Today's Video Link

Here again, in honor of the day, is Jerky Turkey, a Tex Avery cartoon that was released by MGM on April 7, 1945. Tex did a number of cartoons like this, trying to create a new Bugs Bunny by whipping up some annoying character who gets chased around for seven minutes, forever turning the tables on his pursuer. This isn't the best but it's also not the worst.

Most references say that Daws Butler supplied the voice of the turkey and that Bill Thompson played the Pilgrim, and I'm pretty sure they're wrong on both. Not only does the turkey not sound like Daws's Durante impression but Daws didn't even get into the animation business until several years after this cartoon was in theaters. The doughy pilgrim has a voice not unlike Thompson's Droopy/Wallace Wimple sound but without its distinctive texture. So who are we listening to? Beats me. It might be Harry E. Lang, who was in most of the cartoons Tex was making around this time, though the voice coming out of that turkey call sounds like Frank Graham and it would be odd to hire him just to do that one line. Enjoy…

VIDEO MISSING

Tryptophantastic Tales

Just to remind you: The folks who run the myth-busting website, Snopes.com, say that it's not true that eating turkey can make you drowsy. I used to think that. Then I realized that it was listening to my relatives at the dinner table that was putting me to sleep.

Shame and Glory

My pal Jim Brochu is in New York doing his one-guy show as Zero Mostel. I wish I could get back there to see it again and I also wish I'd been present Tuesday evening when, in conjunction with the play, a panel discussion was held about the blacklist. Participating were several individuals who, like Zero, lived through that time. They included Lee Grant, Jules Feiffer and the children of Ring Lardner, Dalton Trumbo and Jack Gilford.

Fortunately, we have Jim's partner Steve Schalchlin, who reports on the evening on his weblog and promises that a video of the entire event will soon be up on YouTube. I will be linking when it is.

By the way: If you hunt around on Steve's blog, you'll be able to read some of the rave reviews that Jim is receiving. The show, Zero Hour, is there until the end of January.

From the E-Mailbag…

I hadn't meant to spend a lot of blogging room on Top Banana, the Broadway show and movie starring Phil Silvers but the e-mail was just too interesting. Take this one from James H. Burns…

It's fun to note that both Top Banana and Some Like It Hot feature Grace Lee Whitney, who actually made her Broadway debut in the former (and is in the band, in the latter). This is only of interest, perhaps, because folks are always stunned to find out that the actress who played Yeoman Janice Rand on Star Trek had been around that long! Happily, last time I saw her, Grace still looks like a million bucks, and more importantly, is still a swell gal.

Or take this one from Robert Holmen about the 3-D trailer I linked you all to. I got a number of these…

If your red-blue glasses are like almost all red-blue 3-D glasses, you will have to flip them so the red lens is on the right in order to properly view the Top Banana trailer. Whoever did the modern red-blue conversion got it backwards (1950's 3-D movies were not released in red-blue). There is a certain percentage of the population that won't be able to tell the difference no matter how their glasses are flipped.

And lastly, here's one from Doug Dinger, who's the fellow who posted the video to which I linked…

As a long time reader and fan of your site, it was quite a suprise and thrill to see the trailer I posted to YouTube linked on your blog. Thanks.

A word of background; the trailer for Top Banana was never released in 3-D. They did, however, use the negative from the Left Eye camera. The feature release, however, used the Right Eye negative. Someone more clever than I noticed this, and was able to combine the two into anaglyph 3-D (which is why not every scene in the trailer is in 3-D – I guess they didn't consistently use the Left neg on the trailer.) At any rate, the trailer wouldn't have been Blue/Red 3-D anyway, since all 3-D films were released for polarized glasses.

But I guess we'll take what we can; I'm sure the original 3-D version is sitting in a can somewhere next to London After Midnight and Humorisk.

With Laurel & Hardy's Hats Off as the opening short. By the way, the Three Stooges made two 3-D shorts and you can download one of them from this site. And this Saturday out in Glendale, CA, the Alex Theater is running that same short (plus four 2-D Stooges shorts with Curly) as part of the 12th Annual Three Stooges Big Screen Event. I will not be there. I love the Stooges but (a) I'm not sure I could take five shorts in one sitting, (b) 3-D movies have a hypnotic effect on me that induces slumber and (c) I'm a little afraid of being in a room with that many Stooge fans.

