Recommended Reading

For those of you who aren't thoroughly sick of the whole Conan/Jay story: Bill Carter breaks down some of the ratings problems that Conan O'Brien had with his Tonight Show. Conan was being consistently beaten by Letterman in all the significant demographic groups except viewers aged 18-34…and in that area, Conan was being beaten by The Colbert Report and almost being tied by Adult Swim. Leno's Tonight Show even fared better with that group.

The Playhouse is Open Again

I haven't seen it yet (and may not be able to even get tickets if and when I can go) but the revival of Pee-Wee Herman's show seems to be a big hit down at the Nokia Theater here in Los Angeles. Friends who've been say it's great and the ol' rumor mill is saying it'll tour, playing Vegas, maybe even stopping off on Broadway for a while. This all sounds like good news and it prompts me to recall seeing Paul Reubens playing Pee-Wee at the Groundlings Theater here in L.A., developing the character until it finally became what it became.

Around '81, it got to the point where there was a Midnight show done every Saturday night…a surreal evening that went on a little long, though its length somehow added to the quixotic nature of it all. Pee-Wee showed cartoons and public service films. He lobbed Tootsie Rolls into the audience, including one, inadvertently, directly into my eye. He welcomed an endless array of odd friends onto his playhouse stage. And at the end of the show, he learned how to fly, which I gather is the plot of the new show, as well. Two people who later became friends of mine separate from one another — Dawna Kaufmann and Bill Steinkellner — were highly responsible for assembling the proceedings, and it was full of fine performers including Phil Hartman, Edie McClurg and John Paragon.

Pee-Wee had a sweetness then. The character changed back and forth in the years after. Sometimes, he was a real innocent ten-year-old boy who just happened to be played on stage or screen by a much older man. And sometimes, he was a much older (and meaner) man who in some sort of sick dementia thought he was a ten year old boy. On the Saturday morning program, you generally got the sweeter Pee-Wee, and that's why I thought it all worked. That was the Pee-Wee of the Midnight show.

The night I went to it was one of the more memorable and oddest nights I've spent in a theater. It was sold out for the duration of its run and I was only able to get seats because I'd met Bill Steinkellner, who'd directed it. I took a lady friend of mine named Bridget Holloman (sad obit here) and we were there on time but the show was not. An understudy was going on and needed extra rehearsal so we all stood in the lobby for a half-hour or so…and then there were tech delays. The festivities started around 1 AM and went on and on and on, apparently a lot longer than they usually did. To make timekeeping matters even stranger, it was a night when we set the clocks ahead so when we got out two-and-a-half hours later, it was not 3:30 AM but 4:30 AM. And the show wasn't over.

No one at the theater had uttered the words "Canter's Delicatessen" aloud but somehow everyone there knew that was the place to go. Without consultation, we all piled into our respective vehicles and caravaned over to that wonderful open-24-hours deli on Fairfax. This included many of the cast members, some still in costume or at least character. It was like the third act of the play with corned beef added. People were performing at their tables or in the aisles and the Canter's waitstaff was sidestepping them and acting like this was the most natural thing in the world. In the booth next to ours was Phil Hartman, still wearing about half his makeup as the gruff Captain Carl and barking out his order for Matzo Brei the way an old sea cap'n would order Matzo Brei.

It was well after 5 AM, maybe closer to six when Bridget and I finally got back to my home. I asked her if she'd enjoyed the experience and she said, "I don't know…but I wouldn't have missed it for the world." The folks enjoying the current offering down at the Nokia may well feel the same way but I can't believe it's as memorable as the all-encompassing dinner theater production we attended. It was so very special to visit the playhouse and stay up with Pee-Wee 'til that close to dawn.

From the E-Mailbag…

Deborah Blair writes to ask…

I'm a little puzzled on one aspect of all this. Was Conan O'Brien fired or did he quit? And do you think this whole thing has damaged Jay forever?

