why Donald Trump is not a serious candidate for the presidency. Kornacki not only believes this, he's willing to stake the entire contents of his savings account. I think his money's safe.

Years ago, a friend in the campaign business explained to me how lucrative it had been for Pat Buchanan to run for president the two or three times he did it. Buchanan did not get a single electoral vote and I don't see that his candidacy impacted legislation or the direction of this country in any way. But he apparently pocketed, via legal means, an awful lot of money that was donated to his cause, raised his speaking fees, sold more books, got jobs in broadcasting and so forth…all because he not only ran but had just enough credibility that the press took him seriously. You or I couldn't do it and he couldn't do it again…but back then, he was positioned for it, much as Sarah Palin is now.

Circle in the Square

carthay

Yesterday, I was checking the weather — we've been having weather lately in Los Angeles for a change — and I noticed something odd on a map over at Wunderground, which is my weather source of choice. This is a hunk of a map they have that includes my area and as you can see, they note certain areas and landmarks…like the Beverly Center and the Pan Pacific Park. Prominently noted there also is the Carthay Circle Theater and it struck me as odd for two reasons that someone would select that, of all the identifiers they could select…

  1. True, there's a lot of history associated with the Carthay Circle. It was built in 1926 and housed a number of important movies. Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs had its world premiere at the Carthay Circle Theatre on December 21, 1937 and it was at one point regarded as one of the great architectural achievements of Southern California. But there are a lot of theaters in Los Angeles and most of them had some great premiere or presentation…why single out the Carthay Circle? And there's another reason it's odd that it's on this map…
  2. It isn't there anymore. It was torn down in 1969.

There is no Carthay Circle Theater…there. There's a small replica at Disney World in Florida but the one the map is pinpointing is long gone. There's an office building where it used to be. As I wrote back here, my parents took me there maybe a half-dozen times in the sixties. I have a vague memory that we saw Around the World in Eighty Days there not when it first premiered at the Carthay Circle — in '56 when I was four years old — but a few years later in some kind of return engagement. I think we also saw West Side Story there…and others I cannot identify.

carthaycircletheater

It was a great place but I'm curious why it's still a landmark, four decades after it stopped being there. I guess it has something to do with cartographers constantly taking information off old maps as they make new ones…and sometimes, something doesn't get updated. Or maybe there's some mapmaker who always loved the place. He first kissed a girl in the balcony (I think the place had a balcony) or while sitting alone in the loge, he first fell in love with Hayley Mills. I think that's where I did.

They took a wrecking ball to his beloved movie shrine but they cannot erase it from his heart and memory. So every time he whips up a map of that area, he puts it in. It's his way of screaming to the world, "No! You will not deny what I know in my heart! You say there is no more Carthay Circle Theater! I say there is and there shall forever be!"

Or something like that. The thing is, it probably doesn't still exist only on this map on the weather site. They didn't design this map. They got it from somewhere and as you can see, it does have Pan Pacific Park and the Beverly Center, both of which were built in the eighties. So it's a map someone was maintaining and using and it wouldn't surprise me if there are others that have the Carthay Circle Theater on them.

Almost all the restaurant guides and address search engines like Yelp! and Superpages still list a restaurant called Andre's of Beverly Hills at 8635 Wilshire Blvd. in Beverly Hills despite the fact that it went out of business in the late seventies. 8635 Wilshire is not far from where the Carthay Circle Theater was. A lot of people probably used to dine at Andre's and then go catch a movie at the Carthay Circle. Apparently, in some database somewhere, they still can.

Today's Video Link

I linked to a poor quality video of this a few years ago but someone has uploaded a much better copy to YouTube so I'm a'gonna link again. These are three commercials for Bosco Chocolate Syrup, a concoction that my friend Johanna, back when I was eight, used to drink right out of the jar without bothering to mix it into milk. Last I heard, Johanna was just coming down from the sugar rush.

The little rabbit in all three was voiced by a man I discuss here often, the late Daws Butler…and Daws may have had a hand in the writing of these, as well. I recall they were among his favorites of the nineteen million commercials he did during his wonderful career. As I mentioned the first time I featured these (and as the fellow who put the better copies on YouTube notes), the rabbit with the deep voice is not, as one might think upon first listen, Thurl Ravenscroft. Sounds a lot like him but isn't. I don't know who it is…most likely some studio singer whose name I never heard. The other rabbit's voice is, maddeningly, done by someone I probably do know but cannot place.

Daws liked these a lot. I like these a lot. I'll bet you like these a lot…

VIDEO MISSING

Housekeeping

Last night, I accidentally posted the wrong message here. Instead of posting a new one I'd intended, I put up another copy of one I'd posted a month ago. This is what is technically known in Internet Parlance as a "mistake." Say it with me: "Mistake."

