I don't know why I've become such a champion for Boop! The Musical, a show I haven't seen. I guess it's just that I've heard good things about it from friends who've seen it, I like the online clips I've seen and I'd like the show to still be up and running if/when I get back to New York later this year. (By the way, the cast recording will be released before this week is out.)

This morning when I woke up, the first thing I checked online was to see if the folks who program The Tony Awards had found a place for the show to present a number on their telecast this Sunday. No word yet even though the online petition has over 5,000 signatures. That's almost half the people who watch the Tony Awards each year.

Our floundering president is claiming that if the monstrosity he calls his "Big, Beautiful Bill" doesn't pass, the people of this country will suffer a tax increase of 68%. FactCheck.org explains the mathematical gymnastics required to arrive at that number.

And he's trying to sell that bill with a whole lot o' lying as The New York Times points out. Glenn Kessler of the Washington Post also points out the untruths that Trump's minions are spreading about the Congressional Budget Office's scoring of the bill

Also, Steve Benen points out the efforts of G.O.P. leaders to prevent the C.B.O. from doing its job of analyzing bills like the supposed "Big, Beautiful" one. It's even working on some of their own…like Marjorie Taylor Greene who's now saying she voted for the bill without knowing everything that is in it.

Meanwhile, Mr. Kessler also notes how the White House is lying about fraud in the Social Security system. But of course.

Flashing back again to a time in my childhood when "home video" meant buying short 8mm movies, usually silent ones. A friend and I were buying whatever Laurel & Hardy films we could afford and my friend ordered a four-minute film advertised as Stan Laurel doing a crazy dance. But it wasn't Stan Laurel, though you could kinda see why the seller made that mistake. It was a different Brit — a man sometimes billed as The Greatest Eccentric Dancer. I can't dance at all but if I could, I'd like to dance like Jack Stanford…

Playbill has an article about the campaign to allow Boop! The Musical to present a number on this Sunday's Tony Awards celebration. Of note is that the show's director Jerry Mitchell says they have a presentation all ready to go. I don't know if it's even possible, this close to the telecast date to squeeze another show in. Even if it is, I'm not sure if a petition would matter, no matter how many people signed on to it.

What might: My friend Shelly Goldstein informs me that a lot of the Broadway pundits she's seen have predicted that the Best Actress in a Musical Tony Award will go, not to Audra, Megan or Nicole but to Jasmine Amy Rogers, star of Boop! The folks programming the award show have no knowledge of who'll win — or at least, they're not supposed to have any knowledge of who will win — but they sure hear from the Broadway community and it sure would make for Better Television if Ms. Rogers performed, then won.

Moreover: An umpteenth Tony to Audra will not make a bit of difference to her career and maybe not a lot to the box office at Gypsy, a show that is probably already well into profit. But Boop! seems to be struggling a bit to keep the footlights on. A Tony in that category might be life-saving. Lin-Manuel Miranda has been quoted as saying that when he did his show In the Heights, he prayed to win a Tony or two because that show needed to sell more tickets to survive. When he was later up for Hamilton, he didn't care as much because the show was already sold out for months and months.

I suspect a lot of those folks in the Broadway world think that way. If enough of them do, we may see an upset this Sunday. And that's always nice, especially when you're not the favorite.

An online petition campaign has been launched to get the Tony Awards people to squeeze in a performance slot this Sunday for Boop! The Musical. I suspect it's too late but, hey, it won't hurt to sign the petition.

I know nothing about how the folks behind the telecast decide what gets on and what doesn't. They try to include a number from every nominated musical and once in a while, they slip in one or two that didn't make that cut. I would guess that this year, they had so many that there was no time for all of those that didn't. They picked two by whatever criteria they used…but Jasmine Amy Rogers, who's pretty much the whole show, was nominated for Best Actress in a Musical and I would think that would carry some weight. But again, I don't know how this gets decided…

The Tony Awards are this Sunday and as in years past, they're so big that one channel can't contain them. There will be two parts to the presentation.

It starts with The Tony Awards: Act One which will be hosted by Darren Criss and Renée Elise Goldsberry. This will be viewable on the Pluto TV streaming service beginning at 6:40 PM on the East Coast and therefore 3:40 PM on the West Coast. This segment will run for an hour and twenty minutes — until the time the second part of this commences.

To view it, go to Pluto TV, click on the "live music" channel that's within the Entertainment category. At least, that's what they say to do. Don't blame me if you wind up watching a rerun of The Price is Right from back when they were playing a game where you could win a car by guessing all four numbers in its price. That's all I seem to be able to find on Pluto TV. Maybe you'll have better luck.

This will be followed by The 78th Annual Tony Awards broadcast live on CBS from Radio City Music Hall and hosted by Cynthia Erivo. This part starts at 8:00 PM on the East Coast and therefore 5:00 PM on the West Coast and I'll bet you already figured that out. This part is expected to run three hours and at least on the West Coast, it will be followed by a complete replay. Remember the days when the Tonys had to run two hours and not a second longer?