As to the first question: A little of each, actually…and I think the man deserves great credit (this is not sarcasm) for spinning the whole story as "Conan being screwed" instead of "Conan not getting the ratings." It could have gone either way. At the Television Critics Association Press Tour in Pasadena, NBC sent one of their execs, Dick Ebersol, out to try and spin it in the latter rotation and no one was buying. O'Brien had already claimed the high ground and defined the narrative.

Conan and Jay both were doing shows that were performing well below expectations. Due to some combination of affiliate unrest and a simple reading of the numbers, NBC decided that neither show could be left in place for as long as they'd told the hosts they would have. It is hard to say from afar how much wiggle room the network had to leave one or both on in their respective time slots.

They came up with this idea to have a half-hour of Jay at 11:35 followed by a full hour of Conan at 12:05. Mr. O'Brien objected, saying he thought it was an insult to the grand and glorious tradition of The Tonight Show. I'm not sure I buy that as his prime concern…and let's note that many of the folks who cheered that stance probably still think Tonight would be in better hands with Conan at 12:05 than with the obvious alternative of Jay at 11:35. What I think Conan was thinking was that it was a halfway step towards shoving him back to 12:35…or off the schedule completely. NBC would also pay a larger settlement to get him off 11:35 than to remove him from a later slot if it came to that.

So what he and his managers did was cleverly arrange things so he didn't exactly quit and wasn't exactly fired — as close to a "no fault" separation as is possible in a mess like this. Such resolutions work out better for both sides. Forevermore, he can say, "I could have made 11:35 work but NBC didn't give me the chance." And the network can say, "We didn't fire Conan. We were willing to keep him on indefinitely but at a slightly later hour." I'm not entirely sure that the 11:35/12:05 proposal wasn't NBC's way of setting up precisely that situation.

As to your second question — has it damaged Jay forever?: In a business where Mel Gibson is still considered a top box office draw, I don't think very much can damage a star forever. You lose stature when it's perceived that your success/failure ratio has swung too far into the red…but personal stuff? You kind of have to go the O.J. Simpson route for the public to shun you. And of course, I think the case that Jay did anything wrong is pretty flimsy to begin with.

NBC's Jeff Gaspin was asked the question recently in a press conference of reporters and he said something that I think was basically accurate. He said, "I don't think most of America cares about this stuff as much as we do." If Jay loses audience share — and I expect he'll lose some — it'll probably have more to do with people not liking his show, as opposed to not liking him. Basically, he needs to remind viewers what it was they enjoyed about him before the Conan magilla and before the 10 PM show.

'Twill be interesting to see what kind of guest bookings his renewed Tonight Show will get right away. A number of celebs, even if they see Jay as the injured party in all this, may not want to appear to be taking sides. I don't think very many folks in show biz are like Rosie O'Donnell who, contrary to the evidence, seems to think Conan got bounced because Leno came in and demanded The Tonight Show back. But everyone in the industry (including, I'm sure, Jay) is sympathetic to the concept of a performer who wasn't given enough of a chance. Whether or not they think Conan was, they may want to steer clear for a while of being too supportive of his replacement. Let's see how fast Jay has to call on buddies like Jerry Seinfeld and Arnold Schwarzenegger to sit in his guest chair.

Today's Video Link

My blog isn't happy unless it has a little Laurel and Hardy on it from time to time. Here's the trailer from the last film they made for the Hal Roach Studio before decamping for Twentieth-Century Fox, Saps at Sea. As a kid, I owned — and come to think of it, still own 'cause it's in a closet here somewhere — an 8mm silent print of this movie. A company called Blackhawk Films released it, adding in title cards here and there to make up for the absence of sound. I'm not sure why I bought it or if I ever watched it all the way through that way. As much as I love Stan and Ollie, their sound films kinda need sound…and this one, which is about how Hardy goes nuts whenever he hears a horn, needs it more than most. I guess I just love to watch these guys…

VIDEO MISSING

The Hits Just Keep On Comin'…

In the mid-to-late sixties in L.A., the radio station to listen to was 93 KHJ, Boss Radio. They played pretty much the same Top 40 list as competing stations but KHJ had a great between-records sound and some colorful disc jockeys…and most of all, they always seemed to have some fun promo or contest going on. For a week or two there, for example, you could win a lot of money (a lot for a local station to give away, at least) if you could identify Location X.