I have deleted the first appearance of the message in question. My thanks to the dozens of you who wrote to tell me and to ask if I was going into reruns here. No, I only reuse old stuff for paying work.

From the E-Mailbag…

Jody Bernstein writes…

Love the blog but I'm curious about the time stamps and the life of a writer. I often see you post messages that say 4:30 in the morning on them. Are those sent by a timer or does it mean you were really up and blogging at that hour? How many hours a night do you sleep? Do you really write all night? How can you do that?

Sometimes, I really write all night. I get a lot of calls during the day and while my brain can sometimes shift and back and forth, it isn't always possible to keep jumping from script to phone call then back to script then to another phone call and so on. Nighttime, I can write for long stretches without having my attention jerked away from a story every ten minutes.

Years ago, I slept eight hours a night. Then I was diagnosed with Sleep Apnea and I started sleeping with a CPAP unit. I began sleeping six hours a night and getting up more refreshed than when I'd slept eight without the machine. Since I lost all that weight a few years ago, I'm usually fine with five and I sometimes get by with four…though when I go a couple of nights on four hours sleep, I pay for it one way or another. In any case, I'm up and at the computer when the time stamp on a message says I'm here…

…and usually not unhappy to be here. I love writing. Always have. I don't like every assignment but in the main, this is something I enjoy very much and that's the answer to your "How can you do that?" question. I got into a line of work I liked doing…which of course makes it never feel like work. If I drove a cab, that would be work and then I'd go home and write all night for pleasure. I don't make any real money writing this blog but you can see how much writing I do for it.

The number one piece of advice I give to aspiring writers or anyone considering the profession is to either enjoy doing it or go find something else to do that you do enjoy. When I'm with another writer and he or she starts bemoaning the hours and effort they have to put in…well, I guess it's justified if you were trapped into working for rotten money on something. Or on something you really, really don't want to write. Both have happened to me on occasion. But I always remind them that at its worst, it's still not a bad way to live…at least for those of us who never thought of doing anything else.

Basil Metabolism

fawltytowers01

A lot of folks have quoted (or stolen) my line about the whole premise of home video is for the industry to see how many times they can get me to buy Goldfinger. I haven't done an actual tally but I suspect the number of times it's been reissued in new formats or deluxe editions is nothing compared to the marketing of Fawlty Towers collections.

A collection of that wonderful sitcom shouldn't be that big a deal. I mean, there were only the twelve episodes, eight or nine of which are among the funniest TV shows ever produced. Anyway, Amazon has a nice sale going on the latest release, which is remastered and chock-full of special features and done so well, it will lull you into a false sense of security. Buy it and you'll think you'll never have to purchase another set of Fawlty Towers episodes ever again…you poor, deluded ninny. This one however should last you for a long time…weeks, perhaps.

Here's the link. It's currently $23.99 and since you get free shipping if your purchases total $25 or more, you'll probably want to buy something else at the same time. Knowing you, you can find something.

Recommended Reading

I'm not watching the situation in Libya very closely. Fortunately, Fred Kaplan is.

Dead End

You know how on the Internet, you sometimes find yourself on a page that says "The page you're looking for could not be found"? Well, this is the best one of those I've seen.

Recommended Reading

As Kevin Drum notes, headlines that say 59% of Americans oppose "Obamacare" are misleading. They make you think 59% want it repealed…but that 59% includes a lot of people who want to see it made stronger, like turned into Single Payer. By a modest majority, folks in this country like the Affordable Care Law.

Elizabeth Taylor, R.I.P.

elizabethtaylor01

Nope, no anecdotes about her. Never met her. Never had any particular feeling, one way or the other about her as an actress. That's not necessarily a bad thing.

Sadly, what I think of when the name Elizabeth Taylor comes up is not any particular screen performance but the jokes: Jokes about her many marriages. Jokes about her diamonds. And after a certain point — I think when Joan Rivers decided there was money in them — jokes about her weight. When you're a celebrity, people do jokes about your failings or negatives and I admit to having written a number of them, though I don't think any about her.

But there sometimes comes a point where the jokes cross a line — in sheer volume if not insensitivity and content, and start to feel more like stomping on someone when they're vulnerable…and forgetting that that's an actual human being you're talking about. I thought a lot of the jokes about Ms. Taylor's girth or her marital exploits often went way beyond what was funny. A lot of Johnny Carson's longevity and general esteem came from his awareness of where the line was and when not to cross it. Like her friend Michael Jackson, there were times when she seemed to be an easy punch line and nothing else…and that was sad. In both cases.

