Recommended Reading

There are those who think allowing Gay Marriage harms the "traditional" kind. I've never quite understood the argument that one has much to do with the other and generally, when those who oppose same-sex weddings are asked to explain this, they double-talk and dodge the question.

In any case, statistician Nate Silver has assembled some interesting data that suggests the opposite of this view may be valid. States that are friendly to the idea of two guys or two gals getting hitched seem to have lower divorce rates. Maybe we're in for a raft of commercials that say, "Save Traditional Marriage. Legalize the Gay kind!"

Yoops!

I made a typo that's so funny, I've decided to leave it up. I referred here to "John Woo" as the attorney who wrote the memos on which the Bush Adminstration hung most of their arguments that torture was legal. No, you idiot. That was John Yoo. John Woo is a noted film director. And I'll bet I'm not the first person to make that mistake.

Conan the Defiant

conanobrien02

I was in a recording studio today working when someone came in and said Conan O'Brien has declared war on NBC, releasing a statement saying that he would not under any circumstances do The Tonight Show at 12:05 following The Jay Leno Show. Most of the news stories are saying that, as well. But when I read the statement, I found it to be somewhat less harsh than the headlines are making it out to be. I know you've probably read it elsewhere but here it is again, just for convenience…

People of Earth:

In the last few days, I've been getting a lot of sympathy calls, and I want to start by making it clear that no one should waste a second feeling sorry for me. For 17 years, I've been getting paid to do what I love most and, in a world with real problems, I've been absurdly lucky. That said, I've been suddenly put in a very public predicament and my bosses are demanding an immediate decision.

Six years ago, I signed a contract with NBC to take over "The Tonight Show" in June of 2009. Like a lot of us, I grew up watching Johnny Carson every night and the chance to one day sit in that chair has meant everything to me. I worked long and hard to get that opportunity, passed up far more lucrative offers, and since 2004, I have spent literally hundreds of hours thinking of ways to extend the franchise long into the future. It was my mistaken belief that, like my predecessor, I would have the benefit of some time and, just as important, some degree of ratings support from the prime-time schedule. Building a lasting audience at 11:30 is impossible without both.

But sadly, we were never given that chance. After only seven months, with my "Tonight Show" in its infancy, NBC has decided to react to their terrible difficulties in prime time by making a change in their long-established late night schedule.

Last Thursday, NBC executives told me they intended to move the "Tonight Show" to 12:05 to accommodate the "Jay Leno Show" at 11:35. For 60 years, the "Tonight Show" has aired immediately following the late local news. I sincerely believe that delaying the "Tonight Show" into the next day to accommodate another comedy program will seriously damage what I consider to be the greatest franchise in the history of broadcasting. The "Tonight Show" at 12:05 simply isn't the "Tonight Show." Also, if I accept this move I will be knocking the "Late Night" show, which I inherited from David Letterman and passed on to Jimmy Fallon, out of its long-held time slot. That would hurt the other NBC franchise that I love, and it would be unfair to Jimmy.

So it has come to this: I cannot express in words how much I enjoy hosting this program and what an enormous personal disappointment it is for me to consider losing it. My staff and I have worked unbelievably hard, and we are very proud of our contribution to the legacy of "The Tonight Show." But I cannot participate in what I honestly believe is its destruction. Some people will make the argument that with DVRs and the Internet, a time slot doesn't matter. But with the "Tonight Show," I believe nothing could matter more.

There has been speculation about my going to another network but, to set the record straight, I currently have no other offer and honestly have no idea what happens next. My hope is that NBC and I can resolve this quickly so that my staff, crew, and I can do a show we can be proud of, for a company that values our work.

Have a great day and, for the record, I am truly sorry about my hair; it's always been that way.

Yours,
Conan

The part about Jimmy Fallon strikes me as if not disingenuous then a bit off-mark. Fallon's show isn't doing all that well and a shake-up with regard to what comes before him might just be his best shot at survival. Even if NBC decided to leave Conan at 11:35, they could still decide to replace Fallon with something more promising.

But the rest of Conan's statement probably left NBC wondering how much is sincere and how much is an attempt to gain negotiating leverage. Meetings 'twixt NBC execs and Conan's reps are said to be going on at this very moment…and if Conan's folks walked in the door and said, "Conan either stays at 11:35 or he walks," well, that might be a very short meeting.

