With Great Power…

spidermancostume

Nikke Finke posted this item on her blog under the headline, "Why Hollywood Moguls Are Such Dickwads?" (The URL title is "Why Are Hollywood Moguls Such Asswipes?" I wish she'd make up her mind.)

I found this interesting: Tobey Maguire last night was a guest on Conan and said the Sony Pictures execs wouldn't give him the Spider-Man suit even after he shot the first and second movies in the franchise. (Insiders now claim he never asked…) Calling it humilating, he said he mentioned it on Oprah. Only then did the studio send him not just one but two Spidey suits.

I don't get how the headline fits the item. First off, it doesn't even pretend to tell us "why." And though not one person in this town would question that moguls can be dickwads — if not asswipes — this isn't much of an example of that.

Then, you have to presume he asked for one. Finke admits the record isn't clear on that. Secondly, you have to presume he asked the appropriate Hollywood Mogul. If he asked, say, the person in charge of wardrobe, they probably didn't have the authority to hand over studio property worth — what? — a hundred grand or so? These movies are an ongoing franchise and it's kinda possible that they might need those costumes again.

Plus, there's this: Mr. Maguire just signed for Spider-Man 4 and 5 for a reported $50 million plus a share of profits. If he wanted a costume, his agent could have just called up the head of Sony and said, "Hey, Tobey would also like two Spider-Man suits and a couple of Maseratis," and they would have had them at his door within the hour.

And there's really this: A man named Steve Ditko designed that costume. What Tobey Maguire gets paid per day for wearing it is probably more money than Mr. Ditko has earned in his entire life. That strikes me as maybe a bigger injustice than the fact that Maguire had to ask on Oprah to get one.

Today's Political Rant

People keep e-mailing me links to articles that declare the "hoax" of Global Warming is over; that the e-mails that some are calling "Climategate" prove that beyond a shadow of a scintilla of a hint of a doubt. I might start to believe this if I saw these new disclosures convincing even one person who already didn't think Global Warming was a fraud. From what I see, these leaked e-mails prove nothing of the sort.

I have an odd viewpoint about Climate Change. I want to believe it's a myth. I think the best thing that could happen on this front would be for us to see some decisive proof that we have nothing to worry about. Don't you think that? I just see the case for environmental disaster as, at present, a lot stronger than the case against. It's like 80% in favor of the kind of stuff Al Gore and others are discussing, and 20% against…and the probable disasters if the 80% side is right are so cataclysmic that we can't just sit and hope they're wrong. Supposing there was an 80% chance a bomb was about to go off on your block and a 20% chance it wasn't. Would you just sit there and wait to see how things turn out? I wouldn't, even if it was only a 5% chance.

Of course, everyone can argue the percentages. I say 80/20. You might think 70/30 or 50/50 or 20/80. I think it's about 80/20. The new "Climategate" revelations don't budge the ratio for me…but even if they did, I'd still be at like 79/21. I also think — and I'll bet you agree with me on this — that there are a lot of looneys on both sides, offering up bogus "evidence" that their view is inarguable. When Mankind looks back on this controversy — assuming, of course, that there is a Mankind to look back on it — they're going to note that even a lot of people who were on the "right" side of the question were full of crap.

Today's Video Link

I have no idea who "Idiots of Ants" are, nor any idea of why I would want to know that. I guess the name is a play on "idiot savants" but whoever they are, they did this eight-minute interview with John Cleese. You might also enjoy reading this recent chat with the man for Vanity Fair. Both contain interesting insights about his work and (perhaps) a bit too much info about his private life…

Piece O' History

I found this thanks to a link from my pal Aaron Barnhart. It's an article about the blacklisting that went on in the fifties, more specifically at CBS. What's chilling is that it incudes a reproduction of an actual "do not hire" list with names like Zero Mostel, Jack Guilford [sic], Leonard Bernstein, Howard da Silva, Gene Kelly, Burt Lancaster, Garson Kanin, Ruth Gordon and Philip Loeb. Philip Loeb is the actor who committed suicide because of what the blacklist did to his career.

iPhone, uPhone, we all Phone for iPhone!

iphone01

Johnny Carson used to say that if you were ever lost in the desert, the easiest way to get help would be to mix a martini. Immediately, you'd be surrounded by a dozen people telling you, "That's not the way to make a martini!"