Second Greatest

One performer of many who always interested me is/was the late Dick Shawn. Shawn was in two of my favorite movies — It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World and The Producers — and almost starred in the original Broadway production of one of my favorite musicals, Li'l Abner. He was actually cast in the role of Abner, not because the show's creators thought he was ideal for the part but because they were set to start rehearsals and they couldn't find anyone who was. Then they found Peter Palmer. A not-dissimilar attitude seems to have accompanied his hiring for Mad World. Because of its size, the role of Sylvester Marcus should have been played by a major, established comedian…which Shawn was not at the time. He was nowhere near big enough to share a screen and billing with Sid Caesar, Milton Berle and Phil Silvers. Fortunately for Shawn, neither was anyone else who was the right age, a bit muscular and convincing when playing a maniac. So he got the job and in this case, they didn't find anyone preferable.

Even his participation in The Producers is a bit odd. He played a hippie named L.S.D. who was essential to the plot of the film but easily and effectively jettisoned later for the musical version. "The character never quite fit in," writer-director Mel Brooks said when asked about the deletion…and I get the feeling that Dick Shawn, in shaping that character, contributed mightily to that disconnect. Mel was right: L.S.D. doesn't really blend seamlessly with the rest of his wonderful movie. It almost feels like he was filmed for some other picture and then edited into this one. That may in part be because there isn't one shot where you see Shawn in the same frame with the stars, Zero Mostel and Gene Wilder. I once asked Brooks if he was even on the set at the same time as the two leads and he said "Sure" and seemed surprised when I mentioned that you never see them together. You don't. I don't think I've ever even seen a still of Shawn with either of them.

Since Shawn died spontaneously in 1987, he's probably been best-remembered for how he died. It happened on stage during a performance of a one-man show he wrote for himself called The Second Greatest Entertainer in the Whole Wide World. As I'll explain in a moment, the vehicle was just the kind of thing that might have ended with the star faking his death on-stage and indeed, many audience members that night left wondering if they actually had seen Dick Shawn drop dead or if it was all an elaborate, unfunny joke. Andy Kaufman was probably very jealous.

All of that upstages something that is too often unsaid about that show. At least when I saw it (twice) and its star didn't croak, it was truly one of the most brilliant, memorable evenings you could ever spend in a theater. It was the kind of show you cheered and gave a couple of rousing standing ovations, then went outside and gasped for air, aware you'd witnessed something you'd never forget.

My first was in 1978, I believe, at what was then called the Solari Theater. A well-respected acting teacher named Rudy Solari had taken over a theater in Beverly Hills and renamed it, he said, in memory of his father. I recall he took a fair amount of criticism for that…people feeling he'd named it to honor himself and was using the old man as a shield. He didn't deserve any such grief because he ran a fine operation which took in a lot of wonderful, often-experimental shows and gave them a place to live — and not in some converted welding shop in a bad neighborhood but in a wonderful, comfortable room in a classy area.

When we arrived that night, the house was closed and the audience was all crammed into the lobby, waiting awkwardly to be let into the theater. We finally were, just minutes before showtime and we would soon learn the reason for the delay, which I guess occurred at every performance.

There was no curtain. The stage was a replica of a seedy apartment — a flophouse wherein a derelict with a few bucks might dwell — and the floor was covered with hundreds of pieces of crumpled newspaper. We did not know that Dick Shawn was under all that newspaper and the delay in seating us was to minimize the amount of time he would have to be there.

The show began with a recording of a female chorus singing a little song called "Hail to the Audience." They then played it again. And again. And I think again. At some point, Shawn emerged from under the debris. He'd been on stage all that time and would not leave it until the conclusion of the show.

He then began a stream of consciousness monologue/rant about his life. He was playing a drunk, has-been/never-was entertainer whose life was in ruins because his genius had never been recognized. Everything he did was either over the heads of the audience or under their crotches — too high or too low, never just right. Had that ever been said about Dick Shawn? I'll bet it had. The topics covered ran the field…some about show business; others about life and relationships and how so little in the world made sense to him. It was, probably deliberately, hard to tell if it was Dick Shawn or the character talking…or if either one of them utterly craved or totally rejected our sympathy.

I don't know if this show was ever properly videotaped or otherwise recorded. I hope it was, not only because I'd love to see it again but because there's no way anyone could adequately explain it to anyone who didn't see it. I'm not even sure you could explain it to someone who did see it and I'm not the only one who felt that way. Charles Champlin, the roving critic of the L.A. Times wrote…

What Shawn did was not easy to describe. It was a seemingly free-associative skein of bits, thoughts and actions. It was a comedy about comedy, a performance about performance and the performer's peculiar relationship with his audiences. And it was, finally, a kind of acted-out speculation on the reality of the absurd and the absurdity of much of what we think of as reality.