I'm still skeptical of how O'Brien would do at 11 PM on Fox, especially since that would put him up against The Daily Show and The Colbert Report in most markets. They wouldn't beat him since he'd have better clearances but they might shave off a lot of viewers in his favored demographic. I like Conan but I don't see another place on the schedule of any major network where I'd bet money on his success. One online article I read wondered if ABC would dump Nightline and move Jimmy Kimmel later to make room for O'Brien. Dump the number one show in that time slot in favor of the guy finishing in third place? Even with Conan's "younger viewer" advantage, that doesn't sound likely to me.

So there's a lot that's unknown here. But one thing I can say for sure: Tonight's monologues are going to be interesting. I think I'm most looking forward to Craig Ferguson's. He's the one guy in this whole job description who looks reasonably secure.

Jack in the Back?

Click above to enlarge.

Above is a frame grab from the movie, Casablanca. It's 32 minutes and 9 seconds into the film and Joan Benny, daughter of Jack Benny, thinks that's her father. No, not the black guy. The waiter in the background.

You can click on the above image and see it larger but it probably won't help you decide. Ms. Benny is basing her identification on watching the video and she thinks that man in the waiter's outfit looks like her father and more importantly, has her father's walk. In the movie, there are a few other shots of that waiter in the background.

So is that him? Well, an i.d. from the guy's daughter is not to be dismissed lightly…and it does coincide with that article I quoted in this posting, which says that Jack Benny donned a white waiter's jacket and walked around in the background of a scene. Here's another shot of the same person. This one is from 31 minutes and 48 seconds into the film and it can also be enlarged…

casablanca3148new
Click above to enlarge.

So I'll ask again: Is that him? I don't have a copy of the movie here and am unable to study the walk. Therefore, I've decided not to have an opinion on this. Looking at the photo alone, I think my view would be, "I don't think that's him but it might be." When you add in that newspaper article and the fact that Joan Benny thinks it's her dad, I'm leaning a bit in that direction…but I dunno. If Jack Benny really was in Casablanca, don't you think he'd have mentioned it somewhere?

I've decided to pass the buck to you, the wise and informed visitors who find their way here to newsfromme.com. Below is a poll and you don't have to rush to cast your ballot because I'm not going to cut off voting. You can vote next week or the week after if you want to wait 'til you have a chance to run your DVD of Casablanca. I think this thing is configured to only let you vote once from any given computer IP address so once you vote, you're stuck with your decision.

Thanks to my friend Anthony Tollin, who thought to take this question straight to Joan Benny. And thanks to Tom Roberts who produced these screen grabs.

Tortured Logic

Jon Stewart had a bizarre, frustrating interview last night with John Woo, the attorney who wrote the memos on which the Bush Adminstration hung most of their arguments that torture was legal. As is almost always the case with the most interesting Daily Show interviews, the chat ran long and they edited it for broadcast and said the whole interview would be on their website. It's not there now but may be by the time you read this.

Woo is out spinning his role as he sells his new book. I'm curious to see if he'll come across as clueless in the whole interview as he does in the edited one. I'm also curious to see if there's a moment when Jon Stewart reaches across the desk and slaps the guy upside the head.

Today's Video Link

You may have seen this before. It's a "blooper reel" for The Mary Tyler Moore Show and I thought I'd embed it here and tell you two things about it. One is that you'll get a glimpse of two fine comedy writers who died too young. You'll see David Lloyd introduce Stan Daniels for a stirring rendition of "Old Man River."

The other thing is that throughout the reel, you'll see them cut to Ted Knight, Gavin MacLeod and Ed Asner singing a song parody about Mary Tyler Moore. Want to know where that song came from? It came from MAD magazine. My favorite writer of funny verse and silly lyrics, Frank Jacobs, wrote it for an issue of MAD and several of the stars The Mary Tyler Moore Show decided to serenade her with it on the set. Have a look…

VIDEO MISSING

Tricky Dick

Richard Nixon didn't like Johnny Carson, Merv Griffin and Mike Douglas…but he saw value in inviting them to the White House.