Location X was a spot somewhere in Southern California. Every hour, whoever was on the air would play about ten seconds of audio recorded at Location X. He'd give out a little clue as to its whereabouts. And some lucky caller would get a chance to guess. I remember we all got caught up in the mystery at my school and spent a lot of time trying to parse the hints and deduce the elusive answer, not so much because we thought we'd win the loot but because it was an intriguing puzzle. Eventually, some caller got it. It turned out to be the merry-go-round at Lincoln Park.

Click above and watch it grow.

Where is Lincoln Park? I don't know now and I didn't know then. None of my friends did, either. We all felt cheated when the answer was revealed, the way you'd feel cheated if, for example, you read a thick murder mystery and on the last page, the killer turned out to be someone who hadn't even been mentioned in the book before. In protest, a few of us switched our allegiance to a competing station, KRLA.

Perhaps the biggest promotion KHJ ever did was to announce the coming of the Big Kahuna. Who was the Big Kahuna? Just some actor they'd hired. The idea was to create a celebrity D.J. for personal appearances and to promote the station and it succeeded wildly. No one in L.A. really knew who The Big Kahuna was or why it was the event of the decade that he was arriving in Los Angeles and joining the Boss Jocks at Boss Radio. But they made it sound so important that crowds turned out, people tuned in and a genuine media event was manufactured.

I vaguely recall that he was treated as some sort of trendsetting wiseman…kind of a Hawaiian version of the Maharishi Mahesh Yogi but without the religious overtones. Instead of teaching us Transcendental Meditation, he was there to teach us how to be cool…though what his credentials were in this department, no one ever explained. And that's about all I remember. Basically, he was briefly famous for being briefly famous.

What prompted this recollection was reading Ken Levine telling us that the Big Kahuna is no more. The actor who played him, Chris Varez (I never knew that name before) has died at the age of 69. Aloha, Big Kahuna! I have no idea why I thought you were important but I did for a while there. And I certainly think it's sad to see another element of my teenage years get old enough to go.

Double Zero

zerohour06

My pal Jim Brochu is in New York these days, racking up unanimous raves for his one-man off-Broadway production, Zero Hour. In it, Jim transforms himself miraculously into the late Zero Mostel and enables us to spend some time with this most fascinating of men. He discusses his career, being Jewish, being Tevye, being blacklisted…all sorts of topics.

The play is currently at the Gotham's Theater at St. Clement's, where it's in a limited engagement that must end on January 31. But if you don't get there by then, don't panic. It's just been announced it will reopen at the DR2 Theater there on February 24 for an open-ended run. We are happy for our friend Jim, even though this means we won't see much of him back here for a long time.

Play-On Words

On Conan O'Brien's last show, guest Tom Hanks was played on with the Beatles song, "Lovely Rita, Meter Maid" — a reference, of course, to Hanks' wife, Rita Wilson. This, by the way, is the same song that Paul Shaffer usually uses to play Mr. Hanks on when he comes on to converse with D. Letterman.

It has made the rounds of the Internet — and even been reported in articles like this one — that this was a departing act of sabotage by the O'Brien gang. To play that song, they reported, costs a fee of half a million dollars. ?uestlove, the bandleader on Late Night With Jimmy Fallon, said as much in a widely-quoted Twitter posting.

This is not so. NBC will not pay a half-mil to Sony (which controls the Beatles catalog) for the use of that song, just as CBS pays no such fee when Mr. Shaffer plays it. The amount will be modest…a few bucks, nothing NBC doesn't expect.