This would conclude our little symposium on Top Banana except that I remembered and must share one anecdote that Phil Silvers told me during the one time I got to meet him. The show toured America and did fairly well everywhere…except opening night in Salt Lake City. Silvers said, "We lost the audience during the opening number. People even started walking out and I didn't understand why until a stage manager explained it during intermission."

There's an old burlesque catch-phrase that was quoted in that opening number. The lyric goes…

You gotta roll your eyes and make a funny face
Then do a take and holler, "This must be da place!"

The problem? It is written that Salt Lake City was founded when Mormon leader Brigham Young came upon the land and announced, "This is the place." The lyric would be changed for the second night and all performances thereafter…but the first-nighters thought Silvers was making fun of their religious heritage.

Quick Work

Wow. Lou Dobbs is considering a Senate run and he's just announced that he's in favor of amnesty for illegal aliens. The guy's been a politician for three days and already, he's pandering for possible votes by reversing his most strongly-held conviction.

I'm impressed. That usually takes most candidates an entire week.

Today's Bonus Video Link

Here it is…your favorite online video of the week! And probably next week, as well. And the week after that and the week after that…

Today's Political Rant

There may be good arguments against the current Democratic Health Care Reform Bill. I still think they pale against the G.O.P. alternative, which seems to be start over, take our time and come up with something after we have full employment, no national debt and flying cars. But I'm open to the idea that some aspects of it could be improved.

One argument that I don't think has any validity — that's just a case of grasping for anything negative they can say about the bill — is how long it is. Sure, it's a big, complex bill. It's a big, complex problem. If the bill works, it doesn't matter how long it is. And if it doesn't work, it doesn't matter how short it is.

Underscoring this is that there were no complaints about length when the Republicans authored a transportation bill that was only 68 words shorter. Here's a little primer that proves that size doesn't matter.

From the E-Mailbag…

Paul Castiglia writes to say…well, here. I'll cut 'n' paste and let you read it for yourself…

I'm not one to nitpick your classic comedy posts — you know more about the subject than I could ever hope to learn — but is it accurate to state that Jack Benny's film The Horn Blows at Midnight features "Margaret Dumont in a rare non-Marx appearance" when she also appeared in Kentucky Kernels and High Flyers with Wheeler & Woolsey, The Life of the Party with Joe Penner, Never Give a Sucker an Even Break with W.C. Fields, The Dancing Masters with Laurel & Hardy, Up in Arms with Danny Kaye, Seven Days Ashore with Brown & Carney and Little Giant with Abbott & Costello?

Of course, she made several other movies but my point is that there's always been this idea perpetuated, this misconception people have that Margaret Dumont was not only exclusively a foil for the Marx Brothers but in some folks' minds made nothing but Marx Brothers movies. And I think that gives short-shrift to her because obviously she was deemed worthy enough to co-star with Fields, Kaye, Laurel & Hardy, Abbott & Costello and even Wheeler & Woolsey whose names may mean zilch to most people today but as you know, being mega-successful at the box office, they were nothing to sneeze at, either.

I know you didn't mean it intentionally, but my thought is that when it comes to Dumont playing foil to classic comedians she had several opportunities beyond co-starring with the Marxes, so those appearances can't really be called "rare." Just my two cents.

Well, if I were Groucho, I'd probably say, "If you don't like 'rare,' how about 'medium well?' How about 'well-done with a side of gravy?'" But okay, you have a point. The lady did do a little more in her career than act clueless about Marx double entendres.

Here's kind of an interesting thing to think about. Ms. Dumont was so perfect in the role of a high-society dowager that directors and casting folks used to refer to that kind of character as "a Margaret Dumont role." When one turned up in a script, they'd describe it thusly and maybe try to hire her. I'll bet there were other actresses who were known for playing "Margaret Dumont roles" when she either wasn't available or if a director feared it was too obvious to book her. There were a lot of character actors back then who seemed synonymous with a certain on-screen function…like Jack Norton (who always played a drunk) or Fritz Feld (who always played a waiter) or Iris Adrian (who always played someone's cheap, loudmouthed girl friend).

So is there anyone like that today? Anyone who's so identified as a certain "type" that they're the obvious casting — or at least, model — for a certain kind of role? I can't think of anyone.