Go Read It!

Comedian Paul Reiser tries to explain the Leno situation with NBC to a nine-year-old child…and of course, fails.

The Sound of the Big W

I've been embedding videos here from stage productions written and directed by my pal, Bruce Kimmel. Bruce does a lot of things and one is that he operates Kritzerland, which is a company that issues CDs of show tunes and movie music. Many of their releases are limited-edition resurrections of great film scores and they're all great and well-produced. I'm sure that's the case with one he just announced — the soundtrack for It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World. It's been issued before but Bruce has gone back to the original masters and found a few things that weren't on earlier issues…and if you want it, order it now because he's only pressing a thousand of 'em. These have a tendency to sell out quickly at twenty bucks and then if you want them, you have to pay many times that on eBay. Here's a link to the page and while you're there, shop around. I'm sure you'll find some other CD you want…and it may well be one of those that's sold out.

And I haven't forgotten that I've promised some new info here about the actual running times of the various cuts of It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World. Just been too busy to get to it. It will happen.

Art Attributions

Recently here, like in this post, I wrote about how comic historians and dealers in original art have a little blind spot when it comes to identifying unsigned art from Dell and Gold Key comic books of the past. If they don't know better, they usually attribute artwork to Pete Alvarado, a lovely and prolific man who drew tons of comics for Western Publishing, the company that assembled those comics. But like I said, Pete didn't draw everything. There were other artists.

It has been called to my attention that a few years ago, Heritage Auctions — the largest firm of its kind — auctioned off a number of pieces which they said were drawn by "Del Connell (attributed)". These pieces are still available for viewing in their online listings and…well, I dunno who attributed them to Del but they were wrong.

Del was a prolific writer-editor for Western Publishing from about 1951 until the firm stopped producing comics around 1984. He was my editor there for a time…a very nice, creative gentleman who wrote more comic book stories than most human beings have ever read. He drew a little for the purposes of art corrections and such but I'm not sure he ever drew an actual story or cover for publication. The pieces they attribute to him were actually drawn by several different artists including John Carey, Tony Strobl and John Langton. The above panel is from a Yosemite Sam comic there that was actually drawn by…yes, Pete Alvarado.

Heritage Auctions is a respectable outfit and I'm sure its staff did what it could to ascertain the proper credits. (I also suspect that they got these pieces from Del or someone close to him and may have been told they were Del's handiwork.) The problem is that there hasn't been much scholarship in this area and there's really no place you can look it up and check. To Heritage's credit, they put in that "attributed," which is all an identifier can really do in such circumstances and in the past when I've pointed these things out, they're really good about correcting bad info. I just mention it here because I want everyone to realize that an awful lot of the art identifications on this stuff are off…and most who err do not even have the decency to hedge their bets and say, "attributed."

Schmock! Schmock!

About 24 hours ago here, I linked you all to a video of Steve Allen laughing his fool head off in skit. Here's some more information on it.

Mike Hylton writes to inform me that it's from The Steve Allen Show for March 16, 1958. This would be his Sunday night show, the one opposite Ed Sullivan. He was playing a recurring character, sportscaster Bill Allen.

And Barry Mitchell sends me the following, excerpted from the book, Inventing Late Night by Ben Alba…

Before the show, I had put some greasy tonic on my hair to make it stay down; the reverse occurred. Having no time to fix it, I grabbed the fedora I always wore for the routine and hurried onstage. When I glanced at myself in the monitor as I started the bit, the way I looked — like Mark Twain's Injun Joe in Tom Sawyer — struck me so funny that I began to laugh. The fact that it was striking me funny struck me funny. It was the old laughing-in-church syndrome. Another reason I kept laughing was that the always funny rotund comedian Jack E. Leonard, the next guest scheduled to appear, was yelling lines at me from the wings. I was eating into his time by laughing for so long. "Come on, goddamit," he bellowed. "I've got only five minutes and you've blown three of them already!"

I might have mentioned that one of the things that probably contributed to Mr. Allen's hysteria was that it was live television. When he started laughing at how much he was laughing, he knew all of America was seeing a grown man doing it at that very moment. There's an immediacy to being on live that adds to the risk…and therefore the potential silliness when things go wrong. Anyway, it's a funny clip.

