Some better (sorta) ratings news for Conan O'Brien. Ultimately, I don't think NBC will be entirely happy for very long if The Tonight Show is in second place, no matter how much money it's making.
Monthly Archives: July 2009
June in July
Those of you who are sick of me plugging my book on Jack Kirby here are in luck. I'm about to start plugging June Foray's autobiography.
June is, of course, the First Lady of Cartoon Voicing. Rocky the Flying Squirrel, Natasha Fatale, Nell Fenwick, Tweety's Granny, Jokey Smurf and Cindy Lou Who made her immortal but they only represent about 5% of all this woman has done as an actress, voiceover performer and a very successful crusader on behalf of the art of animation. My friend Earl Kress and I found her career remarkable before we started helping her with this book…but even we didn't have a proper sense of how much this woman has done, how much she's accomplished.
Did You Grow Up With Me, Too? is the title and it'll be out in time for the Comic-Con International in San Diego…which amazingly is in the week after next. June is a Guest of Honor there. She'll be appearing in a special "spotlight" interview on Saturday at 2:30. There will be a couple of opportunities at the con for you to procure a copy of the book and get her to sign it. I'll be announcing those opportunities here shortly.
If you can't get one there, fear not. Earl and I are going to set up a special offer that will enable you to buy an autographed copy. That'll be announced here soon, as well.
This is a remarkable book about a remarkable lady and it's profusely illustrated with never-before-seen photos from her personal files. You're going to want a copy. Trust me.
Today's Video Link
Air New Zealand has an ad campaign running — not in America, I guess — which features its employees clad only in body paint that simulates their working garb. It has something to do with having nothing to hide or not putting on frills or suggesting that you treat your flight attendants more as sex objects…or something. I won't pretend I understand it.
The motif has been carried over to the safety video they show you on some flights…thereby creating the only safety video that most passengers will ever actually watch. Whether they'll hear anything the people are saying is another question…
Recommended Reading
The current issue of Rolling Stone has an article by Matt Taibbi called "The Great American Bubble Machine." It's a long piece that basically summarizes a lot of America's recent financial disasters and traces them to excessive greed, the clever manipulation of what's legal and shouldn't be, and some outright uninvestigated crimes…all courtesy of execs of Goldman, Sachs. Taibbi offers a colorful and, if true, devastating indictment of those folks and the system that let them get away with costing us bazillions. Goldman, Sachs is responding in a way that seems to want to deny every last word in the piece without getting into specifics and without calling too much attention to it.
Almost as if to aid the piece in not getting too much attention, Rolling Stone has only posted excerpts — not the whole article — on their website. There are bootlegs of the entire Taibbi screed online but I'm not comfy with linking to such things. I suspect Rolling Stone will see the wisdom of posting it in its entirety but for now, that's what's available.
I get that magazine in the mail…and I don't know why. I think I purchased something a year or two ago which came with a free subscription. So I got to read the whole essay and it's quite powerful and if your blood pressure's low, a great way to get it up to around 165 over 100. Wanna see fireworks tonight? Give it a peek.
Independence Day Viewing
Hope you're having a Safe and Sane Fourth of July. There are three movies that seem to always turn up on TV this weekend and they're all on…
In a couple of hours, Turner Classic Movies is running — as someone always does on July 4 — Yankee Doodle Dandy starring James Cagney. The story has very little to do with the actual life of George M. Cohan and the flag-waving can get to you…but Cagney is so good in the role, it's impossible to resist.
Then TCM is running 1776 this evening — at 7:15 on my satellite dish, perhaps another time on your set. They have it in a three-hour slot, which suggests they're running the full version (which runs that long) as opposed to the 142 minute cut that was originally released to theaters and on videotape. A wonderful movie that closely mirrors the wonderful Broadway musical.
Then early tomorrow morning (i.e., not on the Fourth of July), TV Land is running Born on the Fourth of July. I don't know why this is on TV Land. Maybe they ran out of Cosby Show reruns. But this weekend, they're featuring marathons of Leave It To Beaver, Roseanne and The Andy Griffith Show…and smack dab in the middle of them, there's this serious dramatic movie about a war that tore apart this country and so many lives. And then it goes back to Barney Fife trying to remember which pocket he keeps his bullet in. I don't recommend you watch this powerful film like that, especially since it'll probably be interrupted constantly for Prilosec commercials.
Bargains and Beyond
I don't know if it works this way everywhere but here in Southern California, the Bed, Bath and Beyond chain is constantly sending out these coupons that entitle you to 20% of any one item. And I mean they send these out constantly. They arrive every hour on the hour in my mailbox. I will receive at least one more by the time I finish writing and posting this.