Today's Video Link

As I mentioned recently here, some friends of mine and I went to see Lewis Black perform down in Cerritos. He tours constantly and if he gets anywhere near you, go. I've seen him live about five times now. Once, the sound system was so dreadful that I didn't enjoy it all that much…but the other visits were wonderful. Every time, he had new and topical material.

Recently, he did a concert film called Stark Raving Black which I believe included much of what he did down in Cerritos last week. The movie played briefly in theaters and can now be viewed (for $) at an online viewing site called epix. Early in 2010, the film's supposed to be on Comedy Central (probably with lots of bleeps) and there'll be an unbleeped DVD release, we hear. Below is a short trailer…

VIDEO MISSING

More on Shel

Another obit for Shel Dorf. This one's in the Guardian, which is published in London. And for some reason, it's by me.

Go Hear It!

I was writing here the other day about Carl Reiner, Mel Brooks and the 2000 Year Old Man. Phil Zeman, a reader of this blog, informs me that those of you unfamiliar with the glories of the 2000 Year Old Man have a rare opportunity to experience him…and for free! Just go to this link and give a listen.

Set the TiVo!

Want to see great comedians not at their best? Tonight, Turner Classic Movies is giving you a couple of opportunities.

At 3:30 AM — check your schedule to make sure it's not different where you are — they're running The Horn Blows at Midnight, the 1945 movie that Jack Benny always claimed ended his movie career. It's kind of a silly fantasy and it's far from prime Benny…but it isn't awful. The film became a running gag on his radio show and later, his TV program. They did jokes about catching wanted criminals and, as punishment, making them sit through The Horn Blows at Midnight. It's nowhere near that gruesome and much of it is quite delightful, plus it has Margaret Dumont in a rare non-Marx appearance. Well worth seeing once.

TCM is following that with Block-Heads, a 1938 Laurel & Hardy comedy that for a time, looked like the end of their movie careers, too. It's a short (less than an hour) feature that like many of their pictures, starts out as one movie and then changes premises mid-stream. At the outset, it reminds one of two earlier Harry Langdon military comedies, The Strong Man and Soldier Man…and that may be because Langdon was one of the writers on Block-Heads. So that may be where the plot about Laurel being a World War I vet came from.

But wherever it came from, it quickly disappears. The movie suddenly turns into a remake of one of the umpteen films Stan and Ollie did where a jealous husband walks in on an innocent scene between his wife and Laurel and/or Hardy and thinks there's hanky-panky in progress. As much as I love The Boys, I never warmed to those storylines and this one is more contrived than most. Still, they were at their peak as comedic performers…and their peak was, to me, higher than anyone else's ever. So in spite of the plot, they're wonderful to watch.

Alas, audiences didn't concur when Block-Heads was previewed before audiences. The reaction showed that some rewriting, refilming and further editing were needed. That was not unusual — they did some of that on most of their movies after the first previews — but this time, it was more difficult. Mr. Laurel was having problems in his personal life and he disappeared and was unavailable. Not only was his expertise in comedy writing and editing absent but so was his body. How do you do reshoots on a Laurel & Hardy film without Laurel? The folks at the studio whipped up a few new brief scenes with Mr. Hardy and filmed a whole new end gag (actually, a repeat of one from an earlier film) using stand-ins.

The movie was, from all reports, improved…and yes, I know. A lot of Laurel & Hardy fans consider the end-product one of their best efforts. But I don't and it's my weblog so that's what it's going to say here…though I hasten to point out again that even Laurel and Hardy at their worst is worth watching. And this is far from their worst.

As I said, it was also (almost) their last. Hal Roach's contract to release Laurel & Hardy movies through MGM had ended and Laurel was in absentia. This led to the announcement that the team was kaput. Here's a news item that ran at the time…

Langdon's movie career had declined to the point where he was working as a gagman for Laurel & Hardy. There's some question among historians about how serious Roach and his associates were about creating a Langdon & Hardy team. It seems to have been more of a publicity stunt and a threat to get Mr. Laurel to behave. In any case, the next movie Oliver Hardy made — Zenobia — did not have Laurel and in it and did have Langdon though they were in no sense an on-screen team…just two actors in the same movie.