The CBS telecast will include musical numbers from all the shows this season nominated for Best Musical. Those would be Buena Vista Social Club, Dead Outlaw, Death Becomes Her, Maybe Happy Ending and Operation Mincemeat. There will also be presentations from the shows up for Best Revival of a Musical — Floyd Collins, Gypsy, Pirates! The Penzance Musical and Sunset Boulevard.

But that's not all! There will also be a performance by the original cast of Hamilton and numbers from two new musicals that were not nominated — Just In Time and Real Women Have Curves. I'm not seeing anything about a number from Boop! The Musical at least on the CBS part of the show. There's also no word if they're going to set up a dunk tank with Patti LuPone in it and let everyone on Broadway lob softballs at the target.

Having seen exactly zero of these shows, I have no predictions and no rooting interest. When the nominations were first announced, everyone seemed to assume that Audra McDonald in Gypsy would glide to an easy victory for Best Performance by an Actress in a Leading Role in a Musical. Ah, but some Broadway pundits are now cautiously forecasting an upset in that category by Nicole Scherzinger in Sunset Boulevard and I saw one going out on a limb for Megan Hilty in Death Becomes Her. You still have time to get a bet down.

Andy Huggins is pretty darned funny — but I don't know what to make of the fact that a guy delivering those jokes is only a year older than I am…

I continue to get an indecent number of Spam calls — strangers calling me, trying to get me to buy some product, hire them for some service or just give them cash for their "worthy" (and maybe it is) cause. I have a strict policy of saying no to all of them without exception but I'm on enough lists that the calls, they keep on comin'.

A few are almost pleasant, especially after I say — as I do to the more polite ones — "I'm going to do you a favor. There's no way I'm buying what you're selling. There's no need to go through the whole sales pitch." The ones that annoy me most are the ones who act like we have some pre-existing relationship and they've called me because of it. One such call might go like this…

"Mark, it's Harold Shmeckel with Shmeckel Construction. We spoke a couple months ago and you said that around the beginning of June, you'd be ready to do some upgrades of your property. My company's lead estimator will be in your area next Tuesday and I wanted to schedule him to drop by so you could discuss those improvements we talked about."

They only protest a little when I tell them we've never talked before and sometimes, I tell them, "Since you started this call by lying to me, I certainly can't trust you to do any construction work for me." Or sometimes, I play along and ask them something like, "Did we talk about refinishing my tennis court?" The caller will invariably reply that, yes, we talked about that and he assured me his company was highly experienced in refinishing tennis courts, whereupon…well, you can guess how that exchange ends.

Since I turned seventy, fewer of these calls come from contractors and more come from firms that want to arrange for my "final expenses," which means prepaying for my funeral and whatever the hell is going to be done with my body. I'm thinking of having it cryogenically frozen and then every July, they'll thaw me out for four days to host panels at Comic-Con.

The last time I got one of those "final expenses" calls, a day or three ago, I told the caller, "Sorry but there's every indication I'm going to be around a lot longer than your crummy fly-by-night company." The caller sadly muttered "Probably" and then hung up.

Lately, I get some of those "We spoke last year" calls that claim they spoke with Dorothea. Dorothea was my mother who died in 2012. For some reason, her name is still on a lot of the lists that are sold to cold-callers and my phone number is attached. I've had several solicitors call and tell me that she spoke to them that not long before, she asked them to call about cleaning out her gutters. My mother donated to a number of charities and most of them have called to remind her she hasn't made her usual donation lately.

Almost in the same category as strangers who pretend my mother and/or I spoke to them before are people who fit the following description: We spoke or met briefly way in the past…and then they call me, don't identify themselves and start a conversation based on the assumption that I will instantly recognize their voices. I had a guy do that the other day. We met ever-so-briefly at a Comic-Con years ago and I'm pretty sure we never spoke on the phone. He, like all those sales persons, wasn't showing me Caller I.D.

Still, he started right in with "How are things going?" and "What are you up to these days?" and there I was without the foggiest clue who I was talking to. He wasn't calling to try and sell me anything or to try and refinish that tennis court which I don't have…but he was still kind of annoying. I wish people wouldn't do any of this.

Glenn Kessler of The Washington Post catches House Speaker Mike Johnson misrepresenting a past budget projection by the Congressional Budget Office. As Kessler notes, "Lawmakers love to cite [a C.B.O. analysis] when it gives them a number they like (as Johnson did only a few days before this interview) and attack it when the number causes political problems."

The Associated Press says that Trump's claims about remedial math at Harvard University don't add up. When have any numbers cited by Donald Trump ever added up?

The New York Times says Trump and "his allies" are straight-out lying about what his "Big, Beautiful Bill" will do to healthcare in this country. Steve Benen of The Maddow Blog has more to say about this.

And lastly for now: This article at the Times notes how many bogus numbers were cited in Elon Musk's "send-off" as the guy doing whatever the hell he was doing. It's starting to look like this man cost this country a lot more money than he saved.