I'm kinda stunned people believe that Conan O'Brien, after just asking America to donate to help the poor citizens of Haiti, would turn around and toss a half-million bucks away for what wouldn't even be much of a joke. Moral of the story: Never listen to a man whose name starts with a punctuation mark.

Cut to the Chase

charleychase01

Back in this posting, I introduced some of you to the joys of a comedian of long ago, a gent named Charley Chase. He was a very funny person and he made very funny short films which are rarely seen these days.

Some of his rarest were the talkies he made for Columbia Pictures from 1937 through 1940. He did a lot of directing for Columbia (mostly of The Three Stooges) but he also starred in some films that languish in the Sony/Columbia vaults. They think there's no market for these pictures and so they plan no DVD, no release of any kind. Chase fan Yair Solan thinks otherwise and has set up this online petition, urging Columbia to release these wonderful comedies. If you have a moment, please go sign it. I don't think petitions to end the war or influence our government do any good whatsoever but we can (perhaps) make a difference over something like this. At least, it won't hurt to have the relevant folks at Sony see that thousands of people out here want to see Charley's Columbia films out on DVD.

To learn more about Charley Chase, go to Yair's site. Do not (I repeat:) do not Google Charley's name as its been seized by a porn actress and you'll only get pictures of her.

In the meantime and fortunately: There's a wonderful 4-disk set out that includes copies of many fine silent Chase comedies. We recommend it and him highly. Here's an Amazon link to order.

Today's Video Link

It's Cartoon Time, kiddies! This is one that's embedded in my brain from having seen it 7,448 times between the ages of 4 and 8. Sheriff John Rovick on KTTV here in Los Angeles used to run Tom & Jerry cartoons on his daily noontime show, Sheriff John's Lunch Brigade. The Sheriff was a genial, gentle man who put on a great show even if he did only have about eight cartoons to run over and over and over.

This is, of course, not the famed cat 'n' mouse duo named Tom & Jerry. This is an earlier pair whose cartoons were animated between 1931 and 1933 by the Van Beuren Studios. They made 26 of these and among the folks responsible was a young gagman named Joseph Barbera. Years later, of course, Mr. Barbera would team up with Bill Hanna to make the cartoons of the other Tom & Jerry. Thanks to Sheriff John, I've always had a warm spot for the human versions and particularly remember this film, which was released on December 9, 1932. I'm about to watch it for the 7,449th time…

Recommended Reading

Here's a long profile of John Mackey, the co-founder and CEO of the Whole Foods Market chain. It's nice to hear Mackey is conflicted about his stores because so am I, though for different reasons. I frequent one and generally find things overpriced and with a high rate of disappointment. What's good at the one near me is real good (mostly produce and what's in the meat and seafood counters) but there's an awful lot that looks good and turns out to be not that wonderful once you get it home. I kinda like the idea of the place more than the execution, I guess.

Still Standing

Jay Leno

At the risk of horrifying certain friends of mine — something I do every day, I would imagine — I would like to defend Jay Leno. I'm not going to address the issue of whether you oughta find him funny or not. If you don't, you don't. I generally do, especially in a live setting, and based on his success rate, I'm obviously far from alone. I also note his demographics and who I see in the audience when I go see him in person and I reject the idea that one specific generation or age bracket doesn't like him. Heck, I don't even buy the idea that — of Dave, Conan, Jay or the others — I even have to have a favorite. Anything wrong with liking all of them?

By way of full disclosure, I should say that I've met Jay on a number of occasions dating back to his Comedy Store days, and sometimes sold (or more often, given) him jokes. He has been unfailingly nice to me and everyone around him. I also have several friends who have worked for the guy and they have nothing but good to say about him. I'm sure there are those out there with different experiences but you tend to give more weight to first and second-hand encounters.