In the same vein: If you ever want to get e-mail, just announce on the 'net that you've purchased some piece of electronic equipment. Your inbox will instantly fill with messages from people telling you, "That's not the one you should have bought." And I just want to say here that some (some, not all) Mac users are really insufferable in this way. Every time I post here that I'm having the tiniest dilemma with my PC, I get some e-mail that says, "Get a sledge hammer and smash that piece of crap machine into smithereens, then go out and buy a Mac. All your problems will be over." Apparently, no one has ever had the slightest problem with a Mac.

Anyway, I mention all this because I just got an iPhone. The briefest mention of it here the other day is already bringing me comments like, "Good to see you're wising up that Apple is the only way to go. Any day now, you'll see the light of day and get a Mac." (I know how you people feel. I used to own a Betamax.)

I got rid of the Blackberry that served me well for years because (a) it was malfunctioning, (b) I wanted applications it doesn't have or doesn't do well, and (c) I had a great offer for a 3G iPhone with 32 megs. Did I make the right choice? So far, I think so.

I like the e-mail handling better on the Blackberry but the phone part better on the iPhone. Or at least, I think I will once I get my car kit properly configured, which is going to take a partial reinstallation. But I'm getting used to typing on the new machine and I'm enjoying the speed and variety of applications…like checking the news or weather or making restaurant reservations. The Blackberry wasn't really made for that kind of thing…though I did like the one that allowed me to program my TiVos at home. The iPhone, for some reason, has nothing comparable yet. I also like the little MobileMe interface.

I haven't gotten into music and podcasts, nor have I used the camera much. All in due time. But I'll be reporting as I play with the thing and this is my first report. More will follow.

Recommended Reading

More from Fred Kaplan on what Obama plans to do with Afghanistan. I wish I felt more confident about all this than I do. It's beginning to feel like one of those "we're screwed no matter what we try" situations.

Foto File

Just came across this photo on my D drive. I'm not sure who took it but it was in June Foray's backyard around 1972. The occasion was a sale of animation cels that had been donated to raise money for ASIFA Hollywood, a fine organization that has done much to boost the prestige and preservation of cartoons. The society was started on June's instigation and one weekend, she had this big event to come up with the cash to get the thing going. It did and it's still around, bigger than ever.

Who's in the pic? Back row: The gent at left is the great Bob Clampett, who directed some of the best Warner Brothers cartoons and later gave us Beany and Cecil. To the right of Bob is Shel Dorf, the recently-deceased founder of the Comic-Con in San Diego. And then at the right in the back row is me. In front of Bob is my longtime friend, Tom Stern. And then the guy with the yellow shirt is Richard Butner, who took over around then as the chairman of the Comic-Con…another one of those indispensable folks who made the con what it is today. And that's about it for this photo.

Today's Video Link

Here's another tune by one of my favorite novelty bands, Big Daddy. As I've explained before here, they were a group that took recent hit rock songs and rearranged them in the style of the fifties. The act is no longer active but their records and CDs (all on the Rhino label) aren't that hard to find it you do a little hunting. Whoever made this video illustrated the tune with a slide show of their album covers.

What song are they improving this time? "Whip It" by Devo. As usual, I like it much better their way…

VIDEO MISSING

Recommended Reading

One of the tactics Republicans are using to try and stop the Democrats' Health Care Reform plan is to try and scare older folks with the following worry: The plan calls for much money to be taken out of Medicare…and that, they say, will cause massive cutbacks in services to the point where many seniors will die.

Many things are wrong with that argument. One is that people are dying because they don't have health insurance, and the G.O.P. is trying to stop them from getting it. Another is that the Republican Party has never exactly been a protector of Medicare and would probably prefer its elimination. But the big fib in there is that the whole claim doesn't seem to be true. Says who? Well, the A.A.R.P. is saying the Repubs are wrong on this…and they kinda have the best interests of older Americans at heart.

Twenty Points of Light

omron01

A few weeks ago, my mother's doctor asked me to start monitoring her blood pressure. He suggested I get one of those home testers and use it to check her every few days. So I bought the best available model of what I'd heard was the leading maker of such devices — the Omron IA2 Digital Blood Pressure Monitor. I took it over to Mom's, strapped her into it…and got a reading about 20 points higher than the one her doctor had gotten when he tested her, low-tech style, the previous day.