Lin-Manuel Miranda teaches us some of the slang terms used on Broadway. One he left out is "hot bodies," which refers to audience members who actually paid to get in…

I embed a lot of video links on this blog. If at any point, some video seems to be in the wrong window, that almost certainly is a problem on your end, not mine. It means the cache on your web browser has too much stuff in it and it's getting confused. What you need to do is to flush (i.e., clean out) your browser cache. If you don't know how to do this, this page should tell you.

I haven't written anything about the passing of actress Loretta Swit because I never met her and know nothing about her that any other M*A*S*H watcher doesn't already know. She was very good on a very good TV show…and you don't need me to tell you that. But you might need me to tell you that my pal Paul Harris did a real good interview with her back in 2004 and you can hear it on Paul's website.

Patti LuPone is a big star on Broadway. I've only seen her once on stage there or anywhere. It was the 2008 revival of Gypsy and I thought she did a great job of capturing the nastiness of Mama Rose and a poor job of speaking or singing the words of the play in a manner than most people could understand. My friend Carolyn, who'd never seen the show before, kept whispering "What did she say?" to me and we had very good seats.

So I guess I'd say I'm not a fan but I could be if I saw her in something where I could make out most of what she was saying or singing. I also understand why some people love her.

But some people are not loving her a lot these days as this headline makes clear: Over 500 Broadway Artists Release Open Letter Reprimanding Patti LuPone. She said some things in this recent interview that were pretty nasty towards other performers and there was some arguably-racist stuff in there. They were the kind of comments that make people lose a whole lot of respect for the commenter even when there isn't a somewhat-organized protest as there has been in this case.

Ms. LuPone has issued an apology that is pretty damned thorough and it sounds sincere. We've all seen apologies that try to dodge responsibility with phrases like "I'm sorry if anyone was offended" but this one was pretty thorough. I gather that some people in the theatrical community are willing to accept it and let that be the end of it but some think more outrage is warranted. Looking at this from afar, I'd say it's now a matter of personal reconciliation with those she attacked.

She made a number of mistakes but a big one was saying those things in print instead of in a video interview. If we all saw her say them, we wouldn't have understood half of what she was talking about.

I didn't see Disney's recent live-action remake of Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs and…well, I was going to say, "And neither did anyone else I know" but I realized my pal Leonard Maltin probably did. Or maybe he didn't. We haven't discussed it.

But this video is 100% of what I've seen of the film and you can surmise my reaction by noting that I'm writing this instead of dashing out to find a theater playing it. I'm not sure there is one.

You can't/shouldn't judge a movie by one scene but I would think that if they couldn't make this particular scene sparkle, it doesn't bode well for the rest of the picture. The mostly-CGI dwarfs look more freakish than endearing to me and I don't know why they transformed Dopey into Alfred E. Neuman. But you make up your own mind…and I'm kinda curious if an audience unfamiliar with the animated original would find this enchanting. I am not ruling out that that's possible.

Meanwhile, I should mention that the aforementioned Mr. Maltin and I will be doing a panel at Comic-Con International in San Diego. It's called "Great Cartoonists and Comedians We Have Known" and we're just going to sit there and tell stories about — you guessed it — great cartoonists and comedians we have known. If you aren't tempted by that panel, I have fifteen more you may enjoy…

Back in this post, I wrote about folks on the Internet who tell you what is good for you to eat and what is bad. There's been a recent explosion of them, inspired (I suspect) by the fact that a gent named Bobby Parrish, who I wrote about then, and a few others seem to be making very tidy livings with such videos. It feels to me like there are thousands of them now and that at least 95% of them don't know what the hell they're talking about. It also feels to me like I haven't the time or knowledge to winnow out the 5% who might.

Some of them imply or outright claim to be doctors…and who knows? A few of them might actually be real ones. It almost doesn't matter because you have one guy explaining how seed oils will kill you and a lady telling you seed oils are great for you and someone of indeterminate gender telling you that seed oils won't have any effect on you, good or bad, until you've consumed enough to fill an Olympics-size swimming pool. As a person with numerous food allergies, I have never believed in one-size-fits-all advice on what I should or shouldn't eat. That's one of the gripes I have with online medical and food recommendations — that myopic attitude of "This is good for me so of course it'll be good for you!"

I haven't been in a Costco lately but from the looks of some of my Instagram browsing, their stores are all filled with people making little videos telling you what to buy, what to eat, what not to put in your mouth, etc. Most of them seem unaware that there's a pretty good chance that what's sold in their neighborhood Costco might not be sold in everyone's neighborhood Costco…so even their reports on what's available isn't very useful to me. And a lot of them seem to think that they're the only ones smart enough to read the label on something.

I've started skipping these videos and whenever possible, I click whatever I can click to try and be shown less of them…but it's difficult. To give health advice on the Internet, you don't have to know anything about medicine or nutrition or the contents of our food. You just have to know how to upload. I'm fully expecting Trump to appoint one of them to oversee our nation's health…because you just know whoever's next in that job will know even less than Robert F. Kennedy Jr.