Some (note the "some") of the attacks on him from within the industry fall into the twin categories of Personal and Professional Jealousy. Leno is a notoriously prosperous, well-adjusted guy. He has no drinking problem. He has no drug problem. He has a famously happy marriage. He has more money than any of us and more cars than they make these days in Detroit. He also has a ratings track record that anyone in any part of the television industry would kill for. And perhaps most maddening to some is that he keeps having these publicized dilemmas and winning, surviving when his detractors have written him off for dead. Some people — especially those he's bested in the ratings or refused to have on his show — keep being denied their Schadenfreude and can't resist kicking a guy when he might, at long last, be down.

And some of it is folks who don't like his act, don't like his comedy, which is to be expected in this world. From that though, they leap to "He's not funny" and an insistence that his achievements could not possibly be Kosher. Those who flock to see him must be deluded or simple-minded, and all those steps up the ladder could not possibly have been earned. For the record, there are a number of very popular, wealthy comedians who rarely make me laugh…but I recognize that plenty of other folks find them hilarious and that's why they're popular and wealthy.

I don't like everything Jay's done. I wince at some of his political views and was not at all comfortable with his actions during the recent Writers Guild strike. That he went back to work bothered me but my Guild did clear him completely of all charges related to possible scabbing. Given that and the fact that I don't know all the legal considerations — the kinds of contractual problems he would have had as a performer if he hadn't returned — I grudgingly give him the benefit of the doubt here. I was, of course, very disappointed with his 10 PM effort and there are a number of things he did on The Tonight Show that sent me diving for the Fast Forward button on the TiVo remote. I don't think he's been at his best lately but that's true of Dave, Conan, most of them. Of all those guys, I think Craig Ferguson's the only one who's at the top of his game currently, though Conan's final week was terrific.

I have already written here that I don't think Leno did anything unethical or all that unusual in the manuevers that got him The Tonight Show job in the first place; that it was a natural process, at least to the extent anything is ever natural in network television. In the matter of the rearrangement with Conan, consider: Jay was doing a very successful Tonight Show. No crime there. NBC decided to take it away from him and give it to Conan. That might have been dumb on the network's part but Jay was gracious in stepping aside from a job that he wanted. Given his ratings clout and wealth, he could easily have engaged a killer attorney and pressured NBC to find a loophole in Conan's deal or renege and buy the guy off. Leno could also have immediately made a deal with Fox or ABC to go up against Conan and try to crush him in some emotional lust for revenge. Perhaps neither move would have worked but as far as we know, Jay didn't even try. I'm not sure I would have been as cooperative if I was thrown out of the biggest game of my life, especially when I was winning.

Those seeking to make some sort of case against him are arguing like his acquiescence included a pledge to go away, retire from network television and go work on his cars forever more. All he agreed to was to hand off The Tonight Show to Conan and he did, agreeably. He even had Conan on his last show, thereby making it at least partly about Conan O'Brien and not wholly about Jay Leno. How often in TV do people pass on an opportunity for self-congratulation? Not too often…

Taking the 10 PM slot on NBC, I'm sure, looked lucrative and it was also a good way to keep 175 people — the ones who helped put on a very successful Tonight Show — employed. But it was probably a mistake in the sense that the show was a mistake. It was not a breach of ethics, and I don't get this argument that Jay had some sort of obligation to get off the stage in order to do everything possible to help make Conan's Tonight Show a success. He did the two most important things, which were (a) not to dump on Conan for shoving him aside and (b) to hand off the program in good shape with high ratings. Conan continued those high ratings for about three days and then the show lost around half its (or Jay's) audience, plunging from First Place to Third, where it largely remained until talk of it moving or ending got it some attention.

I like Conan and once even told him so. I think Andy Richter's one of the funniest people on television and I'm glad that they finally moved him from being a distant announcer to an on-the-couch sidekick, thereby righting one of the early errors I think they made. Conan has/had first-rate producers and writers and, for my money, the best band of all the late night programs. But his Tonight Show did not connect with audiences as NBC had hoped…and it's annoying to see his partisans trying to spin that to blame Leno and his 10:00 thud. Conan took over The Tonight Show on June 1. The Jay Leno Show didn't start until mid-September, by which time Conan had been in last place for more than three months.