See? He couldn't tell you, either.

Act One ended with Shawn (or maybe his alter-ego) collapsing on the floor…and during intermission, that's where he remained. He was just lying there while the crew cleared the stage around him of all that crumpled newspaper. I think the premise was that the character was stricken with a heart attack or something of the sort, and that Act Two was all a fantasy that raced through his mind in its final minutes. What I know for sure is that in the second half, we saw the character's fully-realized nightclub-type act and I also know that the transition to it was one of the most stunning, I-can't-believe-he-just-did-that moments I ever witnessed in a theater.

Okay now, picture this. The stage still looked like a crappy apartment. Dick Shawn was lying on the floor in shabby clothes. The whole visual screamed failure, failure, failure. Then suddenly there was recorded music (all the music in the show, and there was a lot of it, was on tape) and there was a timpani drum roll as the Big Star was introduced…

…and then the stage went black…

…and then, after what seemed like only three or so seconds, the lights came back in full-force and everything was different. Dick Shawn was on his feet wearing a glittery tux, singing into a microphone and looking for all the world like a stellar Vegas headliner. The filthy apartment was gone and all around were curtains and sequins and sparkles, and behind him was a full orchestra — of mannequins, similarly attired.

All of us in the audience had a brief moment of whiplash. It even surprised me the second time I saw it when I knew what was coming. A friend of mine described it as the best example he'd ever seen of live theater achieving an impact you could never in a million years replicate on movies or television. In film, professorial folks sometimes speak of something called a "smash cut," in which you leap from one locale or action to another in a manner that is so jarring that you are conscious of the editing, utterly aware they just went from something shot in one place at one time to something shot somewhere else at another time. Dick Shawn did a "smash cut" live before our eyes.

He then performed the entertainer's act — Mr. Fabulously Fantastic Jr., singing and dancing and juggling oranges and expanding on topics covered in the first act. It probably lasted thirty to forty minutes and you simply could not take your eyes off that incredible person up there with so much energy and so much unpredictability. There was never a moment when you knew what he was going to do next. He must have in some way because of the intricate light and music cues but he never let you think you knew where he was heading. I gather the stage crew was aware he would hit certain marks and give certain cues but only he knew, and I'll bet it changed from night to night, how he was going to get to them and in what order.

At the end of Mr. Fantastic Jr.'s performance, there was some sort of audio explosion and he collapsed again. You blinked and he was somehow back in the bad apartment with crumpled newspaper raining down on him from above. There were also bananas on wires dangling over the audience. (Bananas were a recurring theme throughout the show as some sort of link between apes and comedians.) I do not recall how he closed after that but I remember endless standing ovations, and Shawn coming fully out of character to give a long post-show speech, mainly introducing friends of his in the audience. The second time I went, my friend Bridget and I were seated next to Merv Griffin and Eva Gabor. Introducing Merv turned into a hilarious ten-minute conversation between the two men, utterly unplanned and as funny, at least on Shawn's end, as the play that had preceded it.

That second time was in 1985 in the same building, which was now the Canon Theater — named not after anyone's father but after the street on which it was located. Shawn's first stay had been a short-run tryout. A full seven years later, he brought it back for what turned out to be a long, smash run. I'll bet a lot of those who rushed to buy tickets were, like me, folks who'd seen it the first time and were eager to see it again and to treat a friend to the same experience. Bridget raved about it for years after and thanked me not only for taking her but for not telling her anything in advance about what we were going to see.

It was two years later that Shawn passed away during a performance of Second Greatest Entertainer in San Diego. I have read or heard several different accounts but they all say that he collapsed on stage, apparently at the end of Act One where the script called for him to collapse…and then he just plain never got up.

After the intermission, he continued to lie there and the audience, which had returned to its seats, eventually began to giggle. After a longer while, the stage crew began to realize the pause was running much, much longer than it ever had. Defying Shawn's instructions to never interfere no matter what occurred on stage, someone went out to check on the star (some reports say it was his son) and the audience thought it was part of the script. When he asked for a doctor, they thought that was part of the show, too. And when an ambulance was called and the audience was asked to leave, some of the playgoers still thought that was all part of the show, as well. Forty-five minutes later in a nearby hospital, Dick Shawn was pronounced dead from a heart attack at the age of 63. Maybe then they all believed it was true.

Boy, I wish you could have seen this show…and never mind you. I wish I could see it again. More than a quarter-century later, I still think about it.