Today's Video Link

Maybe if I spent some time on it, I could come up with an answer…but right this minute, I can't think of a living cartoonist whose work is more respected by his peers than is Mort Drucker. His caricatures for MAD have been nothing short of amazing and I doubt there's a person drawing likenesses anywhere who hasn't been influenced by his work. What's especially impressive about his MAD work is that most of it has been for multi-page parodies of movies and TV shows. It's one thing to draw a good rendition of a celebrity once…but to do four or five views of the person per page for five pages? There are a lot of good caricaturists out there who'd just wind up repeating one or two angles over and over. Not Mort.

Coming any day now — and you can order a copy over at this site — is a two-hour documentary/tutorial that I gather is like a video correspondence course. Here's a preview that runs a little less than eight minutes…

VIDEO MISSING

A Surefire Pick

Here's a Tweet I just posted…

Sarah Palin says her selection to be John McCain's running mate was "God's plan." That's right. God himself wanted McCain to lose.

Breaking News

Tune in to this weblog tomorrow for additional information about the most vital issue of our time.

That's right. Someone may have found Jack Benny in Casablanca.

The Trials of O'Brien

iftheymated

So where are we now with the Leno/O'Brien situation? If you believe what's being leaked — and there's a pretty big "if" in that phrase — the hitch is that Conan O'Brien is balking at the pushback to 12:05. There are suggestions out there that Fox may offer him a show at 11 PM and that he'd take it before he'd let NBC move him to the midnight hour.

The trouble with parsing all this leakage is that we don't, for example, know exactly what's in the various contracts. Some sources are saying that Conan's deal with NBC pays him a huge sum of money if he doesn't get at least a full two-year tour of duty on The Tonight Show, but that the network can move him and the show by that name to 12:05 without triggering that penalty. Is this so? The amount quoted seems to vary from report to report. It's always huge but the fact that no one seems to know precisely how much it is makes me wonder what else these sources don't know. That would be a major factor in what's going to happen but we don't know if that contractual provision exists or if so, if there are loopholes or outs in it.

On the Conan side, I'm going to guess that staying at 11:35 at NBC no longer seems possible so they're looking at securing the next-best situation. They'll talk to Fox and other suitors…but Fox would have to put down a huge amount of money and a long-term on-air commitment to make that happen. Would they make such an offer to a guy who, when you look at the numbers, isn't doing all that well at 11:35?

Hard to say. Networks can be funny about taking away shows or stars from each other. Sometimes, it can look like a coup to steal away a competitor's asset. Other times, it looks like you're so unable to generate your own hits that you're grabbing for someone else's discards. And you have to remember that what works one place may not work in another. Fox got burned pretty badly by the assumption that Joan Rivers at 11 PM would get at least the same ratings she was getting at 11:35 when she filled in for Johnny Carson on The Tonight Show. She didn't. Not even close.

Then you had The Chevy Chase Show in the same time slot. That one was such a disaster that they probably don't want to rush into putting another such program on there; not without a lot of research and consideration. They might like the idea of Conan but this is looking like a deal that has to be made in the next week or so…or not at all. O'Brien's numbers for NBC haven't been bad with the kind of demographic group that Fox covets, but they probably don't justify the kind of sudden offer that would make him jump. If I had to bet, I'd bet that all this talk of Conan heading to Fox is being exaggerated by a media that likes to ratchet up the drama in a story like this.

In the meantime over at CBS, David Letterman and Craig Ferguson are "very close" to being signed to stay put "deep into 2012." Letterman started his late night career with an NBC show that debuted in February of 1982 and ran until June of 1993. Then he was off the air for two months before he started his current CBS show. If he were to retire in April of 2012 — these are approximate dates — he would have logged thirty years total in late night TV. Is the plan something like that, to come out with a round number that approximates Mr. Carson's record?

Probably not, and it's probably too soon to think about that. One thing for certain: Whenever Dave does his last show, it'll come in a network ratings "sweeps" period. No one knows yet when that will occur in 2012, just as Dave probably doesn't know now how he'll feel then about retirement. At the moment, for us viewers, it's just nice to have some stability in the daypart.