A jump of 20 points in eighteen hours? It's possible but it didn't seem likely. I tested her every day or so for the following week and every reading was around 20 points above what it had been in her doctor's office. I began to suspect my mother wasn't malfunctioning. The machine was.

Then I had an appointment with my doctor — nothing important, just routine — and while waiting in the examining room, I noticed an Omron IA2 Digital Blood Pressure Monitor. When my doc came in, I asked him about it. "Never use 'em," he said. "They have them in all the rooms here and I don't think anyone uses them. They're always twenty points too high."

Well, that's good to know. I asked him why they were here. He said, "I don't know." But when I told him about my experiences with the one I bought, he said, "Let's test it." He took my blood pressure the old-fashioned way. Then we waited two minutes and took it with the Omron. The Omron was twenty points higher. Exactly.

When we exited the examining room, he asked one of the older doctors in his office about the blood pressure devices. The older doctor said, "Oh, those? They're always twenty points high."

"So why do we have them?"

"I've never been sure. I think Donna [whoever that is] ordered a batch of them because the clinic got a deal. Every so often, we have a nurse trainee or someone who doesn't know how to check blood pressure and they use them. But if they do, I always recheck. That's how I know they're always twenty points too high."

I asked the questions you'd ask and here's what roughly what the doctor said: "It's actually a very well-made product. In a sense, it's too good. When you take a blood pressure with one of these —" and here, he fiddled with his stethoscope like Oliver Hardy playing with his necktie "— you're listening for the brachial pulse and for an indicator called the Karotkoff sound. The machine has better hearing than any doctor or nurse so it senses those sounds much quicker and…well, that's why it's always too high." (I am, by the way, approximating his explanation from memory. If I got it wrong, forgive me…but it was something like that.)

Anyway, he went on to say that the machines are, at least, consistent. "If you use it and it shows a higher total than it did the last time, that's a good indicator than your blood pressure is going up. You just have to remember to subtract 20 if you're comparing the numbers to a blood pressure reading done by a doctor. There are machines that take that into account but they're not for home use." When I got home, I did a little Googling and found a lot of folks saying that their Omron is always 20 points too high.

Okay, so here's me being logical again. Are these machines really and truly always 20 points high? If so, I would imagine the Omron folks could fix that in about the time it takes me to adjust a bathroom scale that's always 20 pounds over. I've gotta be missing something here.

[UPDATE, a little less than two hours later: Four people have written me to say they have an Omron that is either accurate or which they hope is accurate because if their blood pressure is really 20 points lower, they're in trouble. I don't doubt theirs may be correct. But how come so many people (Google "Omron" and "20 points" and you'll see at least a dozen examples) get readings that are consistently 20 points too high?]

Today's Political Comment

Congress is thinking of doing away with the Estate Tax. This would enable very, very, very, very, very, very, very rich people to become very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very rich people. It would cost this country an awful lot of money. It would not prevent you from inheriting (without any tax at all) your Aunt Hilda's wealth.

I think cutting taxes is a great idea, especially if we cut spending at the same time. But we oughta be cutting them for the middle class, not just for folks related to Bill Gates and Warren Buffett…neither of whom, I believe, are in favor of this move. This article will tell you more.

Today's Video Link

Watch as Henny Youngman tells sixteen jokes in two minutes and eleven seconds…

Recommended Reading

Bryan Appleyard (great name) used to believe that all this talk of Global Warming was just Hot Air that wasn't really getting any hotter. Then he did something kinda radical. He did research.

Recommended Listening

So, I'm guessing you're a fan of Monty Python's Life of Brian, right? Yeah, well it figures. You come to this site. You must have something of my tastes. Well anyway, you might enjoy listening to this. It's an hour-long documentary on BBC Radio entitled He's Not the Messiah, He's a Very Naughty Boy. It's all about the making of that fine film.

Give a listen and do it quick. The link expires in less than a week. Oh, and don't thank me for this. Thank Greg Erhbar. He's the one who told me about it. He also told me about BBC Radio offering up their re-creation of the radio series starring Groucho and Chico Marx, Flywheel, Shyster and Flywheel. You can listen to episodes of that here. And while you're over there, go here to catch installments of Groucho Was My Father, the audio biography of Miriam Marx.