Those of us who shop at Bed, Bath and Beyond have learned to save them…to always have a fistful in our cars in case we stop in there. My friend Shelly Goldstein has a car that can seat three people. If she took out the Bed, Bath and Beyond coupons, it could seat four.
Though the coupons have expiration dates printed on them, the store never cares. So if you purchase eight items, you hand the cashier eight of these coupons and you get 20% off each item. This creates some odd buying habits and patterns.
For instance: I go in and I have five coupons. This means, I decide, I can only buy five items. If I see eight things I want, I have to decide which three to get at a later date when I can return with more coupons. I don't even think of paying full price for that little $1.00 item because if I come back another time with a coupon, I can save a big twenty cents on it.
To that end, I have to select in the proper number. Let's say I want six dish towels. A package of eight costs $20 or I can buy six individually for three bucks each. If I have no coupons, I'm better off buying them individually. If I only have one coupon, the package of eight will cost me $16 but to buy six individually will cost $17.40 so I'll buy the package. If I have six coupons or more, I'm better off going back to individual towels. And if I have between two and five coupons, the math gets hard.
It also gets hard when, on occasion, they send out a coupon that just gives you 10% off your entire order. If you have enough 20% coupons, that's a bad deal. If you're short, it might save you some dough…or might not, depending on how many you have.
I've also had this happen: I get to the checkout counter and discover I have miscounted. I have eight items but only seven coupons. As I'm trying to figure out which selection to put back, another customer behind me says, "Need another coupon?" She has like eighty of them sticking out of her purse and she hands me one. At a Bed, Bath and Beyond in Tustin once, I had three items and two coupons. The cashier reached down under the counter and got an extra so she didn't have to charge me full price for one item.
But you can't count on the kindness of strangers or cashiers. So there are times when I might shop at Bed, Bath and Beyond and I don't…because I don't feel like I have enough coupons with me. Right now, I have two in my car. I'm not going in there since I'm bound to see more than two things I want.
When I accumulate a lot of 'em, I start looking for reasons to go to Bed, Bath and Beyond. For one thing, it will help me to get rid of the clutter in my car if I use up my coupons. (I don't want to leave them home for fear I'll be out driving and suddenly think of a reason to stop at one of those stores.) I also feel like I'm getting a bargain even though I suspect that with the 20% discount, that cheese straightener will still cost more than if I bought it at Kmart. I haven't checked because I don't want to know for sure. It just feels like a bargain to use your 20% off coupons at Bed, Bath and Beyond. And like I said, it cleans out your car at the same time.
Whoops. Two more coupons just arrived. I'd better post this and run over to Bed, Bath and Beyond to use them up. If it turns out they're closed for the Fourth of July, I'll just wait outside.
Recommended Reading
Bruce Reed discusses Sarah Palin's surprise resignation. He discusses it from the standpoint of how it's a bad move if her goal is to win the presidency. I suspect that she's already resigned herself to the idea that any higher office is out of her reach and that what she wants to do is to ostensibly run for president and — like Pat Buchanan, Ralph Nader and others we could name — derive the benefits of a candidacy without ever getting within a hundred miles of victory.
Palin's resignation speech itself demonstrated why she's a bad candidate. The whole point of it was to try and assert she was not taking "the quitter's way out" — a point she somehow thought she could score in a speech to announce that she was quitting and getting out. One gets the feeling that Ms. Palin's small band of fervent supporters has convinced her that she can say anything and get people to believe it. Or maybe she's just decided that all she cares about is that small band. And of course, she made her usual gaffes, like attributing to Douglas MacArthur a quote from someone else.
The thing that fascinates me about all this is that a lot of folks seem to confuse the candidate with the message. If he or she says the things they want to hear…well then, that person would unquestionably make a great president and will win in a walk if only he or she runs on that platform. I see lotsa folks whose political views mirror mine…but who I think are such clumsy orators, or who have so much baggage, that they could never win. Or they seem to lack the governing skills to turn those views into a working agenda.
If I believed in what Sarah Palin seems to believe in, she's just about the last public figure I'd want to throw my support behind. She makes those views seem kinda stupid and shallow. I'd be rallying for someone like Mike Huckabee. I personally don't buy his worldview or goals but he articulates them well and seems to know how to play the political game and get results. What he doesn't do, and this may be why more Conservatives aren't lining up behind him, is make Liberals froth. Palin does, and that seems to be the main thing that a lot of people like about her. But if that's all you want, you might as well nominate Michael Savage.