By the time they filmed Zenobia, Laurel had dealt with his problems and was ready to get back to work. What stopped him was that he and Hardy had always had separate contracts with the Hal Roach Studio, expiring at different times. This seriously limited their negotiating strength since when one's deal was up, that person couldn't credibly threaten to take his partner and go to another studio. Laurel decided to wait until Hardy's current pact was over and thereafter, they would sign only as a team. While waiting for that to happen, Hardy appeared in Zenobia, and audiences shrugged. Nice enough…but they didn't want Oliver without Stanley. Roach then made a deal with United Artists to release more Laurel & Hardy movies and another deal with those men as a unit and that's pretty much the history. Don't let anything I've written here stop you from watching Block-Heads. Like I always say, even weak Laurel & Hardy is better than no Laurel & Hardy.

Today's Video Link

This will primarily be of interest to folks who lived in Los Angeles in the sixties and seventies…

Like all of America back then, we always had at least one radio team trying to be Bob Elliott and Ray Goulding. In every town, two guys at some station would pair up (most of the time, a disc jockey and a news guy) and they'd do a show — usually a morning show — with bogus interviews, recurring characters and (always) a fake ongoing soap opera. Some of these Bob & Ray simulators shamelessly ripped off actual Bob & Ray material. Others just took the idea of two guys being funny between records and ran with it.

We had many such teams in L.A., some of which lasted for weeks, others of which lasted seemingly forever. Hudson & Landry were probably the second longest-running act and the first, inarguably, was Lohman & Barkley. Al Lohman and Roger Barkley were a duo for about 25 years, starting at KLAC and then moving to KFWB and then to KFI. Barkley was the straight man and Lohman did the silly voices and while they sometimes came perilously close to doing Bob & Ray bits, I never heard them actually do one. At times, they were very funny, especially when something would happen to knock them off their semi-prepared material.

I wrote some things for them at KFI, more for fun than money since they paid less than what it cost in gas to drive my little jokes down to the studio. They were nice, genial guys but my lasting impression of them — derived from spending a bit of time there and also following their careers — was a deep frustration that they'd become successful in what they knew was a declining industry…and they were unable to parlay that success into anything else. They tried hosting game shows, acting in movies, doing two-person stand-up, recording comedy albums…and nothing worked out but the radio gig. In the early seventies, the local NBC affiliate had them host a late night comedy talk show that was as hilarious and clever as anything I've ever seen on TV. It was basically a talk show where so many things went wrong that they never got around to asking any of their guests a single question. My friends and I were deeply disappointed when it was cancelled after not-very-many episodes. I wish I had copies of them but I've never heard of anyone having more than a few brief clips. I fear those shows no longer exist.

The partnership ended abruptly in May of 1986. Right in the middle of a broadcast one day, Barkley suddenly decided he'd had enough of it. He got up during a commercial, walked out of the studio and that was the end of the act. They reportedly never spoke again. Barkley became a solo radio personality at another station. Lohman tried a couple of different partners but it wasn't the same. Both men have since passed away.

I recently found this little profile piece on them from, it says, 1980. It gives a little taste of who they were and what they did. And much to my surprise, there's a joke in there about self-deprecating humor that I believe they got from me. Or maybe I got it from them. Anyway, it's a line I've been using since high school and I think I came up with it on my own…but who knows? Maybe I heard it one day listening to Lohman & Barkley. I sure wouldn't have been the only person to steal from them. Or Bob & Ray.

Recommended Reading

Fred Kaplan on what Barack Obama ought do in Afghanistan. Me, I think we oughta go over and open about fifty Five Guys burger joints there. Then at least if our soldiers do get bogged down there for years, they'll have great french fries.

Curtains for Scrooge

We've been tracking the saga here of a touring stage production of A Christmas Carol, which was to have starred F. Murray Abraham, George Wendt, Wayne Knight and James Garner. It was announced by the same folks who mounted the infamous production of the same play last Christmas at the Kodak Theater in Los Angeles. That version — which starred Christopher Lloyd, John Goodman and a couple of folks who filled in for advertised stars who didn't appear — was the one I described as "a live Bloopers show."

For this year, the same producer-director announced a touring company that was to play Chicago, Minneapolis, Philadelphia, Boston and Baltimore. It was to feature Mssrs. Abraham, Wendt, Knight and Garner plus, in the original announcement, Stockard Channing and Timothy Hutton. Then Channing and Hutton pulled out or were never signed, depending on which account one believes. Then various cities dropped off the touring plan…and now, it's been announced that Chicago is off and the tour is not happening at all. Anyone surprised?