If you want to argue that before and after, Conan was victimized by bad lead-ins, okay. That's sure some of it. NBC had a 10 PM problem before Jay went on there. They had a 10 PM problem while he was on there. They'll probably have one after he's gone from there. The job description of hosting The Tonight Show pretty much comes these days with having to rebound from weak lead-ins. Somehow, Leno always managed it and Conan did not. Given more time, would that have happened? I don't know. Among the many aspects of this that must be eating at O'Brien and his staff is that no one will ever know. I'm sure at the network there were arguments, with one side noting that late night shows often build an audience over time. The other side probably said, "Yeah, but it's not like Conan O'Brien's an unknown quantity or some beginner who requires on-the-job training about how to do a talk show. He's been on for seventeen years."

As I've said here several times, I think he should have been given more time and I'm glad I don't have to say how much. One of the many reasons I'd never want to be a network programmer is that sitting at home, it's easy to say I'd cancel this, renew that, move some show to Tuesdays. It's the least exact of sciences but it's fun when no money rests on your decision and you really can't be proven wrong. If I were actually moving, cancelling and picking up the shows and millions (sometimes, billions) were on the line and my bosses and the affiliates were screaming at me to make a change, I'm not sure I'd be as apt to gamble and to rule out the safer decisions.

In this case, I don't think their decision to bail on Conan has a lot to do with Jay Leno, except for this: Jay's available. If he'd never done the 10 PM show and gone off to play Vegas and other places, he'd still be available. There would still be folks at that network looking at Conan's ratings and looking at Jay's and asking, "Can we get the guy with the chin back?" They might even be more apt to do that because Jay wouldn't have the prime-time disaster hanging over him, making some wonder how much he'd damaged himself with that failure.

If he'd said, "No, I don't want to take back The Tonight Show," that would have bought Conan more time on the air…but only because it would have taken several months for NBC to decide on someone else to host Tonight and to get that person up and running. Jeff Zucker and his team would not have said, "Okay, we can't get Jay back. Let's just be content with Conan finishing third and not have anyone else lined up to replace him if he doesn't pick up." Networks are not content — and come on, you know this — to finish last. Especially with a show that not that long ago was in First Place and earning them tons more money.

Yeah, I understand why Letterman and Kimmel are cranky about all this. Their ratings went up when Jay went away and now he's coming back. I understand why those who like Conan O'Brien (and I am one of 'em) don't like seeing him go away, even if he might be back as soon as September. I even understand an exasperation at watching a big company like NBC have this public, dysfunctional meltdown and screw with what's on our sets.

What I don't get is why some people think Leno had a moral obligation to retire and disappear. They didn't like that he did that 10 PM show. They didn't like that he was willing to do the half-hour show at 11:35 when that was proposed. They don't like that he's going to take back a show that he and his crew didn't want to give up in the first place. I know some of you don't think the guy's ever funny but you oughta try what I do. If I don't like a performer, I don't watch him. It's just as effective as if he did disappear and it saves a lot of time.

Set the TiVo!

Jay Leno does Oprah on Thursday.

Go Read It!

In the movie of Mary Poppins, Dick Van Dyke played two roles — Bert, the Chimney Sweep with the rotten British accent…and Mr. Dawes, the elderly banker.

The stage version of Mary Poppins is currently playing in New York and Los Angeles. In fact, I'm seeing the L.A. version next week. The stage version does not usually include the role of Mr. Dawes but the other night in the Los Angeles production, they added in a new scene — probably for one night only — which featured the aged bank president. And you'll never guess who they got to play him!

Thanks to Shelly Goldstein (who's seeing the show on Tuesday) for the info.