Today's Video Link
This clip's a little outta sync but it almost doesn't matter. It's George Carl on a vintage Johnny Carson Tonight Show, with Mr. Carl doing the act he did so well for around seventy years. I'm not sure if I've linked to a version of this before since Carl usually did pretty much the same portions of his longer act any time he got booked on television. He did at least two other appearances with Johnny and did the exact same bits…and Carson loved it every time.
Well, whether I've linked to this before or not, here's one of the funniest human beings I've ever had the privilege to see…
Baked Alaska
What do we think the deal is with Sarah Palin resigning? A quick tour of political websites of all stripes today tells me that no one really understands the reason(s) she gave and to the extent anyone thinks they get a wee bit of it, they don't believe her.
So let's review some possibilities…
- She's about to be indicted for some kind of crime? Maybe. But usually, you cling to public office in those circumstances so you can trade your resignation for a lighter sentence.
- Some other kind of scandal not involving her indictment? Another, larger maybe.
- She's pregnant again? Don't see why that would get in the way.
- Something else medical? Naw. Then you quit because of health reasons so you can get the sympathy.
- Prepping for a presidential run? Not likely. A sitting governor would have more standing than a former governor who couldn't or wouldn't even finish out one term.
- Fox News has offered her a ton o' money to host a show right after Glenn Beck's? Hmm…
There are other possibilities, I suppose. But they probably all start with Ms. Palin realizing that, as rabid as her little band of supporters may be, it's a little band and she's not able to win over even a majority of Republicans. She's gone as high as she's able to go in elected office…and if you can't go higher, why stick with it?
Today's Video Link
You're not going to watch much, if any of this link. I'm only embedding it because, well, I can. And I thought you might like to hear the story that went with it.
In early 1976, I was teamed with a bright gent named Dennis Palumbo and together, we were one of a bazillion up-and-coming comedy-writing teams skulking about Hollywood, waiting for a break to find us. Nothing we'd written had made it to a TV screen yet but we were getting a rep and we'd gotten some good agents…and there were folks at studios and networks who looked favorably, they claimed, on our work. And I guess they did because we were being offered jobs.
Our representatives called and told us to report to a screening room at ABC to view a new, as-yet-unaired pilot. We so reported and were shown a two-hour TV-movie called The Love Boat — an anthology starring as the ship's crew, Dick Van Patten, Terri O'Mara and a whole bunch of other actors who would not be in the subsequent series. After the viewing, which was just for Dennis and me, we met Dawn Aldredge and Marion C. Freeman, who were the writing team that was developing the project. Here is what they told us…
ABC liked the pilot but had major problems with the cast and with the show's level of sophistication. The latter was all over the place, inconsistent from one segment to the next. What we'd just been shown might never air. A few months later, it did, though heavily re-edited to try and correct that inconsistency.
In the meantime, ABC had ordered another Love Boat pilot — another two-hour TV movie which, like the one we'd just seen, would interweave four separate stories. The ship's crew would be completely recast and they were about to sign Sandy Duncan to play the cruise director, who'd been tentatively named Sandy. (I have no idea what happened there.)
The plan at that moment was to make this a racy, adult series with way more sex than had ever been featured before on network TV. It would probably not become a weekly hour series but would more likely be a string of more two-hour movies. They'd run from time to time in some unspecified late night berth that didn't yet exist — maybe on Saturday nights from 10 PM 'til Midnight, changing forever the whole parameters of customary network time slots and on-screen sexuality. What's more, the material might be filmed and edited in two forms. The one that would air on ABC would feature adult themes and brief nudity. Another version, featuring more adult language and more nudity, would probably be released overseas, perhaps even as theatrical films.
Anyway, Dennis and I were hired at a nice fee to write one of the segments for the second Love Boat pilot, and we came up with a story about a bunch of frat boys who go for a cruise. One of them is a virgin…a condition which causes the lad to be much-mocked by his buddies to the point where the whole ship gets to talking about it. Before long, strangers are even giggling at him and wagering as to whether he'll become a Real Man by the time the ship makes port. All of this ratchets up the pressure on Danny (as we called him) to score and he tries like crazy, making an increasingly-grander fool of himself with the ladies upon whom he hits.
Finally, on the night before the ship docks, he gives up and it's only then, when he drops the Blitzkrieg approach, that he meets a woman who likes him without his tricks and "lines." They spend that last night together and it's so wonderful that when it comes time to disembark and his friends ridicule him for having spent a whole week on the guaranteed-to-get-you-laid Love Boat without being deflowered, he doesn't tell them otherwise. He and the lady go their separate ways with nice memories, uncheapened by him bragging to his pals.
We handed in our script and everyone said they liked it. One exec at ABC was so impressed that it helped us land our jobs as story editors on Welcome Back, Kotter, which in turn kept us from writing more for Love Boat. But our script was not filmed for the second two-hour Love Boat TV movie or even the third. We were told that the network was balking at making the franchise as "adult" as had been planned and that our script would be "ruined" if it had to be rewritten to the current-but-likely-to-loosen standards. It was being held, we were told, until the network would allow two people to have sex without them either being married or deciding to immediately get that way.
And indeed, that script was not ruined until Love Boat became a weekly one-hour series. It aired at 9 PM and all talk of making it close to R-rated subsided. Someone rewrote darn near every word of our effort to fit the much-less-naughtier motif. Robert Hegyes, with whom we worked on Kotter, was grossly miscast as the boy. We'd written the role for someone frail and innocent…no actor in mind but we were thinking, like, a younger Gene Wilder maybe?
The lady with whom he finally canoodles was to be played by someone who was not a star. That was because she was supposed to more or less come out of nowhere and apart from a parting exchange of smiles on the dock, she would disappear after. At least, that's what everyone understood when we wrote it. But ABC now wanted billable names in their show so they got Maureen McCormack of The Brady Bunch and then they had to give her scenes earlier in the story to establish her presence and make sure Maureen got enough to do.
The biggest change, of course, was that the one-night stand could not be a one-night stand because, though that's apparently what the real Love Boats were mainly about, there were none then on network television. The boy and girl had to have a real relationship that was likely to culminate in wedlock. So the rewriters rewrote such that Danny and the lady turned out to be friends from school (it had briefly slipped his mind) and they were going to continue dating after the cruise and probably get married. Not at all what our story was about.
By the time it aired, Dennis and I felt pretty distanced from it all. It was a nice credit since the weekly Love Boat series was a pretty big hit but there were only two lasting remnants for me from the experience. One was that after Dennis and I decided to go our separate ways, I teamed up for a time with Marion Freeman and worked on a couple of shows, and she's still a good friend. And every so often, I get a Love Boat residual check for about a buck-eighty.
Embedded below is the entire hour episode. Our heavily-rewritten script is entwined with two other scenarios…and I'm really not suggesting you view it. I didn't, except the first minute or so, just to see if the type font of the writer credits was actually as hard to read as I recalled. It was, which coupled with how briefly our names were on the screen, may have been a blessing. I believe all the credited folks complained and Love Boat later changed fonts and increased screen time of their credits. In any case, the link below may require you to sit through an ad before it plays…in which case, I would really recommend you not watch it. But I put it there because I could and because I thought you'd enjoy the story that leads up to it. You've read it so now you can find something better on the Internet to watch…like this, for instance.
Health of a Nation
My math skills were never great. They began to atrophy when I got my first calculator and I lost another chunk after I gained a Business Manager. So there's a large part of the health care debate is that just, as Mr. Obama would say, far above my pay grade.
Still, I can see that something has to be done about all the folks in this country who have no insurance, all the people who do have insurance but discover (usually at the worst-possible moment) that it won't cover what they need it to cover, and the sheer fact that most health care is just too damned expensive. In intolerable numbers, people die and/or go bankrupt because of the system. In the absence of a fix, it'll eventually get so bad that even rabid Republicans will be wishing we'd passed the Hillary Clinton plan.
I follow as much of it as I can…as if anything I might say or do will ever make a difference. Two of the best sources of news and analysis I've found online are Ezra Klein and Jonathan Cohn. These are Liberal voices but so far, I haven't come across a Conservative take on health care that wasn't based on either or both of the following premises: That anything the government touches is invariably going to be a disaster and/or that it would be a shame to see the insurance companies not make every possible nickel off your Grandma's arthritis.
Opponents of revamping health care are losing ground every day. Every poll says that even G.O.P. voters want it fixed and you have entities like Walmart demanding health care reform. I can't believe something won't get done. But then again, I also can't believe we have Senators and Congressfolks acting like the system is fine or, at worst, just needs a little Bactine and a band-aid. Or maybe a loving mother to kiss the boo-boo.
Harvey Wallbanger
There are two major awards voted each year from work in the field of comic books. One is the Eisners, which are handed out at the Comic-Con International in San Diego. The other is the Harveys, which have lately been given out at the Baltimore Comic Convention. This year, I'm up for two Eisners and the other day, I seem to have been nominated for two Harveys for my book, Kirby: King of Comics.
I say "seem" because one is in the category of "Special Award for Excellence in Presentation" and I'm not sure if that's for me or for the folks who designed the book, one of whom was an uncredited (for that) me. This is not a point that needs clarification; just something I mention to underscore how nebulous these things can be. I am occasionally congratulated because Groo the Wanderer has repeatedly won the Harvey in a category called "Special Award for Humor in Comics" but I don't think that award was for me. It's gone to my collaborator, Sergio Aragonés.
I also don't think the distinction matters because awards, though nice, don't make you any better and the absence of them doesn't make you any worse. They have a slight marketing value and they please certain people in your life. The first time I was up for an Emmy, my father was still alive and the only reason I cared if I won was because I knew how happy it would make him. Oh — and maybe because the statue might (emphasis on the "might") have given me a little more clout on my next project.
I don't mean to disparage anyone's award because winning any such trophy is not at all a negative unless, as a few unfortunates do, you take it as incontrovertible proof you're a genius and needn't listen to others. There's also nothing negative about being nominated unless you overdramatize it to the point where you'll be crushed if you lose. Anyway, I've learned to just say thanks and to otherwise pay no nevermind to awards. The first time I won an Eisner, I carried this to an extreme. I didn't even know I was nominated, didn't attend the ceremony, didn't find out until years later that I'd won and never got the actual trophy, which I think was then a certificate.
Tom Spurgeon and others are making the case that the Harveys are redundant and ill-administered and that they oughta be put to sleep. As a nominee this year (and I believe but am not sure, other years), I'm being asked what I think about this. What I think about this is that I don't think a lot about this. I completely buy any argument that the absolute best work is not being selected but I kinda feel that way about every award in every field. Perhaps given the response to the current list of Harvey nominees — and I hope, not because I'm on it — their process does need some fixing if it's going to retain any credibility.
But really, discussing whether or not to abolish an award is almost treating it with too much seriousness. It's suggesting that the ones you don't want eliminated do a highly efficient job of zeroing in on The Best and the Brightest. Each year, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences doles out a lot of Oscars that elevate one film or contributor above others that do not seem directly comparable or often, to me, less deserving. I don't see it as an injustice that demands correction if the Harvey Awards do this. It also wouldn't change all that much if either set of awards went bye-bye.
We all have a chance to vote on this. We cast our votes with whatever amount of attention we pay to a set of awards. If we afford them none, they'll fade away. And if we get excited about them and talk or write a lot about them, then they probably deserve to continue. It's all blue smoke that means as much as you want it to mean…no more, no less. The administrators of the Harvey Awards may have some problems to solve but we don't, except to decide how much, if at all, we care.
Today's Video Link
In the U.K., one must pay one's Road Tax, which is a tax for driving one's car. This has been suggested for California but I suspect we'll see a tax on breathing in this state before we see one on driving.
Anyway, across the pond they not only collect this tax, they do clever commercials to encourage folks to come across with their fees. Here's one that uses a tune that regular readers of this blog are probably sick of by now. Thanks to Tony Redman for the tip.
Recommended Reading
Bob Eckstein discusses the demise of his career as a freelance cartoonist. If everything he'd submitted had been as entertaining as this piece, he wouldn't have had to write this piece.
Karl Malden, R.I.P.
Here is my one Karl Malden anecdote. It's about ten, twelve years ago. I'm directing a voice session for the Garfield cartoon show. I'm sitting at the little console and the actors are in another room, visible through a large glass window. When I wish to speak to them, I push a button on the console and they can hear me. One of the actors in there is Howard Morris, beloved character actor better known to some of you as Atom Ant, Ernest T. Bass, Uncle Goopy, Jet Screamer, Jughead Jones, the Qantas Koala, Wade Duck or dozens of other roles he played.
So I'm fumbling through the script and a man in a suit and tie comes in from the hallway and, ever so politely, he says "I'm sorry to intrude but could I just take a moment and say hello to my friend Howie?" It's Karl Malden. He was recording something in the next studio and someone told him Howie Morris was in with us. I tell him he's more than welcome, whereupon he hits the little button and says, over my microphone, "Howie? It's Karl Malden!"
Howie looks through the glass, sees Malden and says, "Karl! Still foolin' 'em?"
Karl grins and says, "Still foolin' 'em!"
Howie, who is about the size of Karl Malden's nose, runs out of the booth. They embrace. They discuss how each has aged since their last encounter. Howie itemizes his marriages and divorces since then. Karl says, "You're working. I don't want to take you away from that." He hugs Howie again and moves towards the door.
Howie yells, "Keep foolin' 'em!"
Malden laughs, promises to keep foolin' 'em and then he leaves and we go back to work.
That's my one Karl Malden anecdote. Sorry it isn't better because a guy with his body of acclaimed acting work deserves better. But it's the only one I've got.